Davood Gozli - Experimental Psychology and Human Agency

Cover Image The Print Collector / Alamy Stock Photo

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG

The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

Critique of an activity is a form of engagement with the activity, which stimulates new ways of thinking about it. Good critique does not come from a will to dismiss. Neither does it come from pessimism or despair. That is not to say that critics should find no trace of pessimism in their minds but that pessimism does not have to be the only, or the primary, force behind their work. Critique can be grounded in hope and commitment. It can be the expression of ones attachment to ones tradition. Critics might be less certain and less engrossed in the assumptions of their tradition, but they are not necessarily less attached or less engaged. The present book, despite its critical approach, is written in a spirit of hopeful engagement. It reflects my effort to become aware of, and to make explicit, the assumptions and practices of my tradition of research.

To claim that critique of an activity is possible, or useful, is to claim that the activity can be done unreflectively, without regard for its significance within the larger context or its direction in the long run. Such a sentiment applies to experimental psychology, in which most of us begin our careers as research assistants. A research assistant begins contributing to a field of research without fully understanding its aims and scope and without the ability to evaluate its progress. A research assistant, for understandable reasons, begins with trust. This trust is placed not only in research activities, but also in the means of evaluating success and merit (e.g., number of publications). We might presuppose that as we continue our training, and while moving up the chain of command, we transition from unknowing and unreflective participants into reflective and knowing investigators, equipped with better means of evaluation, mindful of the broader context and long-term directions. What does such a transition require? Salesmanship, unconditional defense of ones field and ones career, might succeed in keeping a field alive, but it does not produce reflective investigators. What is required is critique. This book makes a case for the place and value of critique in experimental psychology.

Holding unpopular positions becomes easier with the support of friends and colleagues. I would like to thank Bernhard Hommel and Lilith Dorko for encouraging me to write this book. I would also like to thank Lei Chang, Head of Psychology at University of Macau, for giving me a job and the freedom to break the mould. Roland Pfister, Matt Hilchey, and Paul Seli were among the first who noticed the change in my writing and their comments encouraged me to continue. Thanks also to Jason Rajsic and Greg Huffman, my former lab mates at the University of Toronto, who have kept our stimulating conversations alive despite geographic distance. The same goes for my friends, Thomas Camus, Peter Limberg, Siavash Kazemian, Daniel Kazandjian, and my doctoral advisor, Jay Pratt. I would also like to express thanks to Raymond Bergner, Bruno Bocanegra, Sophia Deng, Nevia Dolcini, Fiona Hibberd, Bryant Jongkees, Jens Mammen, Hyojin Pak, Fenna Poletiek, Roberta Sellaro, Vivienne Tao, Carol Ting, Sara Yanny-Tillar, and Kathy Worthington. I am thankful to my parents, Mina and Kurosh, and my siblings, Pooya and Saba, for their unwavering love and support. Finally, I am grateful to my beloved wife, Kay Wong, for helping me remain resilient and lighthearted.