• Complain

Jonah Goldberg - The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas

Here you can read online Jonah Goldberg - The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Sentinel, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Jonah Goldberg The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas
  • Book:
    The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Sentinel
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The bestselling author of Liberal Fascism dismantles the progressive myths that are passed-off as wisdom in our schools, media and politics.


According to Jonah Goldberg, if the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didnt exist, the greatest trick liberals ever pulled was convincing themselves that theyre not ideological.


Today, objective journalists, academics and moderate politicians peddle some of the most radical arguments by hiding them in homespun aphorisms. Barack Obama casts himself as a disciple of reason and sticks to one refrain above all others: hes a pragmatist, opposed to the ideology and dogma of the right, solely concerned with what works. And todays liberals follow his lead, spouting countless clichs such as:

  • One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter: Sure, if the other man is an idiot. Was Martin Luther King Jr. a terrorist? Was Bin Laden a freedom fighter?
  • Violence never solves anything: Really? It solved our problems with the British empire and ended slavery.
  • Better ten guilty men go free than one innocent man suffer: So you wont mind if those ten guilty men move next door to you?
  • Diversity is strength: Cool.The NBA should have a quota for midgets and one-legged point guards!
  • We need complete separation of church and state: In other words all expressions of faith should be barred from politics except when they support liberal programs.

With humor and passion, Goldberg dismantles these and many other Trojan Horses that liberals use to cheat in the war of ideas. He shows that the grand Progressive tradition of denying an ideological agenda while pursuing it vigorously under the false-flag of reasonableness is alive and well. And he reveals how this dangerous game may lead us further down the path of self-destruction.

Jonah Goldberg: author's other books


Who wrote The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

The Tyranny of Clichs

Picture 1

The Tyranny of Clichs

How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas

JONAH GOLDBERG

Sentinel

SENTINEL

Published by the Penguin Group

Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 375 Hudson Street,

New York, New York 10014, U.S.A.

Penguin Group (Canada), 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 700,

Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4P 2Y3

(a division of Pearson Penguin Canada Inc.)

Penguin Books Ltd, 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England

Penguin Ireland, 25 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

(a division of Penguin Books Ltd)

Penguin Books Australia Ltd, 250 Camberwell Road, Camberwell,

Victoria 3124, Australia

(a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd)

Penguin Books India Pvt Ltd, 11 Community Centre, Panchsheel Park,

New Delhi110 017, India

Penguin Group (NZ), 67 Apollo Drive, Rosedale, Auckland 0632,

New Zealand (a division of Pearson New Zealand Ltd)

Penguin Books (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd, 24 Sturdee Avenue,

Rosebank, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa

Penguin Books Ltd, Registered Offices: 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England

First published in 2012 by Sentinel, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.

1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

Copyright Jonah Goldberg, 2012

All rights reserved

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Goldberg, Jonah.

The tyranny of clichs : How liberals cheat in the war of ideas / Jonah Goldberg.

pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN: 978-1-101-57235-1

1. LiberalismUnited States. 2. ClichsUnited States. I. Title.

JC574.2.U6G64 2012

320.5130973dc23

2012000535

Printed in the United States of America

Set in Bell MT Std

Designed by Spring Hoteling

No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of the authors rights. Purchase only authorized editions.

While the author has made every effort to provide accurate telephone numbers and Internet addresses at the time of publication, neither the publisher nor the author assumes any responsibility for errors, or for changes that occur after publication. Further, publisher does not have any control over and does not assume any responsibility for author or third-party Web sites or their content.

ALWAYS LEARNING

PEARSON

To the memory of my big brother, Josh

INTRODUCTION

[W]e have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.

G EORGE O RWELL , T HE C OLLECTED E SSAYS , J OURNALISM AND L ETTERS OF G EORGE O RWELL

The Cowardice of Clichs

According to legend, when George Will signed up to become a syndicated columnist in the 1970s, he asked his friend William F. Buckley, Jr.the founder of National Review and a columnist himselfHow will I ever write two columns a week? Buckley responded (Im paraphrasing), Oh it will be easy. At least two things a week will annoy you, and youll write about them.

Buckley was right. Annoyance is an inspiration, aggravation a muse. That which gets your blood up, also gets the inkor these days, pixelsflowing. Show me an author without passion for what he holds to be the truth and I will show you either a boring writer or someone who misses a lot of deadlines, or both. Nothing writes itself, and what gets the writer to push that boulder uphill is more often than not irritation with those saying wrong things righteously.

Which brings me to this book. Theres a kind of argument-that-isnt-an-argument that vexes me. I first started to notice it on university campuses. Ive spoken to a lot of college audiences. Often, I will encounter an earnest student, much more serious looking than the typical hippie with open-toed shoes and a closed mind. During the Q&A session after my speech he will say something like Mr. Goldberg, I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Then he will sit down, and the audience will applaud. Faculty will nod proudly at this wiser-than-his-years hatchling under their wings. What a glorious moment for everybody. Blessed are the bridge builders.

My response? Who gives a rats ass?

First of all, my right to speak never was in doubt. Indeed, Im usually paid to speak. Besides, Ive given my speech already and were in Q&A time: Shouldnt you have told me this beforehand? Second, the kid is almost surely lying. Hell take a bullet for me? Really?

Clichs like these are a way to earn bravery on the cheap, defending principles you havent thought through or perhaps only vaguely support. Or, heck, maybe he really would leap on a grenade so I could finish talking about how stupid high-speed rail is. But it still doesnt matter, because mouthing these sorts of clichs is away to avoid arguments, not make them. Imagine a defendant is on the stand. The prosecutor peppers the accused murderer with questions: Is this your chain saw? Where were you on the night of the fourteenth? How can you explain the victims foot being in your freezer?

Now imagine the defendant responds, Sir, I may disagree with your line of questioning, but I will defend to the death your right to ask me these things.

The prosecutor, if hes not a complete idiot, will say, Stop trying to change the subject and answer my questions.

One last point about I may disagree with you but Ill defend to the death your right to say it: The implication is not only that the person saying this is brave but also that we live in a society where such bravery might be required. It suggests that speech is so imperiled that bloodshed may be called for. Many people think thats how the phrase was born, that theyre echoing the heroism of some forgotten general or martyr willing to sacrifice himself for the liberty of others. But theyre wrong.

The phrase is usually attributed to Voltaire, though he didnt say it. It was a historians paraphrasing of Voltaires attitude, written more than a century after Voltaires death. And even his attitude wasnt all that sincere. According to S. G. Tallentyres The Friends of Voltaire, the quote traces itself back to a hullaballoo over a book by the French utilitarian philosopher Claude Adrien Helvtius. The book, De lEspirit, argued that people behave the way they do out of a desire to avoid pain or feel pleasure. Or something. Regardless, everyone hated the book, including Voltaire (who took offense at what he considered to be the authors insufficient praise of him). De lEspirit was essentially ignored until the dauphin, the kings son, read it. He really hated it. Parliament ended up banning it. The tome was even publicly burned. Like a 1920s book that could catapult its sales by being Banned in Boston!, De lEspirit became a sensation, translated into every language imaginable, precisely because it had been censored. And, just as suddenly, Helvtius became a celebrity, his salon instantly fashionable.

What the book could never have done for itself, or for its author, persecution did for them both, writes Tallentyre.

The men who had hated it, and had not particularly loved Helvtius, flocked round him now. Voltaire forgave him all injuries, intentional or unintentional. What a fuss about an omelette! [Voltaire] had exclaimed when he heard of the burning. How abominably unjust to persecute a man for such an airy trifle as that! I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it, was his attitude now.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas»

Look at similar books to The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.