• Complain

Elihu Katz - Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications

Here you can read online Elihu Katz - Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, publisher: Routledge, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

First published in 1955, Personal Influence reports the results of a pioneering study conducted in Decatur, Illinois, validating Paul Lazarsfelds serendipitous discovery that messages from the media may be further mediated by informal opinion leaders who intercept, interpret, and diffuse what they see and hear to the personal networks in which they are embedded. This classic volume set the stage for all subsequent studies of the interaction of mass media and interpersonal influence in the making of everyday decisions in public affairs, fashion, movie-going, and consumer behavior. The contextualizing essay in Part One dwells on the surprising relevance of primary groups to the flow of mass communication. Peter Simonson of the University of Pittsburgh has written that Personal Influence was perhaps the most influential book in mass communication research of the postwar era, and it remains a signal text with historic significance and ongoing reverberations...more than any other single work, it solidified what came to be known as the dominant paradigm in the field, which later researchers were compelled either to cast off or build upon. In his introduction to this fiftieth-anniversary edition, Elihu Katz discusses the theory and methodology that underlie the Decatur study and evaluates the legacy of his coauthor and mentor, Paul F. Lazarsfeld.

Elihu Katz: author's other books


Who wrote Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Personal Influence Originally published in 1955 by The Free Press Published - photo 1
Personal
Influence
Originally published in 1955 by The Free Press
Published 2006 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2017 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
New material this edition copyright 2006 by Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2005043945
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Katz, Elihu, 1926
Personal influence : the part played by people in the flow of mass communic
ations / Elihu Katz & Paul F. Lazarsfeld ; with a new introduction by
Elihu Katz and a foreword by Elmer Roper.2nd ed.
p. cm.
T.p. verso: Originally published in 1955 by The Free Press.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-4128-0507-4 (pbk.: alk. paper)
1. Public opinion. 2. Mass media. I. Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix. II. Title.
HM1236.K38 2005
303.3'8dc22
2005043945
ISBN-13: 978-1-4128-0507-0 (pbk)
To Rose and Maurice Katz, lnfluentials
1955
And to Ruth-for more than fifty years
2005
And what is a still greater novelty, the mass
do not now take their opinions from dignitaries
in Church or State, from ostensible leaders, or
from books. Their thinking is done for them
by men much like themselves, addressing them
or speaking in ,their name, on the spur of the
moment...
JOHN STUART Mn.L
On Liberty
CONTENTS
Part One
The Part Played by People:
A New Focus for the Study of Mass Media Effects
The Rediscovery of the Primary Group:
Case Histories of an Intervening Variable
Section Two: Norms and Networks in the Process
of Persuasion: Linking Small Group
Research with Mass Media Research
V. The Role of the Group in Influencing Change:
Implications for Mass Media Research
The Traditional Community: Examples from
International Communications Research
Part Two
The Flow of Everyday Influence
in a Midwestern Community
Life-Cycle Position and Marketing Leadership:
The Large Family Wives
APPENDIX D. On the Construction of Indices:
Including a Substantive Addendum on an
Index of Popular Fiction Consumption
2. Four ndices Discussed: Gregariousness,
Social Status, Importance and Opinion
Leadership (self-designated)
3. A Substantive Addendum: On Gregari
ousness, Anxiety and the Consumption
of Popular Fiction
T HE FIELD STUDY reported in the second part of this volume owes a great deal to a variety of collaborators. We shall not try to rank the importance of their contributions. In some cases it is the amount of attention and energy spent on the collection and analysis of data which deserves thanks. In other cases the contribution consisted of a specific idea or a helpful preliminary draft on a specific topic. We shall list the names of our associates in the sequence in which they worked on the various phases of the study.
The statistical work which led to the selection of the town and the sampling within the town was supervised by Bernard R. Berelson.
The whole organization of field work for the study was in the hands of C. Wright Mills.
The field staff was trained and supervised by Jeanette Green. The first perusal of the material was done by a group of analysts who wrote a series of memoranda on various topics of immediate interest. Especially valuable were the many contributions of Helen Dinerman and Thelma Anderson. Leila A. Sussmann and Patricia L. Kendall contributed early analyses of the marketing and movie materials.
When it came to the drafting of a text for publication, the component sections were entrusted to several associates. It is to these colleagues that our greatest debt is due:
David B. Gleicher
Peter H. Rossi
Leo Srole
Messrs. Srole and Gleicher prepared drafts for the section on the characteristics of opinion leaders and Mr. Rossfs work was primarily in the section on the impact of personal influence.
Through all the varying phases of analysis and writing the advice of C. Wright Mills was extremely valuable, often opening up completely new perspectives on the data.
For reading drafts of the manuscript of sympathetically but critically and contributed clarity, caution and good sense right through to the final proofreading.
The index is the contribution of Alberta Curtis Rattray; the charts are the work of Seymour Howard. The major portion of the typing of the final draft was done by Robert Witt, and the service staff of Columbia Universitys Bureau of Applied Social Research did the difficult job of coding and tabulating with its usual efficiency.
To Everett R. Smith of Macfadden Publications, and Jeremiah Kaplan of The Free Press we owe thanks for a degree of patience considerably in excess of that which one has a right to expect even from sponsors, publishers and friends.
Lazarsfelds Legacy: The Power of Limited Effects
I N THE FAMOUS debate between Emile Durkheim and Gabriel Tarde (Clark, 1969), Durkheim argued that sociology was about the compelling power of social norms, while Tarde, the ostensible loser, gave priority to the study of aggregation, how communication from person to person to person contributes to the formation of these norms. In designing The Decatur Studyon which this book reportsPaul Lazarsfeld sided with Tarde. He admired Tardes (1898) brilliant study of the role of conversation in the aggregation of public opinion. Tardes observation that if no one conversed, the newspapers would appear to no avail...because they would exercise no profound influence on any minds is the classic precursor of Lazarsfelds two-step flow of communication.
The Decatur Study is an empirical validation of Lazarsfelds serendipitous discovery, dating to The Peoples Choice, his 1940 study of voting decisions. He found that messages from the media may be further mediated by informal opinion leaders who intercept, interpret, and diffuse what they see and hear to the personal networks in which they are embedded. Together with the concept of selectivity in exposure, perception, and recall of media messages, the two step hypothesis points to a shift in the balance of power between media and audiences, at least as far as short-run persuasion is concerned. There was talk of limited effects, and anticipation of the active audience. It was implied that media effectiveness was somehow dependent on supplementation by interpersonal influence (Lazarsfeld and Merton, 1948; Katz and Popescu, 2004).
The hypothesis evoked interest. In addition to Decatur, it spawned a number of subsequent studies at Columbia Universitys Bureau of Applied Social Research, notable among which were Robert Mertons (1949) study of how cosmopolitan opinion leaders relayed the content of newsweeklies to their constituents, Bernard Berelson et als (1954) sequel to the 1940 voting study, and Daniel Lerners (1958) effort to identify opinion leaders in the process of modernization. Objections came from irate advocates of powerful effects, such as Gitlin (1978), who argued that the opinion leader idea was mere camouflage for the direct effects of the media, and from researchers such as Lang (1981), Adorno (1969), and McLuhan (1964), who insisted that the power of the media lay in slowing change or in long-run effects and not in short-run campaigns to affect voting or buying behavior.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications»

Look at similar books to Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications»

Discussion, reviews of the book Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.