• Complain

Nicholas Storozynski - Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era

Here you can read online Nicholas Storozynski - Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Nicholas Storozynski, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Nicholas Storozynski Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era
  • Book:
    Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Nicholas Storozynski
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Nicholas Storozynski: author's other books


Who wrote Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
new degree press copyright 2021 Nicholas Dionysius Julius Storozynski All - photo 1
new degree press
copyright 2021 Nicholas Dionysius Julius Storozynski
All rightsreserved.
Manufacturing Progress
In the Post-COVID Era
ISBN
978-1-63676-842-7 Paperback
978-1-63730-200-2 Kindle Ebook
978-1-63730-286-6 Digital Ebook
To Bella. Carry thefire.
Contents


Chapter 1
What Do You Think Are the Three Biggest Problems Facing America Today?
Chapter 2
Same Team
Chapter 3
Strategic Initiatives : Playing the Long Game
Chapter 4
Mauled by Blue Cross
Chapter 5
Welcome to the Jungle
Chapter 6
Conscious of Class
Chapter 7
Gilded Age Merry-Go-Round : The Big, Sexy Econ Chapter
Chapter 8
Split Down the Middle : Demand-Side Jesus
Chapter 9
Whats the Worst That Could Happen?
Chapter 10
Progressives as the Solution
Chapter 11
Do You Want to Win Arguments or Do You Want to Make the World A Better Place?

Za nasz i wasz wolno
For our freedom and yours
Tadeusz Kosciuszko
Authors Note

Theres a growing consensus that something, or everything, in American politics is going wrong.
For those of us who were Obama Democrats, it seems this sand in the gears has just blown in. Sure, things have changed. You could credibly say this change started during the Reagan years, or that things started spiraling out of control with the Newt Gingrich-led impeachment and government shutdown, or that George W. Bush was the true end of Americas heroic world leadership. Ok, finesome might say that things were good until opinion pieces like those by Bill OReilly or Sean Hannity began masquerading as news and ended civility in our national discourse. But definitely, absolutely, the last time things were on the rails was 2016. Promise.
Theres a great case to be made for each, so the one I would point to in casual conversation is usually the last one I was thinking about, in much the same way that my favorite Tarantino movie is whichever one Ive seen most recently (currently The Hateful Eight). No matter which one we discuss, therefore, I would tend to agree.
For those further to the left than Obama-style Democrats, the belief is that this system was designed to run with sand in the gears. America was built on slavery and stolen ground, dragged its feet through Reconstruction, and didnt pass the Civil Rights Act until peaceful protests turned to riots after Dr. Kings assassination, or so the argument goes. Or maybe its the system of capitalism itself, based upon the exploitation of the working class, and expanding across the globe for sweatshops in Asia, wars for oil in the Middle East, and coups in Bolivia to ensure dirt-cheap prices for the rare metals found in Tesla batteries.
Well, when you point out all the atrocities like that, its hard to disagree.
Theres an old saying that Someone who is nice to me, but not to the waiter, isnt a nice person. For those people, America is a diner who insulted the waiter, left no tip, and then followed him out to the parking lot to knock him out and steal the gas money from his wallet.
Debating between one or the other is wasting time from implementing real change. Its possible to admit that some things are built into the system and try to change them and to admit that things have gotten worse at some point in the last forty years. Thinking critically about which things have gotten worse is not only an important question unto itself but will speak to greater themes of injustice baked into the system. You can point to the fact that the War on Drugs targeted people of color, which is bad and then see a greater trend of racial injustice. You can point to the fact that cutting taxes on the wealthy leads to gross income inequality, which is bad, and then see a greater trend of economic injustice.
Lets start by asking ourselves: What exactly is going wrong, and when did this start? What did the world look like before that was the case? For at least forty years following the 1940s, America had low unemployment, lower inequality, a big social safety net, a minimum wage equivalent to $22 an hour in 2020, and a president pushing for all Americans to have access to affordable health care. Hell, there was even a time when a Republican president said that any dollar spent on war and bullets was a dollar that could be used to feed a hungry child. How do we shift the Overton window back in that direction?
(For those who would throw the baby out with the bathwater because America was built on stolen land, there are problems inherent to capitalism:
Im not a priest, but I dont think you can give confession to an abstract notion like a nation.
Im too shy to write a Revolutions for Dummies book but let me know how that goes.)
I started writing this book because I wanted to learn why liberals are so bad at talking about important issues and even worse at winning elections. I was frustrated by the fact that liberals didnt have a big picture strategy capable of beating a reality TV show host and a slew of conspiracy theorists. It then evolved into a reflection on the most important questions facing us as a nation:
What does an America that works for everyone look like?
Writing helped to organize and gather my thoughts. Hopefully, it will make my worldview make sense to someone who doesnt agree with me and change their mind for the better.
The title of this book is a reference to Manufacturing Consent by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky. The main idea of the book is that the media serves in part to make people want things they wouldnt normally want. In the lead-up to the Iraq War, for example, even the New York Times was writing op-eds and phrasing their articles in a way that made the war seem inevitable, which warms people up to the idea of going to war. Normal people didnt really have anything to gain from going to war, but the media helped them to think that something bad was good for them. I want to do the opposite here and use my voice to help people realize they are allowed to demand better treatment. This is my small part to manufacture some progress in the right direction for our country. You pay your taxes, and you are allowed to want a government to work for you.
This book aims to hijack that same mechanism but by manufacturing support for progressive policies. We should be asking if $1,200 a month is enough to help our people or if we need to go to $3,000 a month. We should be demanding the money we use on missiles go to giving Medicare to all of our citizens. We should be holding our elected officials responsible for getting our moneys worth out of our tax dollars. Thats Progress.
So, heres my attempt to talk about where we are as a nation, to stitch together where we can go forward. My audience arent wonks, partly because in-depth policy detail doesnt change minds, but mostly because wonks throw terrible parties. My audience is people who vote, people who might vote but dont, the heroes who talk to the first two groups of individuals, and people who might run for office or guide the conversation in those offices.
For people who vote: I will make a case for why these progressive policies arent as crazy as they seem and will improve your lives. Push your representatives toward these positions.
For people with different beliefs than I have:
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era»

Look at similar books to Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era»

Discussion, reviews of the book Manufacturing Progress: In the Post-Covid Era and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.