• Complain

Mary Douglas - Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences

Here you can read online Mary Douglas - Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1998, publisher: University of California Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of California Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1998
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Western cultural consensus based on the ideas of free markets and individualism has led many social scientists to consider poverty as a personal experience, a deprivation of material things, and a failure of just distribution. Mary Douglas and Steven Ney find this dominant tradition of social thought about poverty and well-being to be full of contradictions. They argue that the root cause is the impoverished idea of the human person inherited through two centuries of intellectual history, and that two principles, the idea of the solipsist self and the idea of objectivity, cause most of the contradictions.Douglas and Ney state that Economic Man, from its semitechnical niche in eighteenth-century economic theory, has taken over the realms of psychology, consumption, public assistance, political science, and philosophy. They say that by distorting the statistical data presented for policy analysis, the ideas of the solipsist self and objectivity indeed often protect a political bias. The authors propose to correct this by revising the current model of the person. Taking cultural bias into account and giving full play to political dissent, they restore the persons who have been missing from the social science debates.Drawing from anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology, the authors set forth a fundamental critique of the social sciences. Their book will find a wide audience among social scientists and will also interest anyone engaged in current discussions of poverty.This book is a copublication with the Russell Sage Foundation.

Mary Douglas: author's other books


Who wrote Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
title Missing Persons A Critique of the Social Sciences Aaron Wildavsky - photo 1

title:Missing Persons : A Critique of the Social Sciences Aaron Wildavsky Forum for Public Policy ; 1
author:Douglas, Mary.; Ney, Steven.
publisher:University of California Press
isbn10 | asin:0520207521
print isbn13:9780520207523
ebook isbn13:9780585047607
language:English
subjectPoverty--History, Poor, Social sciences--Philosophy, Welfare economics.
publication date:1998
lcc:HC79.P6D677 1998eb
ddc:362.5
subject:Poverty--History, Poor, Social sciences--Philosophy, Welfare economics.
Page i
Missing Persons
Page ii
The Aaron Wildavsky Forum for Public Policy
Edited by Lee Friedman
This series is to sustain the intellectual excitement that Aaron Wildavsky created for scholars of public policy everywhere. The ideas in each volume are initially presented and discussed at a public lecture and forum held at the University of California.
Aaron Wildavsky, 19301993
"Your prolific pen has brought real politics to the study of budgeting, to the analysis of myriad public policies, and to the discovery of the values underlying the political cultures by which peoples live. You have improved every institution with which you have been associated, notably Berkeley's Graduate School of Public Policy, which as Founding Dean you quickened with your restless innovative energy. Advocate of freedom, mentor to policy analysts everywhere."
(Yale University, May 1993, from text granting the honorary degree of Doctor of Social Science)
I. Missing Persons: A Critique of the Social Sciences, by Mary Douglas and Steven Ney
Page iii
Missing Persons
A Critique of the Social Sciences
Mary Douglas and Steven Ney
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
Berkeley Los Angeles London
RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION
New York
Page iv
University of California Press
Berkeley and Los Angeles, California
University of California Press, Ltd.
London, England
1998 by
The Regents of the University of California
These figures and tables were previously published: fig. IGeorge du Maurier, Punch 79 (Oct. 30), 1880, p. 194; figs. 4 and 7Christian Brunner, in Serge Prtre, Nuclaire symbolisme et socit: Contagion mentale ou conscience des risques?, SFEN, Paris, 1989, pp. 89, 13; fig. 6Karl Dake, "The Meanings of Sustainable Development: Household Strategies for Managing Needs and Resources," in Scott D. Wright, ed., Human Ecology: Crossing Boundaries, Society for Human Ecology, Fort Collins, Colo., 1993, p. 431; table 2Drewnowski and Scott 1996 (cited in R. Erikson, The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y., 1987, pp. 18081); table 3Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme, 1991, pp. 2425; table 4Robert Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, 1993, p. 31.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Douglas, Mary.
Missing persons : a critique of the social sciences / Mary
Douglas and Steven Ney.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographic references and index.
ISBN 0-520-20752-1 (alk. paper)
1. PovertyHistory. 2. Poor. 3. Social sciences
Philosophy. 4. Welfare economics.
I. Ney, Steven. II. Title.
HC79.P6D677 1998
362.5dc21Picture 2Picture 3Picture 498-12747
Printed in the United States of America
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standards for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
Page v
Dedicated to the Memory of Aaron Wildavsky
Page vii
The Aaron Wildavsky Distinguished Lectures in Public Policy
It is with great pleasure that we inaugurate this series in honor of Aaron Wildavsky (19301993). Aaron was one of the giants of twentieth-century political science. As the Founding Dean of the Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, he was present at the creation of, and contributed vitally to, the inchoate field of public policy. His written works reflected his enormous range of interests, and included seminal contributions to the study of budgeting, policy analysis, the presidency, and political culture and risk management. Aaron's collegiality and organizational talents matched his prolific pen. He fostered a lively intellectual community wherever he went, whether spending years shaping a new school, or chairing a department, or delivering a host of guest lectures. He reached across disciplinary boundaries, for the appreciated that no single discipline has a monopoly on insights important for improving public policy.
Page viii
With this lecture series, we seek to honor Aaron's many and vital contributions. We hope that the series will be a means of continuing the intellectual excitement that Aaron brought to so many. The series will involve scholars from diverse disciplines and perspectives, invited by the University of California Wildavsky Forum Committee, who have the common interest of wanting to bring social science to bear on public policy issues.
As series editor, it is my pleasure to thank all the individuals and institutions who have helped to launch this series. I am grateful to the many friends, colleagues, and former students of Aaron, to the Russell Sage Foundation, the Hewlett Foundation, and others for the generous financial support that has helped create the Wildavsky Forum for Public Policy. I am grateful, as well, to James H. Clark and Eric Wanner for their support and assistance in arranging for the publication of this series jointly by the University of California Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences»

Look at similar books to Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences»

Discussion, reviews of the book Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.