Cover
title | : | Informality : Social Theory and Contemporary Practice International Library of Sociology |
author | : | Misztal, Barbara A. |
publisher | : | Taylor & Francis Routledge |
isbn10 | asin | : | 0415156742 |
print isbn13 | : | 9780415156745 |
ebook isbn13 | : | 9780203003626 |
language | : | English |
subject | Social interaction. |
publication date | : | 2000 |
lcc | : | HM1111.M57 2000eb |
ddc | : | 302 |
subject | : | Social interaction. |
Page i
Informality
For most of the twentieth century, modernity has been characterised by the formalisation of social relations as face to face interactions are replaced by impersonal bureaucracy and finance. As we enter the new millennium, however, it becomes increasingly clear that it is only by stepping outside these formal structures that trust and cooperation can be created and social change achieved. In a brilliant theoretical tour de force, illustrated with sustained case studies of changing societies in the former eastern Europe and of changing forms of interaction within so-called virtual communities, Barbara Misztal argues that only the society that achieves an appropriate balance between the informality and formality of interaction will find itself in a position to move forward to further democratisation and an improved quality of life.
Barbara A.Misztal is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Arts at Griffith University, Brisbane. She is the author of Trust in Modern Society, Polity, 1996.
Page ii
International Library of Sociology
Founded by Karl Mannheim
Editor: John Urry
University of Lancaster
Page iii
Informality
Social theory and contemporary practice
Barbara A.Misztal
London and New York
Page iv
First published 2000
by Routledge
11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE
Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada
by Routledge
29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group
This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002.
2000 Barbara A.Misztal
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or
reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical,
or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Misztal, Barbara A.
Informality: social theory and contemporary practice/
Barbara A.Misztal
p. cm.(International library of sociology)
Includes bibliographical references (p. )
1. Social interaction. I. Title. II. Series.
HM1111.M57 1999
302dc21 9916271
CIP
ISBN 0-203-00362-4 Master e-book ISBN
ISBN 0-203-27609-4 (OEB Format)
ISBN 0-415-15673-4 (hbk)
ISBN 0-415-15674-2 (pbk)
Page v
For David, who knows we need formality
Page vi
This page intentionally left blank.
Page vii
Contents
Introduction: What use is the concept of informality? | |
PART I Informality and its assets |
| Defining informality | |
| The growing formlessness and unpredictability of social life | |
| Informality and styles of interaction | |
PART II Revealing the significance of informality |
| Explaining cooperation | |
| Making music together | |
| The dynamics of innovation | |
PART III Informality in the changing world |
| Technology and informality | |
| Political change and informality | |
Conclusion: Informality and democracy | |
Bibliography | |
Index | |
Page viii
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 1
Introduction: What use is the concept of informality?
In all differentiated societies, as in many simpler ones, there are categories of social situation in which the social code demands from members raised in the society that they behave in formal waysor, to use a noun, it demands formality of behaviour; and there are other categories of social situation where, according to the code, informal behaviour,that is, a more or less high degree of informality is appropriate (Elias 1996:28). |
WHY ARE MANAGERS STILL TRAVELLING?
Despite modern communications technologies (teleconferencing, video-conferencing, faxes, electronic mail, telephones, etc), senior managers still spend the majority of their time in face-to-face encounters (Rice 1991). In order to meet their business partners, bosses of the biggest corporate giants travel up to five days a week (The Economist, 16 December, 1995:16). So, why are they travelling? The answer to this question will illustrate why people, despite the fact that the essence of modern social life is the replacement of informal obligations and interaction by impersonal and formal rules, still value informality.
Generally, it can be said that managers do travel because they value face-to-face contacts as having the potential to draw individuals deeper into relationships with one another and thereby offer a fuller sense of individual recognition and trust.
Managers well-documented preference for face-to-face communication (Minzberg 1973; Kurke and Aldrich 1983; McKenney, Zack and Doherty 1992; Nohria and Eccles 1992) is based on their belief that co-present communication can reduce the risk of uncooperative behaviour due to its capacity to build an understanding and to enact solutions to disputable problems (McKenney, Zack and Doherty 1992). Managers forsake the convenience of e-mail for the discomfort of air travel because they presume that nothing succeeds in creating trust better than eyeball to eyeball contact (The Economist, 16 December, 1995:16). Modern organizations and their managers operate under the new conditions of the growing division of labour, the
Next page