• Complain

Margaret Weir - The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government

Here you can read online Margaret Weir - The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1998, publisher: Brookings Inst Pr, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Brookings Inst Pr
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1998
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The extraordinary swings in the scope and content of the policy agenda during the first Clinton administration revealed a fundamental partisan divide over the social role of the federal government. This book argues that the recent conflicts over social policy represent key elements in strategies that parties designed in an attempt to consolidate their hold over the federal government. Long frustrated by divided government, each party exceeded its electoral mandate in hopes of enacting major policy reforms aimed to shift politics in their direction for the foreseeable future.The book traces the overreaching and limited legislative success that characterized the first Clinton administrations approach to three distinctive features of politics and policymaking: the polarization of political elites; the predominance of advertising campaigns and intense interest group politics as political parties have ceased to mobilize ordinary people; and the unprecedented role that budgetary concerns now play in social policymaking. Although neither party managed to enact its major transforming agenda, Congress did pass new policies--most notably welfare reform--that together with a host of other changes in the states and the private sector altered the landscape for social policy. The poor have been the biggest losers as Democrats and Republicans have fought to win the middle class over to their vision of the future. The authors first analyze the institutions and tools of policymaking, including Congress, the political use of public opinion polling, and the politics of the deficit. They then consider policies designed to win over the middle class, including health care policy, employer-provided social benefits, wages and jobs, and crime policy. Last, they address policies targeted at the disadvantaged, including welfare, affirmative action, and urban policy.

Margaret Weir: author's other books


Who wrote The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
title The Social Divide Political Parties and the Future of Activist - photo 1

title:The Social Divide : Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government
author:Weir, Margaret,1952-
publisher:Brookings Institution Press
isbn10 | asin:0815792883
print isbn13:9780815792888
ebook isbn13:9780585098814
language:English
subjectUnited States--Social policy--1993- , United States--Politics and government--1993- , Political parties--United States.
publication date:1998
lcc:HN59.2.S59 1998eb
ddc:361.6/1/0973
subject:United States--Social policy--1993- , United States--Politics and government--1993- , Political parties--United States.
Page iii
The Social Divide
Political Parties and the Future
of Activist Government
MARGARET WEIR
Editor
Brookings Institution Press/Washington, D.C.
Russell Sage Foundation/New York, N.Y.
Page iv
Copyright 1998 by
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION
The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government
may be ordered from:
Brookings Institution Press
1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Tel.: 1-800-275-1447 or (202) 797-6258
Fax: (202) 797-6004
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced
or transmitted in any means without permission from the
Brookings Institution Press.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data:
The social divide: political parties and the future of
activist government / Margaret Weir, editor
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8157-9288-3 (cloth: alk. paper). ISBN
0-8157-9287-5 (pbk. : alk. paper).
1. United StatesSocial policy1993- . 2. United
StatesPolitics and government1993- . 3. Political
partiesUnited States. I. Weir, Margaret, 1952- .
HN59.2.S59 1998
361.610973dc21Picture 2Picture 3Picture 4Picture 597-33819
Picture 6Picture 7Picture 8Picture 9Picture 10Picture 11CIP
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the
American National Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper
for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984
Typeset in Palatino
Composition by Cynthia Stock
Silver Spring, Maryland
Printed by R. R. Donnelley and Sons, Co.
Harrisonburg, Virginia
Page v
PREFACE
THIS BOOK had its origins in the first months of the Clinton administration, when Eric Wanner, president of the Russell Sage Foundation, invited a group of political scientists to consider how politics might affect social policymaking during the new administration. We began with a question about Clinton's ambitiousand ambiguousaspirations to be a new kind of Democrat: would this political impulse create a new generation of social policy that could actively respond to the new social and economic challenges at the century's end? Answering this question required us to identify the distinctive features of the contemporary American political system that shape policymaking and to make sense of the strategies that politicians adopt as they thread their way through this maze of political obstacles and opportunities. Meeting six times over the course of four years, we tracked the progress of key pieces of social policy and collectively monitored the often surprising political developments.
The most striking feature of policymaking across issues was its contentious and intensely partisan character. This highly politicized process, combined with the deeply entrenched institutional barriers to change, prevented the emergence of anything as coherent as a new generation of social policy. But neither can the outcome of these years of intense political conflict be characterized as a stalemate. Instead, a patchwork of failures and achievements underscore the way politics has restricted the range of tools that American policymakers use to respond to new social and economic conditions. Among the features of politics the chapters of this book highlight are sharply divided partisan elites, the difficulty of organizing broad majorities to participate effectively, and the dominance of budgetary politics. These factors made it extremely difficult to negotiate trade-offs or to bring expertise and broad public engagement to bear on policymaking. The result has been to restrict what
Page vi
the federal government can do to promote opportunity and security for all Americans; the most immediate consequence has been to increase greatly the insecurity of the poor. At the same time, policymaking during the Clinton administration has done little to build public support for the idea that government has a role to play in helping Americans as they confront new insecurities. In the face of social and economic trends that are increasing inequality and exacerbating insecurity, the current path is more likely to widen rather than bridge the growing social divide.
Over the course of this project I have benefited from the advice and expertise of many colleagues. The greatest debt is to Eric Wanner of the Russell Sage Foundation, who provided generous financial support and challenged us to keep our eyes on the big picture as we sought to make sense of rapidly shifting political events. At the Brookings Institution, Thomas E. Mann, provided critical support and guidance as well as a congenial work setting in his role as director of the Governmental Studies program; as a leading scholar of politics in Washington, he offered astute advice that greatly strengthened the manuscript. Ira Katznelson was instrumental in helping think through the project from the beginning, and, as a participant in our meetings, he prodded us to think more acutely about our political analysis. I also benefited from the comments of several scholars who participated in a stimulating two-day conference that was critical in giving the book its current shape. They included Demetrios Caraley, Martha Derthick, Morris Fiorina, James G. Gimpel, Hugh Heclo, Jennifer L. Hochschild, Ira Katznelson, Thomas E. Mann, Theodore R. Marmor, David Plotke, Theda Skocpol, Phillip Thompson, Carl E. Van Horn, and Joseph White. Hugh Heclo provided written comments that proved invaluable in making the separate contributions more systematic and comprehensive. I, as well as the other authors, am also grateful to the many administration officials and congressional staff who agreed to individual interviews and to several who held off-the-record meetings with the entire group.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government»

Look at similar books to The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Social Divide: Political Parties and the Future of Activist Government and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.