Thank you so much for picking up this book. It is truly an honor to be able to share the updated edition of What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20 with you.
The original book came out in the Spring of 2009, the week of my son Joshs twentieth birthday. As we approached the ten-year anniversary of the book, I read it through again. It was a treat to experience the words with fresh eyes and fascinating to see which concepts and stories stood the test of time. Most had; some were dated. And with ten years of additional experience, I knew more than I did when I wrote the first edition. Therefore, I asked my publisher if I could write a ten-year anniversary edition of the book. To my delight, they said yes!
This edition has a structure similar to the original, with many new examples drawn both from my classroom and from innovators operating in different settings. Additionally, I have included many new insights gained over the last decade. There are two additional chapters to accommodate all of the new material.
Overall, my objective as an educator and in this book is to be a provocateurto ask questions, tell stories, and set up scenarios that lead to surprising insights. In my classroom, my hope is that every student is changed by each experience, feeling more empowered by the exercises and concepts that are presented. The goal of this book is the same. I hope that after reading it you will have an enlarged set of tools for seeing and seizing the opportunities around you.
This edition will come out on Joshs thirtieth birthday. Im forever grateful to him for inspiring me to write. Im also very appreciative of the students and colleagues with whom Ive had the privilege to learn over the years.
Please feel free to reach out to me with your reactions. I welcome feedback and look forward to hearing which parts of the book are most meaningful to you. I can be reached at tseelig@gmail.com or via my website at tinaseelig.com. You can also follow me on Twitter @tseelig.
.
What would you do to earn money if all you had was five dollars and two hours? This is the assignment I gave students in my very first course at the Stanford d.school. The rules were simple: each of fourteen teams received an envelope with five dollars of seed funding and was told they could spend as much time as they wanted planning. However, once they cracked open the envelope, they had two hours to generate as much money as possible. I gave them from Wednesday afternoon until Sunday evening to complete the assignment. Then, on Sunday evening, each team had to send me one slide describing what they had done, and on Monday afternoon each team had three minutes to present their project to the class. They were encouraged to be entrepreneurial by identifying opportunities, challenging assumptions, leveraging the limited resources they had, and being creative.
What would you do if you were given this challenge? When I ask this question to most groups, someone usually shouts out Go to Las Vegas or Buy a lottery ticket. This gets a big laugh. These folks would take a significant risk in return for a small chance of earning a big reward. The next most common suggestion is to set up a car wash or lemonade stand, using the five dollars to purchase starting materials. This is a fine option for anyone interested in earning a few extra dollars of spending money in two hours. But most of the students eventually found a way to move far beyond the standard responses. They took seriously the challenge to question traditional assumptions, exposing a wealth of possibilities, in order to create as much value as possible.
How did they do this? Heres a clue: the teams that made the most money didnt use the five dollars at all. They realized that focusing on the money actually framed the problem way too tightly. They understood that five dollars is nearly nothing and decided to reinterpret the problem more broadly: What can you do to make money if you start with nothing?
They ramped up their observation skills, tapped into their talents, and unlocked their creativity to identify problems in their midstproblems they experienced or noticed others experiencing, problems they might have seen before but had never thought to solve. These problems were nagging but not necessarily at the forefront of anyones mind. By unearthing these problems and then working to solve them, the winning team brought in more than six hundred dollars, and the average return on the five-dollar investment was 4,000 percent! If you take into account that many of the teams didnt use the funds at all, then their financial returns were infinite.
So, what did they do?
One group identified a problem common in a lot of college townsthe frustratingly long lines at popular restaurants on Saturday nights. The team decided to help those people who didnt want to wait in line. They paired off and booked reservations at several restaurants. As the times for their reservations approached, they sold each reservation for up to twenty dollars to customers who were happy to avoid a long wait.
As the evening wore on, the students made several interesting observations. First, they realized that the female students were better at selling the reservations than the male students, probably because customers were more comfortable being approached by the young women. They adjusted their plan so that the male students ran around town making reservations at different restaurants while the female students sold those places in line. They also learned that the entire operation worked best at restaurants that use vibrating pagers to alert customers when their table is ready. Physically swapping pagers with those who received one later made customers feel as though they were receiving something tangible for their money. They were more comfortable handing over their money and pager in exchange for the new pager. This had an additional bonusteams could then sell the newly acquired pager as the later reservation time grew nearer.
Another team took an even simpler approach. They set up a stand in front of the student union where they offered to measure bicycle tire pressure for free. If the tires needed filling, they added air for one dollar. At first they thought they were taking advantage of their fellow students, who could easily go to a nearby gas station to have their tires filled. But after their first few customers, the students realized the bicyclists were incredibly grateful. Even though the cyclists could get their tires filled for free nearby, and the task was easy for the students to perform, the students were providing a convenient and valuable service. In fact, halfway through the two-hour period, the team stopped asking for a specific payment and requested donations instead. Their income soared! They made much more when their customers were reciprocating for a free service than when asked to pay a fixed price. For this team, as well as for the team making restaurant reservations, experimenting along the way paid off. The iterative process, in which small changes are made in response to customer feedback, allowed them to optimize their strategy on the fly.
Each of these projects brought in a few hundred dollars, and their fellow classmates were duly impressed. However, the team that generated the greatest profit looked at the resources at their disposal through a completely different lens, and made $650. These students determined that the most valuable asset they had was neither the five dollars nor the two hours. Instead, their insight was that their most precious resource was their three-minute presentation time in class. They decided to sell it to a company that wanted to recruit students in the class. The team created a three-minute commercial for that company and showed it to the students during their presentation time. This was brilliant! They recognized they had a fabulously valuable assetcreative students who were looking for jobsjust waiting to be mined.