• Complain

Tapio Raunio - The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament

Here you can read online Tapio Raunio - The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2019, publisher: Routledge, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Tapio Raunio The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament
  • Book:
    The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Tapio Raunio: author's other books


Who wrote The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
THE EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE
First published 1997 by Ashgate Publishing
Reissued 2018 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright Tapio Raunio 1997
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Publishers Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made every effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact.
A Library of Congress record exists under LC control number: 97019090
ISBN 13: 978-1-138-34234-7 (hbk)
ISBN 13: 978-0-429-43979-7 (ebk)
Figures
Tables
This book is a revised version of my doctoral thesis Party Group Behaviour in the European Parliament. The book is organised as follows.
The first chapter begins with a brief discussion on the role of the European Parliament and Europarties in the governance of the European Union. The literature review presents the state of scholarly research on the internal workings of the Strasbourg Parliament.
The theoretical framework is introduced in . contains the main research question that will be subjected to empirical investigation in later chapters. The final section concludes the chapter with a brief discussion on the balance between endogenous and exogenous preferences.
. the evolution of the EP party system, the institutional imperative of achieving legislative majorities, fractionalisation of the Parliament, and the voting power of the party groups in the 1979-1994 Parliament are investigated.
Voting behaviour analysis of the 1989-94 Parliament is in . the effect of legislative majority requirements on party cohesion and coalition behaviour is examined. The voting behaviour of the party groups on foreign affairs issues is investigated. The final section summarises the results, and ends with a brief discussion on the relevance of the findings to the party structure of the current Parliament.
. examines the level of MEPs questioning activity, and the variation between individual representatives. In the final section (5.10.) the findings are summarised, together with a brief discussion on the role and importance of parliamentary questions.
The first part of the concluding chapter serves as a summary of the arguments and results, with the second and final section analysing the future problems and prospects of Europarties.
Can we democratise international relations? Does transnational, or supranational, democracy work also in practice and not only in the minds of some political scientists? Interested in doing research on the democratisation of state-to-state relations, Professor Olavi Borg suggested to me in 1993 that I did postgraduate studies on the democratisation of the European Union and in particular on the European Parliament. I noticed that while there was an abundance of texts on the Parliament, surprisingly little research had been done on the individual members or the party groups in the Parliament. I thought that my contribution would not reduce the democratic deficit of the Union, but at least I could help reduce the existing deficit in our understanding of the way the Parliament works.
Several individuals deserve recognition for their valuable assistance during the past three years. I am greatly indebted to my two supervisors, Professor Olavi Borg and Associate Professor Matti Wiberg. Olavi Borg has supervised my work with much appreciated professionalism. His active interest in students progress is a delight for persons who need positive and open encouragement. Olavis experience in organisational matters made things much easier for me since I did not have to worry about the technical aspects or about arranging the necessary finances.
Without the help of Matti Wiberg the thesis would still be far from finished. His expertise, frank and insightful criticism, and always constructive comments were crucial factors in helping me to clarify and reconsider my own thoughts. We have discussed this work, among other things, in universities and bars in Turku and elsewhere in Europe. Finally, Matti put much effort into patiently reading various drafts of this work.
I am grateful to both external examiners, Professor Fulvio Attin and Dr David M. Farrell, who read the text carefully and made several suggestions for improvements. Their insightful comments have been duly incorporated into the work. Both have also at an earlier stage read parts of the text and kindly offered their assistance when I needed advice. My sincere thanks to both of them.
Various colleagues have discussed the project with me over the years. I would like to mention in particular David S. Bell, Karl Magnus Johansson, Robert Ladrech and Christopher Lord. The development of my ideas has benefited significantly from these conversations. Most of what is printed between these covers has been presented in numerous international conferences and national seminars. The comments I received during these meetings have substantially helped me in clarifying my arguments. Finally. Virpi Johansson at the Eurooppa-Instituutti in Turku assisted me in compiling the data and in tracing the right documents.
The research was facilitated by scholarships from the University of Tampere as part of the VAKAVA Graduate School programme and from Suomen Kulttuurirahasto.
This book is dedicated to my mother and father. Both have in their own special way contributed to my work. Their love, material support, and experience from academic life has been of immeasurable help throughout the often rather lonely and tiresome process of writing the thesis.
Tapio Raunio
Turku, 30 January 1997
CAP
Common Agricultural Policy
CDI
Technical Group of Co-ordination and Defence of Independent MEPs
CFSP
Common Foreign and Security Policy
COM
Communist and Allies Group
COREPER
Committee of the Permanent Representatives of the
Member States
CSPEC
Confederation of Socialist Parties of the European Community
EB
Eurobarometer
EC
European Community
ECSC
European Coal and Steel Community
ECU
European Currency Unit
EDA
European Democratic Alliance
EDG
European Democratic Group
EE
European elections
EEC
European Economic Community
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament»

Look at similar books to The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament»

Discussion, reviews of the book The European Perspective: Transnational Party Groups in the 1989-94 European Parliament and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.