Table of Contents
For E
Copyright Ulrich Beck 2007. First published in German as Weltrisikogesellschaft Suhrkamp, 2007.
This English edition Polity Press, 2009.
Polity Press
65 Bridge Street
Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK
Polity Press
350 Main Street
Malden, MA 02148, USA
The translation of this work was supported by a grant from the Goethe-Institut that is funded by the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4200-0
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-4201-7(pb)
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-8162-7(epub)
ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-8161-0(mobi)
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: www.polity.co.uk
Acknowledgements
Risk Society was published in German in 1986. In 1999, World Risk Society appeared in English and was translated into more than ten languages, though not into German. The attempt to translate it into German in a lightly revised version proved to be untenable. Too much has occurred in the meantime, the learning curve in responding to global risks is simply too vast. Hence this new book.
There was no shortage of reasons for writing it. They reside, first, in the endless chain of events in which reality and the mass media are co-authoring ever new chapters of world risk society. What seemed larger than life twenty years ago has proved to be the script that reality has been following: We are all trapped in the global danger zone (Tagesanzeiger, Zurich, 2006). On the other hand, the trend towards a globalization of risks is also reflected in the reception of Risk Society. My analyses have by now been translated into more than thirty languages and have triggered heated debates across nations and specialist fields in sociology and political science, in law and history, in philosophy, anthropology, ecology and engineering. Furthermore, studies on diverse topics in the most varied empirical contexts have contributed to articulating the contours, paradoxes and contradictions of (world) risk society. This worldwide discourse on Risk Society stimulated me to further reflection and to write World at Risk. I would like to mention here just the inspiring works of Joost van Loon (Risk and Technological Culture: Towards a Sociology of Virulence) and Piet Strydom (Risk, Environment and Society: Ongoing Debates, Current Issues and Future Prospects).
Earlier versions of one or more of the chapters presented here were commented upon by Jakob Arnoldi, Boris Holzer, Edgar Grande, Christoph Lau, Daniel Levy, Stefan May, Martin Muslow, Angelika Poferl and Natan Sznaider, to whom I am also sincerely grateful. The context for this book was provided by cooperation and discussion within the Collaborative Research Centre Reflexive Modernization, which enjoys the generous support of the German Research Foundation. Without Raimund Fellinger, friend and editor, this book would never have been written. I would also like to thank Almut Kleine and Waltraud Zoldos for their work in typing the manuscript.
On this occasion, Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim encouraged me to tame my academicism and to indulge my pleasure in writing. Hence this book is addressed not to sociologists alone but to all of those who are keen to understand our age of man-made uncertainties.
Introduction: Staging Global Risk
The academic debate concerning climate change is over, but the political and moral responses have reached a new level. Human beings, as researchers have established with a unanimity rare with such multi-faceted issues, bear the primary blame for global warming. The real novelty, perhaps even the historic message of this report, is the conclusiveness with which all evasions and doubts concerning the human causation of climate change are dispelled.
Mller-Jung 2007 (referring to IPCC 2007)
The anticipation of catastrophe is changing the world
A suicide bomber attack in which terrorists with British passports planned to blow up several passenger aircraft en route from Heathrow to the United States with liquid explosives did not occur during the summer of 2006 under the spotlight of the global mass media because the British police, in cooperation with international colleagues, managed to intervene on time and arrest the suspected perpetrators. On 6 November, barely three months after the thwarted attack, a new EU-wide regulation came into force that imposes severe restrictions on the transport of liquids in aircraft cabins. The new security measures are the worldwide reaction to anticipated terrorist attacks which, as stated, did not occur in a certain place, i.e. London. They place restrictions on the freedom of millions of passengers for the foreseeable future. The passengers, in whose minds the terrorist threat has become lodged, accepted such restrictions on their liberties without demur.
The power of the powerless or: The risk to the reputation of banks
The pressure exerted by a small Westphalian environmental group is jeopardizing a multibillion dollar nuclear generation project in Bulgaria. Following protests by this internationally networked civic group opposed to nuclear power, Deutsche Bank and the HypoVereinsbank withdrew their financing of the Belene nuclear power station. The justification offered was the high reputation risk that forced the banks on to the defensive. Allegedly this had nothing to do with the evaluation of the project, even from an environmental point of view. The measure was solely due to the protests of the group Urgewalt, Ausgestrahlt and its European partners. The anticipated nuclear threat which might be posed by the planned Bulgarian nuclear power plant in the future was publicly denounced by a small West German group active across Europe in protest actions picked up by the media for example, outside the Deutsche Bank with the result that the silent powerbrokers of global capitalism, the banks, gave in without a murmur.
Segregating risk embryos
The successes of human genetics and reproductive medicine mean that parents can now select embryos whose genetic profiles promise a reduced risk of illness. They are taking advantage of the opportunities provided by reproductive medicine to weed out embryos with predispositions, for instance, for cancer which will not break out in later life with certainty but only with a certain degree of probability and to bring potentially healthy children into the world. All couples, whether they like it or not, will be confronted with this difficult decision sooner or later. They will have to assess whether their wish to prevent suffering, even though they cannot be certain that it will occur, justifies the conscious selection of an embryo and the rejection of potential children who are bearers of a risk gene, however the latter is identified. This can lead simultaneously to a lowering of inhibitions. The growing interest in the early detection and elimination of the risk of cancer through genetic screening is symptomatic of a growing tolerance for genetic selection. It is also contributing to the use of pre-implantation diagnosis to identify indicators that are less concerned with serious illnesses and ultimately even give effect to preferences and prejudices. And although there are in the meantime thousands of apparently healthy babies in the United States who underwent these interventions at the pre-embryonic stage, concerns over their unknown long-term effects cannot be simply brushed aside.
Next page