Nihil obstat: Rev. J. Brian Bransfield, S.T.D.
All rights reserved.
With the exception of short excerpts used in articles and critical reviews, no part of this work may be reproduced, transmitted, or stored in any form whatsoever, printed or electronic, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Scripture verses contained herein are from the Catholic Edition of the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1965, 1966 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Acknowledgments
I owe a debt of thanks to Edward Cardinal Egan, Archbishop of New York, for his support in allowing me to take time off from my work in New York to write another book on homosexual questions; to the Very Reverend Joseph Morrissey, O.S.F.S., Provincial of the Wilmington-Philadelphia Province of the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales, who granted me permission to live at Ave Maria University while counseling college men in the process of discerning a vocation to the Catholic priesthood; to Mr. Thomas Monaghan, Chancellor of Ave Maria University, for the gift of a fellowship for the purpose of writing this book; to Father Benedict Groeschel, C.F.R., for writing the introduction; to Father Michael Beers, the superior of the pre-theologate program; to Ann Lukomski, who was my secretary in putting this book together; to Dan Hilker, who helped edit the original version of the manuscript; to Tina and Frank at the Courage office for sent documents; to the acting director of Courage, Father James Lloyd, C.S.P.; and to all others who have helped me, particularly the librarians of Ave Maria University.
I also thank the following persons and organizations for permission to reprint material:
Evergreen International and its executive director, David Pruden; Exodus International and its president, Alan Chambers; Homosexuals Anonymous; IHF (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) and its director, Arthur Goldberg; PFOX (Parents and Friends of Ex- Gays and Gays) and its CEO, Regina Griggs for use of materials from their respective websites.
NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) for permission to reprint excerpts from the summary of Linda Nicolosi and Roy Waller of Spitzer Study Just Published Evidence Found in Effectiveness of Reorientation Therapy, NARTH Bulletin , vol. 12, no. 3 (Dec. 2003), pp. 1-2; also for being a channel of references for those working with people of same-sex attraction.
PATH (Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality) for the existence of PATH, which makes it easy for members to cooperate with each other and for the use of the materials used from different members.
Catholic Medical Association for use of my article published in the May 1993 issue of the Linacre Quarterly entitled The Pastoral Problem of Masturbation.
Maggie Gallagher and Joshua Baker for their contribution from the social sciences in defense of the rights of the child and of the institution of traditional marriage in the best interests of the child, in chapter 4.
Professor Gerard Bradley for his argument against gay marriage in chapter 4, and for his article, The Court Will Amend the Constitution If Congress Doesnt, National Review Online , April 14, 2005.
Kenneth D. Whitehead for his article, Why Same-Sex Marriage Is a Bad Idea, Catholic World Report , August-September 2004, pp. 56-57.
Zenit Vatican News Service for permission to use two interviews with Zenit: Recognizing and Treating Same-Sex Attractions in Children, November 16, 2003 and Source of Same-Sex Attractions in Children, January 24, 2004.
Susan Brinkmann of the Catholic Standard & Times of Philadelphia who interviewed Vera concerning her reparational group.
Fr. James Knapp, S. J., for the gift of an annotated bibliography.
Foreword
Some time ago, at the conclusion of a reception following the conferral of the sacrament of Confirmation, a mother approached me and asked whether she could speak with me. She began by saying that, while she did not want to offend me, she disagreed with a column I had written in the archdiocesan newspaper. The column was written at the time that the citizens of Missouri were preparing to vote on a referendum to amend the state constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one womanthat is, to ban what has become popularly known as same-sex marriage or gay marriage.
This well-spoken mother told me that she was offended because my article implied that her daughter was evil. She went on to explain that her daughter, who is in her early twenties, had graduated from a private Catholic high school with highest honors and with many awards. She has been active in a same-sex relationship for some time. With great emotion, the mother declared her love for her daughter, which, according to her way of thinking, requires acceptance and support of her daughters same-sex relationship, including welcoming her daughter and her same-sex partner into the family home.
I explained to the mother that I have never thought nor written that persons suffering from same-sex attraction are evil. I went on to summarize what I had written in the column to which she referred, namely, that same-sex attraction itself is disorderedthat is, contrary to Gods plan for us as male and female; that homosexual acts are intrinsically evil; and that persons with same-sex attraction are our brothers and sisters, whom we are to respect and love. The mother continued to insist that she loves her daughter and, therefore, will support her in her same-sex relationship.
The conversation in question reminded me of several pastoral situations in which I have found a parent struggling painfully with the homosexual activity of a child. The emotion of the situation can understandably cloud ones judgment. Whereas in the past, such emotion may have led parents to reject a child suffering with the homosexual condition or to pretend that the condition did not exist, today there is a tendency for parents to believe that tolerance requires them to accept the homosexual activity of their child and even permit it in the family home.
Given the strong public rhetoric favoring the acceptance of same-sex attraction and homosexual activity as an alternative form of human sexuality, the very presentation of the Catholic Churchs perennial teaching on the matter is considered, at best, failing in pastoral sensitivity; at worst, hateful toward persons who struggle with same-sex attraction. The theological truth is seen to be somehow antithetical to the pastoral or loving response required. For that reason, Catholic faithful, including the clergy, can become hesitant to present and clearly uphold the Churchs teaching on homosexual inclinations and activity. At the same time, the persistent public message about homosexualityin the absence of a consistent presentation of the Churchs teachingcan easily lead the Catholic faithful into confused and even erroneous thinking on the matter.
As at no other time, our society and culture needs to hear the voice of the Church, teaching the divine natural moral law, which safeguards the common good and, therefore, the good of each individual. There can be no pastorally sensitive or loving approach which is not fully informed by and consistent with the teaching of the Church. What is needed is the conviction that the truth communicated with love is the fullest expression of our love and compassion toward every brother and sister.