VALUES AND INVOLVEMENT IN
A GRAMMAR SCHOOL
Founded by KARL MANNHEIM
THE SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION
In 28 Volumes
I | Adolescent Girls in Approved Schools | Richardson |
II | Adult Education | Peers |
III | Down Stream | Dale and Griffith |
IV | Education After School | Stimson |
V | Education and Society | Ottaway |
VI | Education and Society in Modern France | Fraser |
VII | Education and Society in Modern Germany | Samuel and Thomas |
VIII | Education and the Handicapped: 1760-1960 | Pritchard |
IX | Education in Israel | Bentwich |
X | Education in Transition | Dent |
XI | The Education of the Countryman | Burton |
XII | The Educational Thought and Influence of Matthew Arnold | Connell |
XIII | English Primary Education (Part One): Schools | Blythe |
XIV | English Primary Education (Part Two): Background | Blythe |
XV | From School to University | Dale |
XVI | Helvetius | Cumming |
XVII | Mission of the University (The above title is not available through Routledge in North America) | Ortega y Gasset |
XVIII | Parity and Prestige in English Secondary Education | Banks |
XIX | Problems in Education | Holmes |
XX | The School Inspector | Edmonds |
XXI | The Sixth Form and College Entrance | Morrts |
XXII | Social Class and the Comprehensive School | Ford |
XXIII | The Social Psychology of Education | Fleming |
XXIV | The Social Purposes of Education | Collier |
XXV | Social Relations in a Secondary School | Hargreaves |
XXVI | Total Education | Jacks |
XXVII | Values and Involvement in a Grammar School | King |
XXVIII | Who Shall Be Educated? | Warner, Havighurst and Loeb |
(The above title is not available through Routledge in North America) |
VALUES AND INVOLVEMENT
IN A GRAMMAR SCHOOL
by
RONALD KING
First published in 1969 by
Routledge
Reprinted in 1998, 2000, 2002
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, 0X14 4RN
Transferred to Digital Printing 2007
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group
1969 Ronald King
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced
or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means,
now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying
and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publishers.
The publishers have made every effort to contact authors/copyright holders
of the works reprinted in The International Library of Sociology.
This has not been possible in every case, however, and we would
welcome correspondence from those individuals/companies
we have been unable to trace.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A CIP catalogue record for this book
is available from the British Library
Values and Involvement in a Grammar School
ISBN 0-415-17778-2
ISBN 978-1-136-27403-9 (ePub)
The Sociology of Education: 28 Volumes
ISBN 0-415-17833-9
The International Library of Sociology: 274 Volumes
ISBN 0-415-17838-X
Publishers Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint
but points out that some imperfections in the original may be apparent
Contents
There are many people to thank for their help in many different ways. Firstly, the teachers, the pupils and their parents of the school for their help and co-operation, and the headmaster for allowing me to carry out an investigation that few head teachers would permit in their schools, I am gtateful to the Chief Education Officer of the London County Council (now the Inner London Education Authority) for his permission to survey the parents, and to the Central Research Fund of the University of London, which helped towards the cost of the investigation.
I also thank Mrs. Jean Floud who started me on this study, and Douglas Young for his technical advice. My main thanks go to Professor Basil Bernstein who guided me so ably through the major part of the study. Finally, I thank my wife for her valuable help which she has sustained so patiently, so long.
RONALD KING
This study is in the nature of an exploration. This introduction may help the reader follow its path.
Jean Floud and A. H. Halsey in their Trend Report on the Sociology of Education of 1958 drew attention to the neglect of the sociology of the school that then existed. In the past ten years this neglect has been to some extent remedied in Britain by a number of interesting studies, some of which are referred to in this book. However, K. E. Shaw, writing only recently (1966) was still able to pose the question, Why no sociology of schools ? In answering his own question he suggests that teachers, and especially head teachers, are suspicious of research about schools, and, perhaps understandably, feel they are being judged rather than studied. It may also be the case that teachers feel they know enough about schools, and that research is unnecessary.
This diagnosis points to two important problems in the sociological investigation of schools. Firstly, how to convince the teachers that the approach is non-evaluative, and secondly to establish that by being non-evaluative the school can be known in a different and objective way. One response to these problems has been for sociologists to work from within the schools. For example, David Hargreaves (1967) became a teacher in the school he studied. This technique is not without its problems, as Hargreaves has pointed out, but it does give the investigator a role in the school he is studying that can be accepted and understood by its teachers and pupils.
In making this study of a boys grammar school in London I did not assume the role of teacher in order to carry out the investigation; my appointment to its teaching staff pre-dates the beginning of the study. Instead, I tried to assume the necessary objectivity, and as I shall explain in , this was not without its difficulties.
The school, whose history and current organization are outlined in ).
The pupils were drawn from the second, fifth and sixth forms of the school, and from its top and lower streams. The school recruited its pupils from different kinds of social backgrounds, so that the major independent variables in the analysis were, age, stream status and family origin. In addition, older pupils were also characterized by their subject specialization, and by their sometimes being prefects, so enabling further analyses based on these distinctions.