• Complain

Chris White - The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory

Here you can read online Chris White - The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2015, publisher: CWM Publishing, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    CWM Publishing
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Never before has such a complete refutation of the Islamic Antichrist theory been in print.
Chris White critiques all the major arguments from Islamic Antichrist proponents such as Joel Richardson and Walid Shoebat in a respectful but poignant way. He uses sound methods of biblical interpretation to show that the Islamic Antichrist theory is seriously flawed.
This book refutes all the major arguments for the Islamic Antichrist theory and reveals new discoveries about the origins of Islamic end times beliefs which call into question claims of Islamic Antichrist theorists concerning the supposed similarities of figures like The Mahdi and the Antichrist, Isa and the False Prophet, and the Dajjal and Jesus.
You will never see the Islamic Antichrist theory the same way again.
Topics Covered in the book:
The Islamic Empire being in view in the legs of the statue of Daniel 2 and the last beast of Daniel 7
The people of the prince in Daniel 9 referring to Muslims
The Assyrian In Isaiah and Micah
Types of Antichrist
Mystery Babylon being Saudi Arabia
The Mark of the Beast being Arabic letters instead of numbers
The 7th head of Revelation 17 being the Islamic Empire
Gog as the Antichrist
Various refutations of the theories concerning the Islamic Mahdi being the same as the Antichrist
And much more

Chris White: author's other books


Who wrote The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Islamic Antichrist Debunked A Comprehensive Critique By Chris White - photo 1
The Islamic Antichrist Debunked
A Comprehensive Critique
By Chris White
Copyright 2014 by Chris White
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher, addressed Attention: Permissions Coordinator, at the address below.
CWM Publishing
P.O. Box 272
Ducktown TN 37326
The Islamic Antichrist Debunked A Comprehensive Critique / Chris White
ISBN: 978-0-9912329-4-9
Cover image by M. S. Corley
Editing by Rene Holt
Unless otherwise stated, all Scripture is taken from the New King James Version.
Copyright 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
First Edition
Further information available at the authors website:
http://BibleProphecyTalk.com
Dedication
To Connie, my wife and best friend.
Table of Contents
Part 3
Part 4
Appendices
Preface
The theory that the Antichrist will be a Muslim has become increasingly popular in the years following 9/11. The rise of extremist groups like ISIL/ISIS and Al-Qaeda have also contributed to many Christians asking themselves or their pastors if its possible that the great enemy of last days, the Antichrist, might in fact be a Muslim.
I myself used to hold to the Islamic Antichrist theory, and I, therefore understand and sympathize with many of the arguments that people make for it. However, I have since come to believe that the Islamic Antichrist theory, when examined closely, does not line up with the Bible and that many of the arguments made in its defense can be shown to be false with certainty.
This book is intended to be a comprehensive refutation of all the major arguments that are used to support the Islamic Antichrist theory. Though many great scholars and teachers have written articles against this theory, there has not to date been a resource that attempts to systematically refute all the points that are raised in defense of the view.
Since it is my sincere hope that this book will be useful to as many people as possible, I have tried to keep my own personal views about the origin and nature of the Antichrist to an absolute minimum, choosing instead to argue against the Islamic Antichrist theory without presupposing an alternative origin for the Antichrist. In other words I wrote this book in a way that the reader can agree with, no matter what his views on the Antichrist are.
The first and longest part of this book will describe and refute the primary arguments that Islamic Antichrist proponents make in support of their theory, whether those arguments are from Scripture or are based on circumstantial evidence. Examples of the types of arguments in this section include the Islamic Empire being in view in Daniel 2 and 7, the Assyrian in Isaiah and Micah 5 referring to the Antichrist, and the Mark of the Beast being an Arabic word and not a number, among many others.
The second part of this book will examine the claims of Islamic Antichrist proponents regarding Islamic eschatological figures such as the Mahdi, Isa, and the Dajjal. The Islamic Antichrist theory relies greatly upon comparisons of these figures with Christian counterparts such as The Antichrist, The False Prophet, and Jesus. I will spend quite a lot of time discussing the origin of Islamic eschatology, and then take the claims of Islamic Antichrist theorists about these Islamic eschatological figures one by one in an effort to refute their arguments.
In the third section of this book I will look at some of the logical inconsistencies with the claims of the Islamic Antichrist theorist using the doctrines that what we know to be true about the Antichrist from Scripture.
In the fourth and final section, I will discuss why I believe the Islamic Antichrist theory is not just wrong but extremely dangerous. In this section I will break my self- imposed limitations on discussing my own personal views about the nature and origin of the Antichrist, and though I will not argue for my personal position, I will ask the reader to consider the potentially disastrous results that the Islamic Antichrist theory could cause if my view is correct.
In this book I will be quoting extensively from Joel Richardson, who I believe is the most intelligent and articulate advocate for the Islamic Antichrist theory. I respect Mr. Richardson greatly, both as a fellow brother in Christ and as a researcher. On occasion I will also reference Walid Shoebats views, particularly on issues that Richardson has not published, like the Mark of the Beast, and Mystery Babylon. These two men are the most responsible for the promotion of the Islamic Antichrist theory, and it is often their work that is referenced when pastors teach this view. Therefore, I have intentionally limited the authors I will be directly referencing to these two men. I want to say at the outset that I appreciate Shoebat and Richardson greatly, especially because through their efforts a large number of Christians are considering end times matters seriously for the first time. Though I may disagree with them on certain issues, as Christians we agree on what matters the most.
Part 1
Examining the Arguments
Chapter 1
Nebuchadnezzars Dream
The second chapter of the book of Daniel describes Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, having a dream that troubles him greatly. In his dream he saw a statue of a man consisting of four metals, a head of gold, a chest and arms of silver, a belly and thighs of bronze, and legs of iron. The bottom part of this statues legs was mixed with both iron and clay.
In verse 36 Daniel begins to interpret Nebuchadnezzars dream. He explains that the different metals in the statue represent different kingdoms that will appear on earth. He explicitly tells us that the head represents Nebuchadnezzars Babylonian kingdom, and while he doesnt give us the names of the other three kingdoms, they are believed by the vast majority of Christian scholars to be Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome, in that order.
Islamic Antichrist theorists, such as Joel Richardson, attempt to make a case that the legs of iron, commonly identified as Rome, is actually the Islamic Empire which existed from 632 AD to 1923. Richardsons main argument centers on Daniel 2:40 which seems to suggest that the legs of iron kingdom somehow conquers all the other kingdoms that came before it (Babylon, Medo-Persia, and Greece).
And the fourth kingdom shall be as strong as iron, inasmuch as iron breaks in pieces and shatters everything; and like iron that crushes, that kingdom will break in pieces and crush all the others. (Daniel 2:40)
Richardson believes that crushing all the others is a reference to a kingdom being able to claim that it is holding all the land that the previous empires held in history. He makes the case that Rome cannot be the fourth kingdom because even at its largest point, the geographical borders of the Roman Empire didnt encompass all of the territory that other empires on the list held. For example, Babylon and Medo-Persia held some territories which were much further east than Rome ever reached, and therefore Rome cannot be said to have crushed the others, but that the Islamic Empire which followed the Roman Empire could make that claim.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory»

Look at similar books to The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Islamic Antichrist Debunked: A Comprehensive Critique of the Muslim Antichrist Theory and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.