• Complain

Ilya Zemtsov (editor) - Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika

Here you can read online Ilya Zemtsov (editor) - Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1988, publisher: Routledge, genre: Non-fiction. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1988
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Konstantin Ustinovich Chernenko. a figure wtm appeared to the outside worid as a commonplace Russian bureaucrat cut from the mold of a Gogol short story, was elevated in 1984 to the post of general secretary of the Communist party of the Soviet Union. Thus, a post held by such awesome, fearsome figures as Lenin and Stalin passed into the hands of someone perceived as a nondescript bureaucrat, devoid of ideas or initiative, and crippled by old age and infirmity.A singular merit of this work is that it shows how far from the mark were these perceptions. This is the only full-length treatment of Chernenko. in contrast to the vast tomes written on his five predecessors as well as on the present incumbent, Mkrhail Gorbachev. The work delves into archival materials never before reported in either the East or West. The picture that emerges is not of some run-of-the-mill apparatchik, but of a figure who in the context of the Brezhnev era came forth with ideas that were revolutionary, at least in the sense of a realization of the deep malaise into which Soviet economy and society had fallen.Zemtsovs volume explains the paradox of a servile conservative member of th Politburo becoming an innovative, even courageous, leader during the thirteen fateful months he held Soviet power, ft is a tribute to this effort at reconstruction that what emerges is a rounded human being and not simply a political actor. This analytical study of the transformation of a peasant into a politician fills out a missing link without which the current impulse to reform in the U.S.S.R. is hard to understand or appreciate

Ilya Zemtsov (editor): author's other books


Who wrote Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
CHERNENKO The Last Bolshevik First published 1989 by Transaction Publishers - photo 1
CHERNENKO
The Last Bolshevik
First published 1989 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2019 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
First issued in paperback 2019
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 1989 Taylor & Francis
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 88-19993
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Zemtsov, Ilya.
Chernenko : the last Bolshevik : the Soviet Union on the eve of
Perestroika / Ilya Zemtsov.
p. cm.
Bibliography: p.
Includes index.
ISBN 0-88738-260-6
1. Chernenko, K. U. (Konstantin Ustinovich), 1911- . 2. Soviet
Union Politics and government 1982- 3. Heads of state Soviet
Union Biography. I. Title.
DK275.C45Z46 1988
947.0850924dc19
[B]
88-19993
CIP
ISBN 13: 978-1-138-50801-9 (pbk)
ISBN 13: 978-0-88738-260-4 (hbk)
Contents
Guide
The quirks and caprices of history are often surprising. They often turn mediocre personalities into famous statesmen, or contrariwise, deliver outstanding and original figures to undeserved oblivion.
Chance and circumstance combined to create the image of Chernenko as a mediocre, even pitiable figure. In actuality this image was merely a disguise that enabled him to ascend unnoticed the sharp and slippery slopes of power to the very apex of the Soviet pyramid. He remained in power very briefly, barely more than a year. Nevertheless, without an understanding of the qualities of his personality and the course of his career, modern Soviet history would be incomplete and the nature of the political changes being urged on the Soviet Union by his successor, Gorbachev, less comprehensible.
It was not a simple matter to get rid of the half-truths and misconceptions that had built up around Chernenkos person. Platitudes and superficialities usually prove resistant to the truth. I must admit that in trying to rectify them, I have often relied on evidence that is not public. First, I have relied on my own impressions of the man derived from the few occasions on which I met him. Second, I have made much use of hearsay, of reminiscences and impressions of people who knew Chernenko and worked with him. This does not mean, of course, that I just repeated what I received from such sources. Not at all. Well aware that much about Chernenko that has reached my ears could not be true, I have treated it as a point of departure for indirect inferences rather than as evidence that could be relied upon directly. In drawing such inferences, my familiarity with Soviet history and, in particular, with subcultural peculiarities of the Soviet power elites was of much help. More important by far, however, was public evidence at my disposal: primarily Chernenkos own writings. Not without a certain initial surprise, I found that Chernenkos political views and principles were revealed in them more fully than in his political life-history.
On the whole my purpose has been not to stick doggedly to evidence in search of a rather spurious certitude but to extract from it maximum knowledge, even if hypothetical in character. To explain the process of extracting relatively rich knowledge from relatively poor evidence, let me consider for a while any closed institutionbe it a prison or army barracks or a ship or a boarding schoolas a situational model. The stricter the institutions regimen, the lesser the likelihood of its regulations being violated, which means that once we know the regulations, we are in a position to predict the location and the behavior of any single inmate at any particular time. True, the possiblity of error remains; to the sorrow of professional managers and administrators, there is no such thing in this world as perfect rule enforcement. But under a very strict regimen, the probability of deviation from the rules becomes so small that for practical purposes it can be disregarded. It is exactly the standardization of conduct and the suppression of conflict in closed institutions that leave wide room for the prognostication of individual behavior.
What is true of microsystems, such as closed institutions, is true of macrosystems, such as, for example, totalitarian societies. The USSR is a land of uniformities caused by a variety of factors: indoctrination, regimentation, police terror and resultant intimidation, absence of opportunities for display of individual initiative, and even the imponderable but very tangible mood of all-pervasive grayness of life and boredom. All these factors conspire to obliterate personal differences, whether in attitudes or in behavior, in daily schedules, in interests pursued, and even in human characters and personalities. The only major differentiating factor is that of social roles: entirely different sets of proscriptions and prescriptions regulate, for example, the behavior of high-ranking Communist Party members and of ordinary Soviet citizens. But in either case, the regulations, however different, are highly standardized, covering the minutest details.
In achieving a uniformizing effect, written laws, statutes and regulations are not alone. There are many unwritten rules whose content and modes of enforcement are understood by everyone without verbalization. Furthermore, the cultural gap between the USSR and the rest of the world has resulted in a high degree of cultural uniformity. Meanings attached to human interactions, although tacit, are typically shared across the nation. Likewise, every Soviet citizen is from early days of life exposed to insistent, obtrusive, and strident indoctrination. The contents of this indoctrination may somewhat vary from one level of political initiation to another, but at each level, beginning with the Politburo and ending with some forsaken village lost in the expanses of Siberia, it produces individuals strikingly similar to one another in attitudes and behavior.
And finally, there is intimidation by police terror, always present even if varying in intensity from one period of Soviet history to another. Not without significance for the present book is the fact that police terror was at its ghastly peak during Stalins rule, i.e. in the early days of Chernenkos political career, recounted here in . Although direct evidence pertaining to this period of Chernenkos life has been the poorest, the assumption that in those days he behaved in exactly the same manner as all others at his level of political hierarchy has been the surest.
The reader will be perhaps surprised by my frequent use of verba sentiendi in relation to Chernenko, i.e. by my speaking about what Chernenko thought, felt, experienced, understood, desired, hoped for, or feared. Certainly, such phrases are not to be interpreted as mind reading on my part but merely as expressions of my virtual certainty that under given sets of circumstances Chernenkos mental life was hardly distinguishable from that of others of his social station. Needless to say, the same holds true for my use of
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika»

Look at similar books to Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika»

Discussion, reviews of the book Chernenko, the Last Bolshevik: Soviet Union on the Eve of Perestroika and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.