Stefano Marino - Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations
Here you can read online Stefano Marino - Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: De Gruyter, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations
- Author:
- Publisher:De Gruyter
- Genre:
- Year:2020
- Rating:4 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Stefano Marino: author's other books
Who wrote Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
ISBN 9783110596137
e-ISBN (PDF) 9783110596496
e-ISBN (EPUB) 9783110592818
Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.
2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Throughout the volume, references to the Kantian corpus are given parenthetically in the Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant edited by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19922012), followed in square brackets by the volume and page numbers of the standard critical edition of Kants Gesammelte Schriften (Ak.), edited by the Kniglich Preuische [later Deutsche] Akademie der Wissenschaften and, from volume 24, by the Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Gttingen (Berlin: George Reimer/[later] Walter de Gruyter, 1900). In case of not yet translated texts, the quotations and passages are inserted by referring directly to volume and page numbers in the Akademie edition.
References to the following works of Kant are preceded by these abbreviations:
APAnthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. In: Anthropology, History, and Education. Robert B. Louden/Gnter Zller (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 227429.
CFThe Conflict of the Faculties. In: Religion and Rational Theology. Allen W. Wood/George di Giovanni (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 233328.
Corr.Correspondence. Arnulf Zweig (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
CPJCritique of the Power of Judgment. Paul Guyer/Allen W. Wood (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
CPRCritique of Pure Reason. Paul Guyer/Allen W. Wood (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
CPrRCritique of Practical Reason. In: Practical Philosophy. Mary J. Gregor (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 133272.
IUHIdes for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. In: Anthropology, History, and Education. Robert B. Louden/Gnter Zller (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 107120.
RReligion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. In: Religion and Rational Theology. Allen W. Wood/George di Giovanni (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 39216.
Refl.Reflexionen zur Anthropologie. In: Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 15, pp. 55654.
V-Anth/BusoltVorlesungen Wintersemester 17881789 Busolt. In: Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 25, pp. 14311532.
Other abbreviations:
AEDewey, John: Art as Experience (1st ed. 1934). In: The Later Works of John Dewey. Vol. 10. Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.
AMCHorkheimer, Max: Art and Mass Culture. In: Critical Theory. Selected Essays, transl. Matthew J. OConnell and others. New York: Continuum, 2002, pp. 273290.
GW 1Gadamer, Hans-Georg: Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik (1st ed. 1960). In: Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 1. Tbingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1990.
KBACohen, Hermann: Kants Begrndung der sthetik (1st ed. 1889). In: Werke. Vol. 3. Helmut Holzhey (Ed.). Hildesheim, Zurich, New York: Olms, 2009.
KLLCassirer, Ernst: Kants Leben und Lehre (1st ed. 1918). In: Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 8. Birgit Recki (Ed.). Hamburg: Meiner, 2001.
KLTCassirer, Ernst: Kants Life and Thought, transl. James Haden, intr. Stephan Krner. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1981.
KPEco, Umberto: Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition, transl. Alastair McEwen. London: Secker & Warburg, 2000.
ParDerrida, Jacques: Parergon. In: The Truth in Painting, transl. Geoffrey Bennington and Ian McLeod. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987, pp. 15147.
TCTHorkheimer, Max: Traditional and Critical Theory. In: Critical Theory: Selected Essays, transl. Matthew J. OConnell and others. New York: Continuum, 2002, pp. 188243.
TMGadamer, Hans-Georg: Truth and Method, 2nd ed., transl. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London, New York: Continuum, 2004.
UKpUPlessner, Helmuth: Untersuchungen zu einer Kritik der philosophischen Urteilskraft (1st ed. 1920). In: Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981, pp. 7321.
The Twentieth-Century Afterlife of Kants Critique of Aesthetic Judgment
Sections 1 and 3 of this Introduction were written together by both authors. Stefano Marino authored the introduction to section 2.2. as well as subsections 2.2.1. and 2.2.4. Pietro Terzi wrote the introduction to section 2, section 2.1, and subsections 2.2.2 and 2.2.3. The general structure and contents of this Introduction, however, have been planned, discussed and conceived together by both authors.
It is beyond doubt that Immanuel Kants Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790) represents one of the most important texts of modern philosophy. Following the Critique of Pure Reason (11781; 21787) and the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), Kants third Critique constitutes the theoretical culmination and completion of the systematic philosophical project Kant had started twenty years before. It began with his 1770 dissertation On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World, and his discovery of the possibility of an a priori foundation of human knowledge. With this came a consequent aim: to develop this discovery in a full-blown way into an investigation of the bounds of sensibility and of reason, including a doctrine of taste, of metaphysics and of moral philosophy. The third Critique is therefore not only an end, i.e. the final part of the three-sided system of transcendental philosophy, but also marks the beginning of new possible paths of thought, exemplified by the development that certain Kantian concepts and doctrines presented in the first, the second and the third Critiques undergo in some of his later writings, including Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone (1793), Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798) and the Opus postumum (1804).
The Critique of the Power of Judgment stands out for its unique importance not only in the context of Kants own thinking but also, as we have said, in the context of modern philosophy as a whole, and particularly in the context of modern and contemporary aesthetics. As has been noted by Gnter Figal, Baumgartens Aesthetica, to which philosophical aesthetics owes its name, was intended as an elucidation of aisthetik episteme, of perceptual knowledge, but even though Baumgartens [was] the first systematic attempt in modern philosophy to dignify sensible or sensibly dominated knowledge in its peculiarity [], Kants Critique of Judgment was more influential in this regard; philosophical aesthetics really begins with him, and it was Kant who first gave philosophical aesthetics a significance pertaining to philosophy as such (, p. 28).
At the same time, as several important scholars of Kant have observed, the Critique of the Power of Judgment is a complex, multi-layered, heterogeneous, discontinuous and, so to speak, patchy work. This, on the one hand, has contributed to the articulated, branching (and therefore fascinating)
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations»
Look at similar books to Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.