• Complain

Corballis - The Recursive Mind

Here you can read online Corballis - The Recursive Mind full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Princeton University Press, genre: Home and family. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Corballis The Recursive Mind
  • Book:
    The Recursive Mind
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Princeton University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Recursive Mind: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Recursive Mind" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Recursive Mind challenges the commonly held notion that language is what makes us uniquely human. In this compelling book, Michael Corballis argues that what distinguishes us in the animal kingdom is our capacity for recursion: the ability to embed our thoughts within other thoughts. I think, therefore I am, is an example of recursive thought, because the thinker has inserted himself into his thought. Recursion enables us to conceive of our own minds and the minds of others. It also gives us the power of mental time travel--The ability to insert past experiences, or imagined future ones, into present consciousness. Drawing on neuroscience, psychology, animal behavior, anthropology, and archaeology, Corballis demonstrates how these recursive structures led to the emergence of language and speech, which ultimately enabled us to share our thoughts, plan with others, and reshape our environment to better reflect our creative imaginations. He shows how the recursive mind was critical to survival in the harsh conditions of the Pleistocene epoch, and how it evolved to foster social cohesion. He traces how language itself adapted to recursive thinking, first through manual gestures, then later, with the emergence of Homo sapiens, vocally. Toolmaking and manufacture arose, and the application of recursive principles to these activities in turn led to the complexities of human civilization, the extinction of fellow large-brained hominins like the Neandertals, and our species supremacy over the physical world. Some images inside the book are unavailable due to digital copyright restrictions.

Corballis: author's other books


Who wrote The Recursive Mind? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Recursive Mind — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Recursive Mind" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

The Recursive Mind The Recursive Mind The Origins of Human - photo 1

The Recursive Mind
_______

The Recursive Mind
________

The Origins of Human Language,
Thought, and Civilization

Michael C. Corballis

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD

Copyright 2011 by Princeton University Press

Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street,

Princeton, New Jersey 08540

In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street,

Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW

press.princeton.edu

All Rights Reserved

Third printing, and first paperback printing, with a new foreword by the author, 2014
Paperback ISBN 978-0-691-16094-8

The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition of this book as follows

Corballis, Michael C.

The recursive mind : the origins of human language, thought, and civilization / Michael C. Corballis.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-0-691-14547-1 (cloth : alk. paper)

1. Evolutionary psychology. 2. Human evolution.

3. BrainEvolution. 4. Language and languagesOrigin. I. Title.

BF701.C665 2011

155.7dc22 2010043084

British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available

This book has been composed in Sabon LT Std text with Scala Sans OT Condensed display

Printed on acid-free paper

Printed in the United States of America

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

Contents
____

Foreword to the Paperback Edition
____

The rather biblical notion that we humans were miraculously gifted language seems to persist unabated. In a recent popular and engaging book, published in 2012, the distinguished paleoanthropologist Ian Tattersall wrote as follows:

Our ancestors made an almost unimaginable transition from a non-symbolic, nonlinguistic way of processing information and communicating information about the world to the symbolic and linguistic condition we enjoy today. It is a qualitative leap in cognitive state unparalleled in history. Indeed, as Ive said, the only reason we have for believing that such a leap could ever have been made, is that it was made. And it seems to have been made well after the acquisition by our species of its distinctive modern form.

How lucky we were, you might think, to receive this blessing. Without it, you wouldnt be reading this book.

In the first edition of this book, I tried to broaden the discussion as to what makes us human by arguing that recursion, often considered the critical component of language that distinguishes it from communication in other species, applies not only to language, but to other aspects of human thought. These include the recursive ability to insert the thoughts of others in our own thoughts and to insert past or future experiences into current experience, otherwise known as mental time travel. These considerations led me to suppose that recursive thinking, and indeed language itself, probably evolved gradually over the past six million years or so of hominin evolution, and that some elements of recursive thinking may even be present in great apes. In short, we dont need to appeal to sudden miracles.

The problem with attempts to explain the human condition, though, is that the evidence keeps nibbling away at ones hard-won conclusions. In my case, as I perhaps should have anticipated, the nibbling was done by rats. For some years, Thomas Suddendorf and I had argued that mental time travel was unique to humans The titles of these books tell their stories.

But other mammals, and even birds, have hippocampi. It has long been known that the hippocampus of the rat contains cells that respond when a rat is in a particular location in some environment, such as a maze. These cells are known as place cells. It transpires that these cells fire in sharp-wave ripples when the rat is removed from that environment, and that the sequence of firing effectively maps out a trajectory in the environment. Sometimes the trajectory is one the animal had previously traversed, but sometimes it is the reverse of that trajectory, and sometimes it is a trajectory unrelated to one actually traversed. It seems that the rat is mentally reliving a past experience, or imagining a future one, or perhaps even indulging in a peripatetic fantasy. Early in 2013, I wrote a short paper suggesting that rats could travel mentally in time, embedding past and perhaps future episodes into the present.

I have little doubt that our own mental time travels are more complex and more interesting. Moreover, we can talk about our mental time travels; indeed, I suggest in the book that language evolved precisely to enable us to communicate about the nonpresentevents that do not take place in the here and now. Rats, on the other hand, cant talk, and must therefore keep their mental time travels to themselves. To find out about them, neuroscientists had to insert electrodes into their hippocampi. The results remind us that we should always be wary of assertions about human uniqueness. The origins of mental time travel may go back much further in evolution than I suggest in the book. So far, that is my only reservation, but it pays always to watch out for rat nibblings.

Notes

. Tattersall, I. 2012, 199.

. Wearing 2005.

. Corkin 2013.

. Corballis 2013.

Additional references

Corballis, M.C. 2013. Mental time travel: A case for evolutionary continuity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 56.

Corkin, S. 2013. Permanent present tense. New York: Basic Books.

Tattersall, I. 2012. Masters of the planet: The search for human origins. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Preface
____

We humans like to think that we have capacities that make us not only distinct from all other creatures on the planet, but also superior to them. What other species, you might ask, has measured the speed of light, figured out how the universe began, invented the laptop computer, or painted a portrait? Our species has even succeeded in escaping from the planet altogether, even if only fleetingly. You might also ask, I suppose, why any other species would care to do these things, and we do need to be wary of our comfortable assumption that we are at the top of the earthly hierarchy, since it provides a too-easy justification of the appalling way we treat other animals. Lets face it: We eat them, kill them for sport, drink their milk, wear their skins, ride on their backs, ridicule them, house them in zoos, and breed them to our own specifications.

By the same token, though, it cannot be denied that our species has dominated the earth like no other. Not only do we subjugate other creatures to our needs and whims, but we also mold the physical environment to our specifications, to the point that our success may prove to be our undoing. Unless we make better use of our vaunted intelligence, we run the risk of succumbing to pollution, global warming, or weapons of mass destructionor, to think recursively, of weapons for the mass destruction of weapons of mass destruction. And yet we are biologically almost indistinguishable from the other great apes, and share a common ancestor with the chimpanzee and bonobo dating from only about six or seven million years agoa mere eye-blink in evolutionary time. In marked contrast to human triumphalism, the great apes have been forced into ever-diminishing habitats, and they too are threatened with extinction.

Many have conjectured about why our species is so dominant on the planet. Assuredly, the reason is mental rather than physicalany number of animals out there can easily beat us in physical combat. Descartes argued that only humans are capable of free will. Aristotle suggested that man is the only political animal, and history suggests that he should have included women. Thomas Willis thought that only humans were capable of laughter, while Martin Luther argued that it was the possession of property that distinguished us. Benjamin Franklin attributed human uniqueness to tool-making, and the Greek philosopher Anaxagoras said it was the human hand that made us the wisest of species. Steven Mithen recently suggested that music may have started it all. Some years ago, in my book

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Recursive Mind»

Look at similar books to The Recursive Mind. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Recursive Mind»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Recursive Mind and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.