Todd Stanley - Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning
Here you can read online Todd Stanley - Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: Routledge, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning
- Author:
- Publisher:Routledge
- Genre:
- Year:2020
- Rating:5 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning equips teachers with effective questioning strategies and:
Todd Stanley: author's other books
Who wrote Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
- Abla, C., & Maxfield, L. (2017). Higher-order questioning inspires higher-level thinking. McRel International. Retrieved from https://www.mcrel.org/higher-order-questioning-inspires-higher-level-thinking
- Aishwarya.gudadhe. (2015). A map of how divergent thinking works. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_thinking#/media/File:Final_divergent_thinking.jpg
- Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
- Anderson, L. W., & Sosniak, L. A. (Eds). (1994). Blooms taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
- Bisol, J. L. (2015). An ostentation of tutoring. Author.
- Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans Green.
- Brulles, D., & Brown, K. L. (2018). A teachers guide to flexible grouping and collaborative learning: Form, manage, assess, and differentiate in groups. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
- Buono, S. (n.d.). Developing higher order thinking questions to promote student learning [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.palmyraschools.com/ps/Departments/Curriculum%20and%20Instruction/Professional%20Development/Higher%20Order%20Thinking%20Presentation.pdf
- Busteed, B. (2013). The school cliff: Student engagement drops with each school year. Gallup. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/170525/school-cliff-student-engagement-drops-school-year.aspx
- Butler, H. A., Pentoney, C., & Bong, M. P. (2017). Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 3846.
- Cardellichio, T., & Field, W. (1997). Seven strategies that encourage neural branching. Educational Leadership, 54(6), 3336.
- Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning, University of Illinois. (n.d.). Questioning strategies. Retrieved from https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/teaching-learning/resources/teaching-strategies/questioning-strategies
- Center for Learning, Vanderbilt University. (2016). Blooms taxonomy. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/photos/vandycft/29428436431
- Christensen, C. L. (2017). What is the impact of effective questioning and critical, relevant conversations on sixth grade science students agentic engagement? School of Education Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations. 4307.
- Cook, C. R., Fiat, A., Larson, M., Daikos, C., Slemrod, T., Holland, E. A., Renshaw, T. (2018). Positive greetings at the door: Evaluation of a low-cost, high-yield proactive classroom management strategy. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 149159.
- Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (Eds.). (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Cox, J. (n.d.). Teaching strategies that enhance higher order thinking. TeachHUB. Retrieved from https://www.teachhub.com/teaching-strategies-enhance-higher-order-thinking
- Edward R. Murrow High School. (n.d.). Costas three levels of questioning. Retrieved from https://www.ermurrowhs.org/uploads/6/2/6/8/6268393/costas-questioning-14.pdf
- Fusco, E. (2012). Effective questioning strategies in the classroom: A step-by-step approach to engaged thinking and learning, K8. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Gallagher, J. J., & Aschner, M. J. (1963). A preliminary report on analyses of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 9, 183194.
- Gast, G. (n.d.). Effective questioning and classroom talk: To develop learning & higher order thinking, promoting imagination, speculation, creative thinking & to pitch a suitable challenge level. Retrieved from http://www.nsead.org/downloads/Effective_Questioning&Talk.pdf
- Great Schools Partnership. (2014). Rigor. The Glossary of Education Reform for Journalists, Parents, and Community Members. Retrieved from https://www.edglossary.org/rigor
- Hattie, J. (2018). Hattie ranking: 252 influences and effect sizes related to student achievement. Visible Learning. Retrieved from https://visible-learning.org/hattie-ranking-influences-effect-sizes-learning-achievement
- Heick, T. (2019). 12 questions to ask your students on the first day of school. Teach Thought. Retrieved from https://www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/12-questions-ask-students-first-day-school
- Jaeger, S. (n.d.). Question generator. Retrieved from https://www.sethjaeger.com/p/question-generator.html
- Levy, J., & Sidhu, P. (2013). In the US, 21st century skills linked to word success: Real-world problem-solving most strongly tied to work quality. Gallup. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/162818/21st-century-skills-linked-work-success.aspx
- Ludema, J. & Johnson, A. (2018). Five questions you can ask instead of how are you? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/amberjohnson-jimludema/2018/04/05/five-questions-you-can-ask-instead-of-how-are-you/#68da19d49683
- McComas, W. F., & Rossier, L. A. (n.d.). Asking more effective questions. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/sites/ca.centre-for-teaching-excellence/files/uploads/files/asking_better_questions.pdf
- Mississippi Department of Education. (2009). Webbs depth of kno-wledge guide: Career and technical education definitions. Retrieved from https://www.aps.edu/sapr/documents/resources/Webbs_DOK_Guide.pdf
- Msingh209. (2012). A map of how convergent thinking works. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_thinking#/media/File:Map_of_Convergent_Thinking.jpg
- Musallam, R. (2013). 3 rules to spark learning [Video file]. TED. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/ramsey_musallam_3_rules_to_spark_learning/details?nolanguage=en
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English language arts. Washington, DC: Author.
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Northern Indiana ESC. (n.d.). Depth of knowledge (DOK) overview chart. Retrieved from http://www.niesc.k12.in.us/index.cfm/staff-development/public-consulting-group-co-teaching-session/depthofknowledgechart-pdf
- Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Author.
- Scholastic. (n.d.). What makes paper airplanes fly? Retrieved from https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-content/what-makes-paper-airplanes-fly
- Smart, J. B., & Marshall, J. C. (2012). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Science Teacher Education, 24, 249267.
- Smith, H., & Wentworth, M. (2019). Chalk talk. School Reform Initiative. Retrieved from https://www.schoolreforminitiative.org/download/chalk-talk
- The Teacher Toolkit. (n.d.). Exit ticket. Retrieved from http://www.theteachertoolkit.com/index.php/tool/exit-ticket
- Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning»
Look at similar books to Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book Promoting Rigor Through Higher Level Questioning and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.