• Complain

Michaela DeSoucey - Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food

Here you can read online Michaela DeSoucey - Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: Princeton University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Michaela DeSoucey Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food
  • Book:
    Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Princeton University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Who cares about foie gras? As it turns out, many do. In the last decade, this French delicacy--the fattened liver of ducks or geese that have been force-fed through a tube--has been at the center of contentious battles between animal rights activists, artisanal farmers, industry groups, politicians, chefs, and foodies. In Contested Tastes, Michaela DeSoucey takes us to farms, restaurants, protests, and political hearings in both the United States and France to reveal why people care so passionately about foie gras--and why we should care too.

Bringing together fieldwork, interviews, and materials from archives and the media on both sides of the Atlantic, DeSoucey offers a compelling look at the moral arguments and provocative actions of pro- and anti-foie gras forces. She combines personal stories with fair-minded analysis of the social contexts within which foie gras is loved and loathed. From the barns of rural southwest France and the headquarters of the European Union in Brussels, to exclusive New York City kitchens and the government offices of Chicago, DeSoucey demonstrates that the debates over foie gras involve heated and controversial politics. Her rich and nuanced account draws our attention to the cultural dynamics of markets, the multivocal nature of gastropolitics, and the complexities of what it means to identify as a moral eater in todays food world.

Investigating the causes and consequences of the foie gras wars, Contested Tastes illuminates the social significance of food and taste in the twenty-first century.

Michaela DeSoucey: author's other books


Who wrote Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

CONTESTED
TASTES

Contested Tastes Foie Gras and the Politics of Food - image 1

PRINCETON STUDIES IN CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY

Paul J. DiMaggio, Michle Lamont, Robert J. Wuthnow, and Viviana A. Zelizer,
Series Editors

A list of titles in this series appears at the back of the book.

CONTESTED
TASTES

FOIE GRAS

and the

POLITICS OF FOOD

MICHAELA DESOUCEY

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

PRINCETON AND OXFORD

Copyright 2016 by Princeton University Press

Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540

In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW

press.princeton.edu

Jacket images courtesy of Shutterstock

All Rights Reserved

ISBN 978-0-691-15493-0

Library of Congress Control Number: 2015956952

British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available

This book has been composed in Adobe Caslon Pro and Berthold Akzidenz Grotesk

Printed on acid-free paper.

Printed in the United States of America

1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I have many people to thank for their contributions to this book, and none deserve more credit than those who participated in my research in both France and the United States. A thousand thanks to the chefs, activists, farmers, politicians, journalists, and others who let me into their worlds and shared their knowledge, stories, and perspectives. While each might find some place to object to my analysis, I hope that the picture I have painted of the past decades fights over foie gras is seen as a fair one and that my respect for all the players involved is clear.

Northwestern Universitys Department of Sociology was where this project was born and took shape, and where I began to grow as a sociologist. Gary Alan Fine has inspired and pushed my analytic abilities to new levels. His dedication and work ethic continue to be inspirational, if inimitable. I am also grateful to Wendy Griswold, Bruce Carruthers, Nicola Beisel, and Laura Beth Nielsen for constructive criticism and encouragement through the dissertation process and since. The late Allan Schnaiberg deserves a heartfelt thank-you for teaching me to be a compassionate and engaged scholar and educator. The Culture Workshop, the Ethnography Workshop, the Management and Organizations Department, and the Center for Legal Studies were all intellectual homes at Northwestern that merit particular acknowledgment.

Fellow graduate students at Northwestern created an exciting intellectual environment and have continued to provide the camaraderie needed to get through a process like this. Gratitude is due to Heather Schoenfeld, Gabrielle Ferrales, Lynn Gazley, Corey Fields, Kerry Dobransky, Erin McDonnell, Terry McDonnell, Jo-Ellen Pozner, Elisabeth Anderson, Berit Vannebo, Geoff Harkness, Ashlee Humphreys, Michelle Naffziger, Simona Giorgi, Marina Zaloznaya, Sara Soderstrom, and Nicole Van Cleve. Special thanks to Ellen Berrey, who has been a superb book-buddy these last few years and helped guide this project to completion. Elise Lipkowitz also deserves a particular note of my sincere appreciation and indebtedness here. Elise has been a travel partner, dining companion, sounding board, reader, copyeditor, analyst, and pillar of moral support. I could not have written this book without her.

In the two great years I spent as a postdoc at Princeton University in the Department of Sociology and the Center for the Study of Social Organization, this project benefited from the mentorship and advice of numerous scholars. Paul DiMaggios interest in and encouragement of my work has been ongoing. Conversations with Viviana Zelizer, Martin Ruef, Bob Wuthnow, Kim Scheppele, Mitch Duneier, Miguel Centeno, Amin Ghaziani, and Sophie Meunier shaped this project in a host of positive ways. I lucked out in sharing an office with Sarah Thbaud and Adam Slez, who read and commented on proposals, memos, and early chapter drafts, as well as became great friends. I also benefited from insights and support from Miranda Waggoner, Liz Chiarello, and my writing group of Janet Vertesi, Grace Yukich, Kathryn Gin Lum, Manu Radhakrishnan, and Annie Blazer. Sarah and Miranda, especially, have been ongoing sounding boards after we each went our separate ways.

I wrote the final version of this manuscript at North Carolina State University, where smart and wonderful colleagues have offered fresh perspectives that allowed me to see beyond the boundaries of my initial work. Special thanks are due to Michael Schwalbe and Sarah Bowen for helping me, with their constructively critical eyes, to revise the final manuscript after receiving my reviewer comments.

A number of other friends and colleagues have also given me invaluable advice and feedback along the way. Writing is a truly collaborative enterprise. This book is better because of what I have learned from (in no particular order): Kim Ebert, Sinikka Elliott, Jeff Leiter, Tom Shriver, David Schleifer, Liz Cherry, Colter Ellis, Isabelle Tchoueyres, Rich Ocejo, Brendan Nyhan, Lauren Rivera, Christopher Bail, David Meyer, Daphne Demetry, Jordan Colosi, Alice Julier, Krishnendu Ray, Rachel Laudan, Anne McBride, Christy Shields-Argles, Robin Wagner-Pacifici, Andy Perrin, Jose Johnston, Joslyn Brenton, Diana Mincyte, Rhys Williams, Ken Albala, Warren Belasco, Cathy Kaufman, Robin Dodsworth, Kate Keleman, Klaus Weber, Kate Heinze, Paul Hirsch, Brayden King, and many others. I hope the final result is a tribute to their work on my behalf.

Some of the research for this book would have not happened without Mark Caro. Mark and I met at a food conference in 2007 and, as perhaps the two most foie-obsessed writers in Chicago, quickly realized we would benefit by working together. He was a delightful research partner, both in Chicago and France, and his research for his own book (The Foie Gras Wars) was enormously useful to me. He is also great at pushing stuck Volvos out of country-road ditches.

I could not have found a better home for this book than with Princeton University Press. I am lucky to have had not one, but two excellent editors there. Eric Schwartz saw the books potential and guided me through the process of constructing the first draft, and became a friend as well as an editor during the process. Eric secured two incredible reviewers for the manuscript, both of whom read carefully and thoughtfully, and my book is better for their detailed comments and inquiries. When he left the Press, I was apprehensive, but Meagan Levinson quickly took away any fears. She is the editor that first-time authors dream about, for her intelligence and good humor, her sharp insights, the time she has spent with my manuscript, and her genuine ability to see both details and the big picture at the same time. Ryan Mulligan has similarly been a pleasure to work with. I am also the beneficiary of wonderful production management by Ellen Foos, copyediting by Katherine Harper, and indexing by Jan Williams.

Heartfelt and loving thanks are also due to the family and close friends who supported me through this long project. First are my mom and dadCarolyn and Bob DeSouceyand my brother, David, and sister, Arielle. My late grandparents, Milton and Matilda Block, provided inspiration and made things possible. Anya Freiman Goldey and Valerie Lisner Smith have long been like my sisters; I am grateful for their true friendship, and I consider their families my own. I also thank Abby and Bob Millhauser for welcoming me into their family, and for clipping articles and taking photos of menus on their travels to add to my collection. My adopted family at Kinnikinnick FarmDavid and Susan Cleverdon, Erin and Kevin Grace, and Staci and Tim Oienhas long provided me a special, nourishing, and safe haven.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food»

Look at similar books to Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food»

Discussion, reviews of the book Contested Tastes: Foie Gras and the Politics of Food and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.