• Complain

Tibor Kiss - SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3

Here you can read online Tibor Kiss - SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2015, publisher: De Gruyter Mouton, genre: Home and family. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Tibor Kiss SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3

SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This Handbook represents the development of research and the current level of knowledge in the fields of syntactic theory and syntax analysis. Syntax can look back to a long tradition. Especially in the last 50 years, however, the interaction between syntactic theory and syntactic analysis has led to a rapid increase in analyses and theoretical suggestions. This second edition of the Handbook on Syntax adopts a unifying perspective and therefore does not place the division of syntactic theory into several schools to the fore, but the increase in knowledge resulting from the fruitful argumentations between syntactic analysis and syntactic theory.

It uses selected phenomena of individual languages and their cross-linguistic realizations to explain what syntactic analyses can do and at the same time to show in what respects syntactic theories differ from each other.
It investigates how syntax is related to neighbouring disciplines and investigate the role of the
interfaces especially the relationship between syntax and phonology, morphology, compositional semantics, pragmatics, and the lexicon.

The phenomena chosen bring together renowned experts in syntax, and
represent the consensus reached as to what has to be considered as an important as well as illustrative syntactic phenomenon. The phenomena discuss do not only serve to show syntactic analyses, but also to compare theoretical approaches with each other.

Tibor Kiss: author's other books


Who wrote SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Syntax Theory and Analysis
HSK 42.3

Handbcher zur
Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft

Handbooks of Linguistics
and Communication Science

Manuels de linguistique et
des sciences de communication

Mitbegrndet von Gerold Ungeheuer
Mitherausgegeben (19852001) von Hugo Steger

Herausgegeben von / Edited by / Edits par
Herbert Ernst Wiegand

Band 42.3

De Gruyter Mouton

ISBN 978-3-11-036298-5 e-ISBN PDF 978-3-11-036368-5 e-ISBN EPUB - photo 1

ISBN 978-3-11-036298-5
e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-036368-5
e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-039315-6
ISSN 1861-5090

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress.

Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek

The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de .

2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

www.degruyter.com

This handbook is dedicated to the memory of our dear friend
Ursula Kleinhenz (19652010).

The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long.

VII. Syntactic Sketches
41. German: A Grammatical Sketch
Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the most important grammatical properties of German. A large part of the paper is concerend with the basic clause types of German. I start with the Topological Fields Model, which is very useful as a descriptive tool, but as will be shown not sufficient for a thorough account of German clausal structure. I therefore explain additional theoretical assumptions that were made in order to assign structure to the observable linear sequences. After a sketch of an analysis of the basic sentence patterns in the .

1. Topological fields for description

).

Since all examples in this text are in German the language tag German is - photo 2

Since all examples in this text are in German, the language tag [German] is omitted in the remainder of the text.

The complementizer in ().

Predicative adjectives in copula constructions and resultative constructions - photo 3

Predicative adjectives in copula constructions and resultative constructions pattern with particles and should be assigned to the rechte Satzklammer too () the rechte Satzklammer then consists of the adjective treu faithful and the copula and the resultative predicate ( leer empty) and the matrix verb, respectively:

Additional fields can be identified to the left of the linke Satzklammer and to - photo 4

Additional fields can be identified to the left of the linke Satzklammer and to the right of the rechte Satzklammer . In () the relative clause that modifies Eis ice cream is extraposed. It is located in the Nachfeld post field.

In addition to the fields already discussed Hhle suggested a clause-initial - photo 5

In addition to the fields already discussed, Hhle suggested a clause-initial field for conjunctions like ( und and, oder or, aber but) and a field between this initial field and the Vorfeld for left dislocated elements as for instance der Montag the monday in ( on left dislocation.

Hhle calls the latter field K L It is sometimes also called the Vorvorfeld - photo 6

Hhle calls the latter field K L . It is sometimes also called the Vorvorfeld pre pre field.

The examples above show that not all fields have to be filled in a German clause. For instance, in ().

In imperatives the finite verb is serialized in the linke Satzklammer and the - photo 7

In imperatives the finite verb is serialized in the linke Satzklammer and the Vorfeld may remain empty. In (), there is only a finite verb, that is, only the linke Satzklammer is filled. All other fields are empty.

Sometimes the fact that fields may be unfilled leads to situations in which the assignment to topological fields is not obvious. For instance the rechte Satzklammer is not filled by a verb or verb particle in (). So in principle it could be to the left or to the rechte Satzklammer . The relative clause could be considered as part of the Nachfeld or part of the Mittelfeld , depending on the decision made with respect to the location of the bracket.

Fortunately there is a test that helps to determine the position of the rechte - photo 8

Fortunately, there is a test that helps to determine the position of the rechte Satzklammer . The test is called Rangprobe embedding test and was developed by ) shows that the non-finite verb has to be placed before the relative clause. Placing it after the relative clause results in ungrammaticality:

As was pointed out by contains the non-finite verb gewusst in the rechte - photo 9

As was pointed out by ) contains the non-finite verb gewusst in the rechte Satzklammer and the clause dass du kommst in the Nachfeld .

There is no obvious way to relate the clause type declarative imperative - photo 10

There is no obvious way to relate the clause type (declarative, imperative, interrogative) to the topological fields model. The reason for this is that irrespective of the clause type, all fields can remain empty (Mller 20014a). The Vorfeld is usually filled in declarative main clauses, but it may be empty as in instances of Vorfeldellipse topic drop, see :

On the other hand there are examples in which more than one constituent seems - photo 11

On the other hand there are examples in which more than one constituent seems to be located in the Vorfeld . These will be discussed in .

Similarly, yes/no questions are usually verb-first utterances, as in the second reading of (). But with a question intonation V2 is possible as well:

Conversely V1 sentences are not necessarily questions is an imperative - photo 12

Conversely, V1 sentences are not necessarily questions:

is an imperative Imperatives are not necessarily V1 as 1023 13 - photo 13

() is an imperative.

Imperatives are not necessarily V1, as (: 1023):

13 41 noted there is a variant of the copula that is semantically empty - photo 14

: 13, 41) noted, there is a variant of the copula that is semantically empty and hence it may be omitted if information about tense corresponds to the default value present.

So the sentences in 13 noted questions without a verb are possible - photo 15

().

So the sentences in 13 noted questions without a verb are possible as - photo 16

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3»

Look at similar books to SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3»

Discussion, reviews of the book SYNTAX - THEORY & ANALYSIS HSK 42.3 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.