• Complain

Bill Brewer - Perception and Reason

Here you can read online Bill Brewer - Perception and Reason full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1999, publisher: Oxford University Press, USA, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Bill Brewer Perception and Reason
  • Book:
    Perception and Reason
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press, USA
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1999
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Perception and Reason: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Perception and Reason" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Bill Brewer presents an original view of the role of conscious experience in the acquisition of empirical knowledge. He argues that perceptual experiences must provide reasons for empirical beliefs if there are to be any determinate beliefs at all about particular objects in the world. This fresh approach to epistemology turns away from the search for necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge and works instead from a theory of understanding in a particular area.

Bill Brewer: author's other books


Who wrote Perception and Reason? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Perception and Reason — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Perception and Reason" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Brewer Bill St Catherines College Oxford Perception and Reason Print ISBN - photo 1
Brewer, Bill , St Catherine's College, Oxford
Perception and Reason
Print ISBN 0199250456, 2002
doi:10.1093/0199250456.001.0001
Abstract: Discusses the role of conscious experiences in the acquisition of empirical knowledge. Most epistemology of perception takes a person's possession of beliefs about the mind-independent world for granted and goes on to ask what further conditions these beliefs must meet if they are to be cases of knowledge. I argue that this approach is completely mistaken. Perceptual experiences must provide reasons for empirical beliefs if there are to be any determinate beliefs about particular objects in the world at all. So there are epistemic requirements upon the very possibility of empirical belief. The crucial epistemological role of experience lies in its essential contribution to the subject's understanding of certain perceptual demonstrative contents, simply grasping which provides him with a reason to endorse them in belief. I explain in detail how this is so; defend my position against a wide range of objections; compare and contrast it with a number of influential alternative views in the area; and bring out its connection with Russell's Principle of Acquaintance, and its consequences for the compatibility of content externalism with an adequate account of self-knowledge.
Keywords: Brewer,empirical belief,empirical knowledge,epistemology,externalism,perception,perceptual content,perceptual experience,philosophy,philosophy of mind,reason,self-awareness,self-knowledge
Perception and Reason
end p.i
end p.ii
Perception and Reason
CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD
1999
end p.iii
Picture 2

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford
It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide in
Oxford New York
Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai
Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi
So Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto
Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and in certain other countries
Published in the United States
by Oxford University Press Inc., New York
Bill Brewer 1999
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First published 1999
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate
reprographcs rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction
outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Data available
ISBN 0-19-823567-4
end p.iv
To Cathy, Ellie, and Daniel
end p.v
end p.vi
Acknowledgements
John Campbell and Naomi Eilan have been a constant source of inspiration to me throughout the long period during which my ideas for this book have been taking shape. Their philosophical depth and direction have given me a model to emulate; their constructive criticism is evidentto me at leastin every chapter; and their friendship, encouragement, and support have been vital. I would like to take this opportunity to thank them both very much indeed for all that they have done.
Through discussions and comments in various contexts over the years, many other people have made a very significant and much appreciated contribution to this work. I would like to thank Michael Ayers, Jos Bermdez, Justin Broackes, Quassim Cassam, David Charles, Bill Child, Martin Davies, Bob Frazier, Lizzie Fricker, Marcus Giaquinto, Bob Hargrave, Christopher Hookway, Jennifer Hornsby, Susan Hurley, Wolfgang Knne, Mike Martin, Peter Milne, Adrian Moore, Paul O'Grady, Manuel Perez Otero, David Owens, Christopher Peacocke, Carolyn Price, Daniel Quesada, Johannes Roessler, Ernest Sosa, Helen Steward, Tom Stoneham, Rowland Stout, Peter Sullivan, Mark Textor, Charles Travis, James Van Cleve, Ralph Walker, Asa Wikforss, and Tim Williamson. Special thanks are due to John Campbell, Naomi Eilan, Lizzie Fricker, Christopher Peacocke, Helen Steward, and Rowland Stout, who also gave me extended written comments on a previous version of the complete manuscript. Many graduate students have heard or read earlier versions of this material and provided extremely helpful feedback. I would like to acknowledge in particular the contributions of Christian Beyer, Alan Brown, Lisa Busch, Imogen Dickie, Brie Gertler, Greville Healey, Jason Kawall, Michael Oliva Cordoba, Kirsten Petzold, Hannah Pickard, Baron Reed, Angus Ritchie, Mark Siebel, and Christian Stein. I would also like to record my deep intellectual debt here to the formative writings of Peter Strawson, Michael Dummett, Michael Ayers, Gareth Evans, John McDowell, and Christopher Peacocke.
end p.vii
I am grateful to my colleges, St Catherine's and Magdalen, and also to Oxford University, for granting me sabbatical leave for two terms in 1997, during which a first draft of this book was written, and especially to the British Academy's Humanities Research Board for funding one of these terms of leave, without which this would certainly not have been possible. I made my final revisions, read proofs, and prepared the index during a very enjoyable semester visiting the University of California at Berkeley. I appreciate all the support and hospitality I received there. Although it was late in the day for the book, I had extremely productive discussions of the issues it addresses in Berkeley with Cheryl Chen, Alan Code, Eddie Cushman, Donald Davidson, Hannah Ginsborg, Peter Hanks, Sean Kelly, Jonathan Lebowitsch, Josh Sheptow, and Richard Wollheim.
Peter Momtchiloff of Oxford University Press has been a wonderfully supportive and flexible editor, from the moment he first approached me about this project until its final completion. I thank him very much for his enthusiasm, encouragement, advice and patience. Maura High was a first class copy editor, whose experience, wisdom, and keen eye are much appreciated. I am also very grateful to Angela Blackburn, my excellent production editor and typesetter.
I would also like to thank the following:
Cambridge University Press for permission to use material from my paper 'Experience and Reason in Perception', in A. O'Hear (ed.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Mind, in Chapters .
Blackwell Publishers Ltd. for permission to use material from my paper 'Internalism and Perceptual Knowledge', European Journal of Philosophy, (1996), 259-75, in Chapter .
The editor and publishers of the American Philosophical Quarterly for permission to use material from my paper 'Foundations of Perceptual knowledge', American Philosophical Quarterly, (1997), 41-55, in Chapter .
I should offer a word of explanation about the photograph on the cover. An unfolded origami figure in a sense displays what would
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Perception and Reason»

Look at similar books to Perception and Reason. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Perception and Reason»

Discussion, reviews of the book Perception and Reason and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.