• Complain

Lars Svendsen - A Philosophy of Lying

Here you can read online Lars Svendsen - A Philosophy of Lying full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. publisher: Reaktion Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Lars Svendsen A Philosophy of Lying

A Philosophy of Lying: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "A Philosophy of Lying" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

From lying to friends to lies in politics, a wide-ranging examination of the forms and ethics of falsehood.From popular philosopher Lars Svendsen, this book is a comprehensive investigation of lying in everyday life. What exactly is a lie, Svendsen asks, and how does lying differ from related phenomena, such as bullshit or being truthful? Svendsen also investigates the ethics of lyingwhy is lying almost always morally wrong, and why is lying to ones friends especially bad? The book concludes by looking at lying in politics, from Platos theory of the noble lie to the Big Lie of Donald Trump.As phrases like fake news and alternative facts permeate our feeds, Svendsens conclusion is perhaps a surprising one: that, even though we all occasionally lie, we are for the most part trustworthy. Trusting others makes one vulnerable, and we will all be duped from time to time. But all things considered, Svendsen contends, truthfulness and vulnerability are preferable to living in a constant state of distrust.

Lars Svendsen: author's other books


Who wrote A Philosophy of Lying? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

A Philosophy of Lying — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "A Philosophy of Lying" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
A Philosophy of Lying - image 1

A PHILOSOPHY OF LYING

A Philosophy of Lying - image 2

A Philosophy of Lying

Lars Svendsen

Translated by

Matt Bagguley

REAKTION BOOKS

Published by Reaktion Books Ltd

Unit 32, Waterside

4448 Wharf Road

London N1 7UX, UK

www.reaktionbooks.co.uk

First published in English 2022

English-language translation Reaktion Books 2022

Matt Bagguley asserts his moral right to be identified as the translator of the work

This book was first published in Norwegian in 2020 by Kagge Forlag AS under the title Lgnens filosofi by Lars H. Fr. Svendsen

Copyright Lars H. Fr. Svendsen 2020

Published in agreement with Oslo Literary Agency

All rights reserved

This translation has been published

with the financial support of NORLA

No part of this publication may be reproduced stored in a retrieval system or - photo 3

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers

Page references in the Index match the printed edition of this book.

Printed and bound in Great Britain by Bell & Bain, Glasgow

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

eISBN 9781789145649

Contents

Introduction

Not that you lied to me,

but that I no longer believe you,

has shaken me.

FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, Beyond Good and Evil

E veryone lies. Everyone condemns lying. We lie even though we agree that lying is wrong. We lie for our own benefit, to appear better or less bad than we are, to get an advantage or to spare ourselves trouble and discomfort. We also lie for someone elses benefit, to spare their feelings or avoid hurting them. Its often hard to tell whether we are lying for someone elses sake or our own we like to tell ourselves that it is for someone elses sake, but even that often involves us lying to ourselves.

I cant remember when I told my first lie, nor what I was lying about. It was probably when I was three or four years old, because thats when we humans start doing that sort of thing, and it was probably to avoid being blamed for doing something wrong. I have never been a very good liar. My father, however, was a formidable liar. They werent malicious lies, just pranks, and my brother and I fell for them almost every damn time. My mother, on the other hand, saw through him most of the time. I almost never managed to fool anyone with a lie. One of the downsides of being the youngest in a family is that everyone else has a psychological advantage over you. That could explain why I never became a skilled liar I was so rarely successful that I lacked the inspiration to continue.

Nevertheless, I didnt quit completely. Since becoming aware of the possibility of lying, I have lied to everyone Ive had a relationship with. I have lied to my parents, brother, wife, girlfriends, children, friends and colleagues. After this admission, however, I feel the sudden need to sugarcoat the pill by saying that on the whole I have been honest with them all. Honesty is not necessarily just an expression of a good character, but is also due to the fact that life is easier when you are honest. A liar has to remember twice as much as someone who is telling the truth both how something really is and how he has said it is. I prefer an uncomplicated life. In this sense, honesty is as much to do with my own convenience as it is about morality. Considering merely ones own convenience, however, is a poor foundation on which to build ones moral life.

Of all the lies I have told, I like to think that most of them have been white, in that I have tried to protect someone directly by being untruthful towards them, or indirectly by telling beneficial lies to someone else about them. However, Ive also told quite a few of the grey or even black variety, where the only consideration I had was for myself where telling the truth would have created more discomfort or problems for me than telling a lie. Hopefully I have mostly avoided the really coal-black lies, where you knowingly and intentionally hurt someone else by telling a lie. My white lies have probably been in the majority. Does that mean that what I have done is okay? Is it morally acceptable to tell white lies? Of course, it is also conceivable that I suffer from such an acute level of self-deception that I am hiding the extent of my dishonesty from myself. But I dont believe that either.

Most people are truthful in general. The majority tell far fewer lies than the average person because there is a minority In the grand scheme of things, lies make up a very small part of everything we say to each other. However, this doesnt mean that lying is not a phenomenon of great importance. One lie, if serious enough, can ruin a marriage, a friendship, a career or a life.

Todays philosophical discussions about lying revolve chiefly around the question of what lies are, about what makes a lie a lie, and what distinguishes it from other related phenomena. These discussions are predominantly found in the philosophy of language. Nevertheless, some findings in this research can be mentioned briefly here. People lie less to each other when they are face to face and more when, for example, they send text messages. Extroverts lie more than introverts, even when we allow for the fact that extroverts interact more socially. Men and women lie more or less equally, but women lie more often to avoid hurting other peoples feelings, while men do it more to highlight their own brilliance. Last but not least, we lie less often to those we have a close relationship with, and we also find lying to them more disturbing.

The first chapter is devoted to a conceptual clarification of what we mean by lying. To achieve this, we will take a closer look at the concepts of truth and truthfulness, and we will also delimit lying from its close relatives, truthiness and bullshit. Lying is understood as choosing to say something you believe to be untrue in a context where the person you are talking to has reason to assume that you are telling the truth. It is important for our further discussion that the most basic terms are given a fairly precise meaning. The next chapter deals with the different views on lying within philosophical ethics, and can be said, roughly, to conclude that lying is nearly always wrong and this applies to so-called white lies too but it also concludes that there are special cases where lying can be defended. After that we turn to certain type of lies, namely the ones we tell ourselves. We humans are notorious self-deceivers, yet we seem to have an obligation to be honest with ourselves. Also, if you are the victim of a comprehensive self-deception, if you are unable to be truthful to yourself, then its unlikely you will manage to be truthful to others. If you cannot trust yourself, no one else can trust you.

Lying is generally wrong, but lying to your friends is especially wrong because you have built a special trusting relationship with them, and that is the topic of the following chapter. Friends have a stronger obligation to be truthful with each other than they do with acquaintances or strangers. It also means you have an obligation to tell your friends uncomfortable truths about themselves. Most reflections on friendship and lying are also valid for relationships with a partner or spouse. If anything, the points in this case are especially applicable since we are most likely talking about an even stronger connection, where a breach of trust in the form of a lie can be experienced as a particularly serious betrayal.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «A Philosophy of Lying»

Look at similar books to A Philosophy of Lying. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «A Philosophy of Lying»

Discussion, reviews of the book A Philosophy of Lying and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.