• Complain

James Morcan - Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?

Here you can read online James Morcan - Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed? full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2019, publisher: Sterling Gate Books, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

An unbiased, neutral, fact-based investigation that simply allows the science to do the talking on childhood vaccinations. Written by father and son investigative journalism/research team Lance & James Morcan, with a foreword by medical laboratory scientist Elsabet Norris, VACCINE SCIENCE REVISITED is possibly the most well-referenced work yet to explore this contentious healthcare subject.
This exhaustively-researched book avoids all rumor, conjecture and anecdotal evidence, and steadfastly focuses on what the latest medical studies actually reveal about vaccines listed on the immunization schedule. One by one the ingredients of the vaccines being manufactured today are put under the microscope by comparing peer-reviewed, published studies.
By collaborating with a professional medical advisory team and utilizing investigative journalism methods, the Morcans have painstakingly sifted through the worlds best scientific research papers. They analyze the most reliable and untainted studies in order to uncover true and accurate data on vaccine safety.
No matter your level of education or experience whether you are a doctor, layman, scientist, nurse, med student or new parent be prepared to be surprised by many of the medical research findings in VACCINE SCIENCE REVISITED: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?

James Morcan: author's other books


Who wrote Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed? — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
VACCINE SCIENCE REVISITED:Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?

THE UNDERGROUND KNOWLEDGE SERIES

James & Lance

MORCAN

VACCINE SCIENCE REVISITED: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?

Published by:

Sterling Gate Books

28 St. Heliers Place,

Papamoa 3118,

Bay of Plenty,

New Zealand

sterlinggatebooks@gmail.com

Copyright James Morcan & Lance Morcan 2019

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.

Although the authors and publisher have made every effort to ensure that the information in this book was correct at press time, the authors and publisher do not assume and hereby disclaim any liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident, or any other cause.

Should you the reader identify any content within this book that is harmful, hurtful, sensitive or insensitive, the authors and publisher ask that you contact them so they may rectify any problem.

Medical disclaimer: The information contained herein reflects only the opinion of the authors. It is not to be construed as medical care or medical advice and is not a replacement for medical care given by physicians or trained medical personnel. Specific medical advice should be obtained from a licensed health care practitioner.

National Library of New Zealand publication data:

Morcan, James 1978

Morcan, Lance 1948

Title: VACCINE SCIENCE REVISITED: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?

Edition: First ed.

Format: Ebook

Publisher: Sterling Gate Books

ISBN: 978-0-473-46775-3

CONTENTSI think of the need for more wisdom in the world, to deal with the knowledge that we have. At one time we had wisdom, but little knowledge. Now we have a great deal of knowledge, but do we have enough wisdom to deal with that knowledge? Jonas Salk
Acknowledgements

Elsabet (Lisa) Norris, Medical Laboratory Scientist: For carefully reading this manuscript at various stages over the years and seeing potential in our early, raw drafts. For patiently advising us on how to improve it again and again. And also for sharing insider tales of what goes on in medical labs and public healthcare facilities. We cannot thank you enough, Lisa!

Dr. Stephen Martino, M.D.: For sharing details about the field of neurology and also offering personal insights as a father who oversaw and observed vaccination of his own children.

Denis Toovey, Clinical Pharmacist and author of Better Health for You : For collaborating with us on our previous medical non-fiction book, which helped prepare us to put together the pieces of this healthcare jigsaw.

Dr. Kevin Coleman: For alerting us to anomalies in vaccine research and answering numerous scientific questions over the years. Also for sharing personal experiences of administering vaccines on various continents during his professional medical career.

Sigrur . Einarsdttir, Registered Nurse: For reading the manuscript and giving honest feedback.

Leticia Martinez: For encouragement and being a positive force.

Tammi Stefano: For setting an example of how to be courageous and stand up for the truth.

Lastly, wed like to thank the more than 10,000 members of Underground Knowledge , the global discussion group we founded on Goodreads. Especially the doctors, scientists, nurses and parents who bravely shared their opinions about vaccines in a public forum.

Foreword

B ack when I was a student in the laboratory science program at Weber State University, Utah, I developed a fascination for microbial life. Vaccine science was a part of the curriculum, but the emphasis, ahead of all else, was on the greatness of the invention of vaccines and their revolutionary ability to ward off sickness. Vaccines were then, and still are, considered a lifesaving technology. Said to be so crucial to our health that every child should receive the official immunization schedule, which in some countries is now mandatory by law.

During my student days, there was never any opportunity for discussion relating to potential downsides to the vaccination process and we were even encouraged, albeit subtly, to debunk anyone who dared question the safety of the many vaccines in circulation.

What we didnt learn as students, and something you dont commonly hear about when being vaccinated, is what a vaccines ingredients or contaminants are (not to mention their potential side effects).

The microbial, or bacteriological, realm inside us always continued to intrigue me. Even after completing my formal studies at university and commencing work as a medical laboratory scientist, I conducted personal research into this unique world in my downtime. It wasnt until more recent years however, that I came across research papers and articles on vaccines that led me to develop some reservations in regards to their manufacture. This was literally the first time, after many years of studying medicine and working in the healthcare sector, that vaccines became a concern to me.

Having two teenage kids who are both fully vaccinated, healthy and without allergies or disabilities of any kind, I cant say my concern over vaccines and their side effects related to me personally. Yet having worked at a medical clinic for many years it was not lost on me how often children were falling ill and being diagnosed with some type of disease. As I started to research further, I began to wonder whether there could be a valid correlation between vaccines and at least some of these diagnosed childhood diseases.

Trying to find such a correlation turned out to be more difficult than expected. Vaccine research is often convoluted or else too narrowly focused. I also came to realize how difficult it is to distinguish between legitimate research and biased research. It became clear to me that many of the research papers I was studying were misrepresenting true observations.

I have great respect for researchers and the passion they put into their work. The papers they publish are often ground-breaking and fascinating. Unfortunately though, science has its own version of fake news .

This was highlighted in shocking fashion in October of 2018 when the worlds news media reported that three academics Dr. Peter Boghossian, Helen Pluckrose and Dr. James Lindsay had cleverly exposed the weaknesses of scientific journals. In order to prove a point about shoddy research standards, they made up research and created their own data to fit a pre-conceived conclusion and sent these papers off to peer-reviewed journals. Some of these papers made it through peer review and were actually published.

That and other examples of serious flaws in the field of scientific research have forced me to view other scientists work with a more critical eye.

In the first part of this book, authors James and Lance Morcan put vaccine ingredients under the microscope one at a time and explain their effects on cells within the human body. This is a journey like no other. The reader is given an insight into how the vaccine ingredients themselves impact our cells and what happens to us when our cells are exposed to them.

The second part of this book inspects the various illnesses associated with the ingredients found in childhood vaccines. At times the dangers seem so obvious you start wondering why it isnt clear to everyone.

Vaccine Science Revisited opens your eyes to so much more than just vaccines. It makes the reader realize how affected we are by our environment in general. And all of a sudden, all the various disorders humankind puts up with start making more sense. We are shown how multitudes of factors play their part and how these make it so difficult for medical professionals to determine a specific cause for an illness. Because most likely, there isnt a specific cause, but an accumulation of multiple causes.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?»

Look at similar books to Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed?»

Discussion, reviews of the book Vaccine Science Revisited: Are Childhood Immunizations As Safe As Claimed? and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.