• Complain

Connett Paul - The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There

Here you can read online Connett Paul - The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: United States, year: 2010;2014, publisher: Chelsea Green Publishing Company, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Carefully lays out the arguments against fluoridation and reasons why it should be discontinued. The authors examine the evidence on fluoridation and conclude convincingly that it should now be considered harmful and ineffective.
- Dr. Hardy Limeback, Professor and Head of Preventative Dentistry, University of Toronto
Sweden rejected fluoridation in the 1970s and, in this excellent book, these three scientists have confirmed the wisdom of that decision.
- Arvid Carlsson, Nobel Laureate in Medicine/Physiology (2000) and Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology, University of Gothenburg
Painstakingly researched expos of fluoridations overall ineffectiveness and toxicity... hundreds of peer-reviewed studies and sound scientific reasoning presented... the case against fluorides alleged safety, even in small doses, is more alarming, with multiple studies showing fluorides probable complicity in lowered intelligence scores, thyroid dysfunction, hip fractures, and the ominously rising incidence of osteosarcoma in boys. The authors academic, hyperbole-free writing style serves them well in marshaling a series of facts that, all by themselves, expose fluoridation as a false panacea.
- Booklist
I highly recommend getting a copy of Dr. Connetts new book,The Case Against Fluoride. - Dr. Joseph Mercola
When the U.S. Public Health Service endorsed water fluoridation in 1950, there was little evidence of its safety. Now, six decades later and after most countries have rejected the practice, many cities and towns across the United States continue to fluoridate their water supply and the Center for Disease Control and the American Dental Association continue to endorse it, despite increasing evidence that it is not only unnecessary, but potentially hazardous to human health.
In this timely and important book, Dr. Paul Connett takes a new look at the science behind water fluoridation and argues that just because the medical establishment endorses a public health measure, that doesnt mean its safe. In the case of water fluoridation, the chemicals used to fluoridate the water that more than 180 million people drink each day are not pharmaceutical grade, but rather hazardous waste products of the phosphate fertilizer industry; it is illegal to dump them into rivers and lakes or release them into the atmosphere. And water fluoridation is a prime example of one of the worst medical practices possible-forced medication with no control over the dose or who gets it. Perhaps most shocking of all, it is not subject to any federal regulation.
At once painstakingly-documented and also highly-readable,The Case Against Fluoridebrings new research to light, including links between fluoride and harm to the brain, bones, and kidneys, and argues that while there is possible value in topical applications like brushing your teeth with fluoride toothpaste, the evidence that swallowing fluoride reduces tooth decay is surprisingly weak.
The Case Against Fluoridedoesnt question the good intentions of dentists who support fluoridation, but rather explores the poor science, bizarre tactics, biased reviews, and puzzling motivations of a relatively small number of influential people who continue to push this practice on a largely ill-informed public.

Connett Paul: author's other books


Who wrote The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

ADVANCE PRAISE FOR The Case Against Fluoride For anyone who has ever - photo 1

ADVANCE PRAISE FOR

The Case Against Fluoride

For anyone who has ever wondered why cities add fluoride to waterand questioned whether they should. Written with clear and easy-to-read prose, and supporting citations, The Case Against Fluoride carefully lays out the arguments against fluoridation and reasons why it should be discontinued. The authors examine the evidence on fluoridation and conclude convincingly that it should now be considered harmful and ineffective.

DR. HARDY LIMEBACK, Professor and Head of
Preventive Dentistry, University of Toronto

Sweden rejected fluoridation in the 1970s, and in this excellent book these three scientists have confirmed the wisdom of that decision. Our children have not suffered greater tooth decay, as World Health Organization figures attest, and in turn our citizens have not borne the other hazards fluoride may cause. In any case, since fluoride is readily available in toothpaste, you dont have to force it on people.

ARVID CARLSSON, Nobel Laureate in Medicine
or Physiology (2000) and Emeritus Professor of
Pharmacology, University of Gothenburg

This book clearly shows that water fluoridation is poor public policy and must end. As a concerned citizen, I applaud the authors for bringing this issue to the worlds attention.

ED ASNER

Alfred North Whitehead said the scientific method means leaving options open for revision. An ancient Roman adage says that whatever touches all must be approved by all. These characterizations of science and democracy are the reasons for reading this book. Especially if you and your family are drinking administratively mandated fluoridated water.

RALPH NADER

THE CASE AGAINST

Fluoride

The Case Against Fluoride How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There - image 2

How Hazardous Waste
Ended Up in Our Drinking Water
and the Bad Science and
Powerful Politics
That Keep It There

PAUL CONNETT, PhD
JAMES BECK, MD, PhD | H. S. MICKLEM, DPhil

Foreword by
Albert W. Burgstahler, PhD

CHELSEA GREEN PUBLISHING
WHITE RIVER JUNCTION, VERMONT

Copyright 2010 by Paul Connett
All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be transmitted or
reproduced in any form by any means without
permission in
writing from the publisher.

Project Manager: Patricia Stone
Developmental Editor: Jill Mason
Copy Editor: Jill Mason
Proofreader: Nancy Ringer
Designer: Peter Holm, Sterling Hill Productions

Printed in the United States of America
First printing September, 2010
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 11 12 13 14

Our Commitment to Green Publishing
Chelsea Green sees publishing as a tool for cultural change and ecological stewardship. We strive to align our book manufacturing practices with our editorial mission and to reduce the impact of our business enterprise in the environment. We print our books and catalogs on chlorine-free recycled paper, using vegetable-based inks whenever possible. This book may cost slightly more because we use recycled paper, and we hope youll agree that its worth it. Chelsea Green is a member of the Green Press Initiative (www.greenpressinitiative.org), a nonprofit coalition of publishers, manufacturers, and authors working to protect the worlds endangered forests and conserve natural resources.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Connett, P. H. (Paul H. )

The case against fluoride : how hazardous waste ended up in our drinking water and the bad science and powerful politics that keep it there / Paul Connett, James Beck, H. Spedding Micklem.

p. ; cm.

eBook ISBN: 978-1-60358-313-8

1. Water--Fluoridation--Health aspects--United States. 2.

Water--Fluoridation--United States--History. 3. Fluorides--Toxicology. I.

Beck, James S. II. Micklem, H. S. III. Title.

[DNLM: 1. Fluoridation--adverse effects--United States. 2.

Fluorides--adverse effects--United States. 3. Health Policy--United States.

4. Water--adverse effects--United States. WU 270 C752c 2010]

RA591. 7. C67 2010
363. 7394--dc22

2010024925

Chelsea Green Publishing Company
Post Office Box 428
White River Junction, VT 05001
(802) 295-6300
www.chelseagreen.com

CONTENTS

In an age of increased awareness of the hidden, often insidious, hazards of many environmental pollutants, it is tragically ironic that fluorideone of industrys most widely dispersed and persistent effluentsis inadequately assessed and poorly understood.

No doubt one of the main reasons why the toxicity of the continual exposure to comparatively low levels of fluoride is not better known is because of the generally favorable image that still surrounds the fluoridation of drinking water. Even though much contradictory evidence exists, dental and public officials persist in promoting and upholding the procedure because they evidently continue to believe it is medically safe for all people.

Fluoridation is motivated by the well-intentioned desire for better teeth and less tooth decay, but even that result is questionable or, at best, marginal. A laudable dental goal has been allowed to outweigh the extensive, well-verified medical evidence collected in this book....

The above words are from the description of a book, Fluoridation: The Great Dilemma , I coauthored in 1978. That text, and the personal context behind its writing, informs the historical significance of this current text by professors Paul Connett, James Beck, and Spedding Micklem (with important support from Peter Meiers on the historical details) and deserve a quick reflection.

While working at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, KS, starting in the mid-1950s, I developed a low-thyroid condition that was not relieved by taking thyroid extracts. In 1964, I became aware of clinical reports of verified illness from fluoridated water by the distinguished Michigan allergist George L. Waldbott, MD (18981982), appearing mostly in specialized foreign journals. From these reports I learned that fluoride in drinking water at the recommended level of 1 part per million (or 1 mg of fluoride per liter of water) could cause a wide variety of reversible toxic effects, including excessive tiredness, aching joints, neuromuscular pains, and other symptoms often associated with hypothyroidism. Knowing that Lawrence had fluoridated water and that I was consuming four or five times the amount mentioned by Waldbott, I switched to distilled water and found that my low-thyroid symptoms quickly began to disappear. My wife, Patricia, who had been experiencing back pain for some years, also found her discomfort was completely relieved after she also changed to distilled water.

With these experiences fresh in mind, I contacted Dr. Waldbott and arranged to visit him, and we soon became close friends. In 1966 he founded the International Society for Fluoride Research and, in 1968, inaugurated its journal, Fluoride Quarterly Reports (now simply Fluoride ). Waldbott started the new journal because major U. S. medical journals, due to unqualified endorsement of fluoridation by the U. S. Public Health Service in 1950, had systematically declined to publish reports of adverse ill effects from fluoridated water.

In 1957, Dr. Waldbott collaborated on a preliminary account of his research on fluoride in The American Fluoridation Experiment (Devin-Adair, 1957; revised 1961). Eight years later he published his monograph A Struggle With TitansForces Behind Fluoridation (Carlton Press, New York, 1965). However, he also wanted to write a more comprehensive book dealing with the ever-growing body of research on adverse health effects of fluoride.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There»

Look at similar books to The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.