• Complain

Christopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg - The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions

Here you can read online Christopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg - The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Princeton University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Christopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions

The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Do women participate in and influence meetings equally with men? Does gender shape how a meeting is run and whose voices are heard? The Silent Sex shows how the gender composition and rules of a deliberative body dramatically affect who speaks, how the group interacts, the kinds of issues the group takes up, whose voices prevail, and what the group ultimately decides. It argues that efforts to improve the representation of women will fall short unless they address institutional rules that impede womens voices.Using groundbreaking experimental research supplemented with analysis of school boards, Christopher Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg demonstrate how the effects of rules depend on womens numbers, so that small numbers are not fatal with a consensus process, but consensus is not always beneficial when there are large numbers of women. Men and women enter deliberative settings facing different expectations about their influence and authority. Karpowitz and Mendelberg reveal how the wrong institutional rules can exacerbate womens deficit of authority while the right rules can close it, and, in the process, establish more cooperative norms of group behavior and more generous policies for the disadvantaged. Rules and numbers have far-reaching implications for the representation of women and their interests.Bringing clarity and insight to one of todays most contentious debates, The Silent Sex provides important new findings on ways to bring womens voices into the conversation on matters of common concern.

Christopher F. Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg: author's other books


Who wrote The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Silent Sex The Silent Sex GENDER DELIBERATION AND INSTITUTIONS - photo 1

The Silent Sex

The Silent Sex

GENDER, DELIBERATION, AND INSTITUTIONS

Christopher F. Karpowitz
and
Tali Mendelberg

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

PRINCETON AND OXFORD

Copyright 2014 by Princeton University Press
Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street,
Princeton, New Jersey 08540

In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street,
Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW

press.princeton.edu

Jacket photograph Africa Studio/Shutterstock. Jacket design by Lorraine Doneker.

All Rights Reserved

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Karpowitz, Christopher F., 1969

The silent sex : gender, deliberation, and
institutions / Christopher F. Karpowitz, Tali Mendelberg.
pages cm
Summary: Do women participate in and influence meetings equally with men? Does gender shape how a meeting is run and whose voices are heard? The Silent Sex shows how the gender composition and rules of a deliberative body dramatically affect who speaks, how the group interacts, the kinds of issues the group takes up, whose voices prevail, and what the group ultimately decides. It argues that efforts to improve the representation of women will fall short unless they address institutional rules that impede womens voices. Using groundbreaking experimental research supplemented with analysis of school boards, Christopher Karpowitz and Tali Mendelberg demonstrate how the effects of rules depend on womens numbers, so that small numbers are not fatal with a consensus process, but consensus is not always beneficial when there are large numbers of women. Men and women enter deliberative settings facing different expectations about their influence and authority. Karpowitz and Mendelberg reveal how the wrong institutional rules can exacerbate womens deficit of authority while the right rules can close it, and, in the process, establish more cooperative norms of group behavior and more generous policies for the disadvantaged. Rules and numbers have far-reaching implications for the representation of women and their interests. Bringing clarity and insight to one of todays most contentious debates, The Silent Sex provides important new findings on ways to bring womens voices into the conversation on matters of common concernProvided by publisher.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-691-15975-1 (hardback) ISBN 978-0-691-15976-8 (paperback) 1. Corporate meetings. 2. Women. 3. Social participation. 4. Social interaction. 5. Social groups 6. Social psychology. I. Mendelberg, Tali. II. Title.
HD2743.K295 2014
302.35dc23
2014008938

British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available

This book has been composed in Minion and Avant Garde

Printed on acid-free paper.

Printed in the United States of America
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

To Caleb, Quinn,
Cami, and Zach,
and to Leora and Dani

our children, whose beloved voices are created equal.

Contents

Illustrations

Tables

Acknowledgments

T HIS PROJECT HAS BEEN A LONG-TERM UNDERTAKING, and we are extremely grateful to the many people who made it possible. First we thank our families for their love and support. Tali wishes to thank her parents, Hava and Uri Mendelberg, her brother and sister-in-law, Gabi and Jill Mendelberg, and her daughters, Leora and Daniella Paradise. She also thanks her dear friends Gil Blitz and Jody Kirtner for their encouragement. Chris thanks his parents, Dennis and Diane Karpowitz, his five siblings, his children Caleb, Quinn, Cami, and Zach, and above all his unfailingly supportive wife, Jordan.

We want to thank our coauthors on parts of this book that originate in papers: Lee Shaker on verbal participation, Nick Goedert on issue mentions, and Baxter Oliphant on interruptions. We owe Baxter an extra debt of gratitude for the many difficult hours he put in to assist with the challenging coding of interruptions. Each started out as a dedicated research assistant and transitioned into a collaborator, and we are very grateful for each phase of our association with them.

We received invaluable feedback and encouragement from colleagues. First we wish to thank Marty Gilens, an exemplary colleague and friend who read every word, took the time to really think things through, and provided essential guidance. We are also extremely grateful to Amy Lerman, Chris Achen, Markus Prior, Susan Fiske, and Pat Egan, who read the draft manuscript and spent a full day discussing it with us. The faculty research seminar at Brigham Young University provided especially helpful early feedback on several chapters, and the enthusiasm of the BYU faculty for the project encouraged us to press forward. Valerie Hudson and Jessica Preece served as insightful discussants at these events, and Dan Nielson offered generous and wise insights on early versions of several chapters. BYU colleagues Jeremy Pope, Quin Monson, and Kelly Patterson provided unstinting support and encouragement at multiple points along the way. Kathy Cramer Walsh, Michele Epstein, Amaney Jamal, Cindy Kam, Yanna Krupnikov, Nan Keohane, Jane Mansbridge, and Steve Macedo also provided helpful comments on parts of this project. Additional helpful comments came from the West Coast Experiments Conference, the NYU CESS Experiments Conference, Princeton Universitys CSDP seminar, and participants at various meetings and workshops, including the Harvard Kennedy School Women in Public Policy Program. We thank our former editor Chuck Myers for his ongoing interest in the project and for an insightful conversation that prompted us to conduct our analysis of school boards. Two reviewers for the Princeton University Press provided extremely helpful suggestions for revision. Tali also wishes to thank Lynn Sanders and Oliver Avens for early stimulating conversations on deliberation, and Don Kinder and Virginia Sapiro for formative teaching. We both thank Larry Bartels for his generous mentorship.

Funding was generously provided by the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, BYU (including a Mentored Environment Grant and substantial support from the College of Family, Home, and Social Sciences, the Political Science Department, and the Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy), and Princeton University (we especially thank former chairs Jeff Herbst and Helen Milner, the Bobst Center and the CSDP). Money cant buy you love, but it buys nearly everything elselabor, which leads to time, which leads to mental focus, which leads to creativity and productivity.

We were also fortunate to have the help of talented undergraduate and graduate assistants. We thank Dan Myers, Lisa Argyle, and Oleg Bespalov for running many of the sessions. Quite simply, our rich data set would not exist without their long hours and commitment to the project. Early assistance came from Steve Howell, Dusan Zaric, and Jason Teeple. We are indebted to Jesse Mudrick for spending a year of his life listening to and deciphering phrases such as yeah, you know, that thought, but what if, I agree, we wouldnt want, not that, you know, umm, [unintelligible]. Kabir Khanna provided careful, smart, and extremely helpful edits on the final manuscript. We also thank Matt Barnes, Joy Yang, Adriana Estor, Lois Lee, Oliver Bloom, Dan Chen, Alex Simon, Gabriela Gonzalez, Hayden Galloway, Josephine Borich Shipley, Bobby Purks, Krista Frederico, Greg Baker, Alex Bitter, Ashley Erickson, Jason Harrington, Kris Mahoney, Brooke Rieder, Michael Sheflo, Katherine McCabe, Luke Bell, the invaluable Chris McConnell, and Kyrene Gibb, who is suited to run a country or at least a corporationwe are incredibly lucky that she put her formidable talents to work managing our challenging though comparatively puny school boards project.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions»

Look at similar books to The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.