Arthur Griffiths - Early French Prisons: Le Grand and Le Petit Chatelets, Vincennes-The Bastile-Loches, the Galleys, Revolutionary Prisons

Early French Prisons: Le Grand and Le Petit Chatelets, Vincennes-The Bastile-Loches, the Galleys, Revolutionary Prisons — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Early French Prisons: Le Grand and Le Petit Chatelets, Vincennes-The Bastile-Loches, the Galleys, Revolutionary Prisons" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

1234567...52

Note:

Images of the original pages are available through Internet Archive. See https://archive.org/details/historyromanceof06grif

---

The History and Romance of Crime.
Early French Prisons

An Incident During the Communal Revolts of the Twelfth Century

A noble being strangled in his castle by one of the men of the commune (town) in the twelfth century when the villages at the foot of the castles revolted and wrested charters from their lords, often peacefully but more frequently by bloodshed and brutal practices.

---

EDITION NATIONALE

Limited to one thousand registered and numbered sets.

NUMBER

---

INTRODUCTION

The judicial administration of France had its origin in the Feudal System. The great nobles ruled their estates side by side with, and not under, the King. With him the great barons exercised high justice, extending to life and limb. The seigneurs and great clerics dispensed middle justice and imposed certain corporal penalties, while the power of low justice, extending only to the amende and imprisonment, was wielded by smaller jurisdictions.

The whole history of France is summed up in the persistent effort of the King to establish an absolute monarchy, and three centuries were passed in a struggle between nobles, parliaments and the eventually supreme ruler. Each jurisdiction was supported by various methods of enforcing its authority: All, however, had their prisons, which served many purposes. The prison was first of all a place of detention and durance where people deemed dangerous might be kept out of the way of doing harm and law-breakers could be called to account for their misdeeds. Accused persons were in it held safely until they could be arraigned before the tribunals, and after conviction by legal process were sentenced to the various penalties in force.

The prison was de facto the high road to the scaffold on which the condemned suffered the extreme penalty by one or another of the forms of capital punishment, and death was dealt out indifferently by decapitation, the noose, the stake or the wheel. Too often where proof was weak or wanting, torture was called in to assist in extorting confession of guilt, and again, the same hideous practice was applied to the convicted, either to aggravate their pains or to compel the betrayal of suspected confederates and accomplices. The prison reflected every phase of passing criminality and was the constant home of wrong-doers of all categories, heinous and venial. Offenders against the common law met their just retribution. Many thousands were committed for sins political and non-criminal, the victims of an arbitrary monarch and his high-handed, irresponsible ministers.

The prison was the Kings castle, his stronghold for the coercion and safe-keeping of all who conspired against his person or threatened his peace. It was a social reformatory in which he disciplined the dissolute and the wastrel, the loose-livers of both sexes, who were thus obliged to run straight and kept out of mischief by the stringent curtailment of their liberty. The prison, last of all, played into the hands of the rich against the poor, active champion of the commercial code, taking the side of creditors by holding all debtors fast until they could satisfy the legal, and at times illegal demands made upon them.

Various types of prisons were to be found in France, the simpler kind being gradually enlarged and extended, and more and more constantly utilised as time passed and society became more complex. All had common features and exercised similar discipline. All were of solid construction, relying upon bolts and bars, high walls and hard-hearted, ruthless jailers. The prison rgime was alike in all; commonly starvation, squalor, the sickness of hope deferred, close confinement protracted to the extreme limits of human endurance in dark dungeons, poisonous to health and inducing mental breakdown. In all prisons, penalties followed the same grievous lines. Culprits were subjected to degradation moral and physical, to the exposure of the carcan and pillory. They made public reparation by the amende honorable, were flogged, mutilated, branded and tortured.

Prisons were to be met with throughout the length and breadth of France. The capital had many; every provincial city possessed one or more. In Paris the principal prisons were the two Chtelets, the gaols and, as we should say to-day, the police headquarters of the Provost or chief magistrate of the city. For-lvque was the Bishops court; the Conciergerie, the guardroom of the Kings palace, kept by the concierge, porter or janitor, really the mayor and custodian of the royal residence; in the Temple the powerful and arrogant military order of the Knights Templars had its seat.

The reigning sovereign relied upon the Bastile, at first merely a rampart against invasion and rebellion, but presently exalted into the Kings prison-house, the royal gaol and penitentiary. He had also the donjon of Vincennes, which was first a place of defensive usefulness and next a place of restraint and coercion for State offenders. Other prisons came into existence later: the Madelonnettes, St. Plagie, Bictre, the Salptrire and St. Lazare.

All these have historic interest more or less pronounced and notable. All in their time were the scenes of strange, often terrible episodes and events. All serve to illustrate various curious epochs of the worlds history, but mark more especially the rise, progress, aggrandisement and decadence and final fall of the French monarchy.

---

CONTENTS

CHAPTER	PAGE
5
Origins and Early History	13
Struggle with the Sovereign	35
Vincennes and the Bastile	57
The Rise of Richelieu	90
The People and the Bastile	121
The Man with the Iron Mask	148
The Power of the Bastile	187
The Terror of Poison	210
The Horrors of the Galleys	232
The Dawn of Revolution	263
Last Days of the Bastile	287

[Pg 10]
[Pg 11]

---

List of Illustrations

Frontispiece
Page	54
82
190
250

[Pg 12]
[Pg 13]

---

EARLY FRENCH PRISONS

CHAPTER I
ORIGINS AND EARLY HISTORY

The Feudal SystemEarly prisonsClasses of inmatesAlike in aspect, similar in disciplineVariety of penaltiesChief prisons of Paris in the Middle AgesGreat and Little ChteletsHistory and inmatesThe Conciergerie still standingFor-lvque, the Bishops prisonThe Temple, prison of the Knights TemplarsBictreNotable prisonersSalomon de Caus, steam inventorSt. PlagieSt. Lazare.

Let us consider the prisons of Old France in the order of their antiquity, their size and their general importance in French history.

First of all the two Chtelets, the greater and less, Le Grand and Le Petit Chtelet, of which the last named was probably the earliest in date of erection. Antiquarians refer the Petit Chtelet to the Roman period and state that its original use was to guard the entrance to Paris when the city was limited to that small island in the Seine which was the nucleus of the great capital of France. This fortress and bridge-head was besieged and destroyed by the Normans but was subsequently rebuilt; and it is mentioned in a deed dated 1222 in which the king, Philip Augustus, took over the rights of justice, at a price, from the Bishop of Paris. It stood then on the south bank of the Seine at the far end of the bridge long afterwards known as the Petit Pont. Both bridge and castle were swept away in 1296 by an inundation and half a century elapsed before they were restored on such a firm basis as to resist any future overflowing of the Seine. At this date its rle as a fortress appears to have ceased and it was appropriated by Charles V of France to serve as a prison and to overawe the students of the Quartier Latin. Hugues Aubriot, the same Provost of Paris who built the Bastile, constructed several cells between the pillars supporting the Petit Chtelet and employed them for the confinement of turbulent scholars of the university.

Next page

1234567...52

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Early French Prisons: Le Grand and Le Petit Chatelets, Vincennes-The Bastile-Loches, the Galleys, Revolutionary Prisons»

Look at similar books to Early French Prisons: Le Grand and Le Petit Chatelets, Vincennes-The Bastile-Loches, the Galleys, Revolutionary Prisons. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.

Arthur Griffiths

German and Austrian Prisons

Arthur Griffiths

Russian Prisons: Detective Masters

David Scott

Prisons Punishment

Arthur Griffiths

Prisons Over Seas

Pia Maria Jolliffe

Prisons and Forced Labour in Japan: The Colonization of Hokkaido, 1881-1894

Arthur Griffiths

Spanish Prisons

A. Cooper

In and Out of Rebel Prisons

Sean McConville

English Local Prisons, 1860-1900: Next Only to Death

Geoffrey Howse

A History of Londons Prisons

Howse

A History of Londons Prisons

Stephen Ware

Notorious Prisons of the World

Alec P. Spencer

Working With Sex Offenders in Prisons and Through Release to the Community: A Handbook (Forensic Focus)

Discussion, reviews of the book Early French Prisons: Le Grand and Le Petit Chatelets, Vincennes-The Bastile-Loches, the Galleys, Revolutionary Prisons and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.