• Complain

R. R. Reno - Genesis

Here you can read online R. R. Reno - Genesis full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2010, publisher: Baker Publishing Group, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

R. R. Reno Genesis
  • Book:
    Genesis
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Baker Publishing Group
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Genesis: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Genesis" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This addition to the well-received Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible offers a theological exegesis of Genesis.

R. R. Reno: author's other books


Who wrote Genesis? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Genesis — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Genesis" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make


GENESIS

Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible

Series Editors

R. R. Reno, General Editor
Creighton University
Omaha, Nebraska

Robert W. Jenson
Center of Theological
Inquiry Princeton, New Jersey

Robert Louis Wilken
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia

Ephraim Radner
Wycliffe College
Toronto, Ontario

Michael Root Lutheran
Theological Southern Seminary
Columbia, South Carolina

George Sumner
Wycliffe College
Toronto, Ontario


GENESIS

R . R . R E N O

2010 by R R Reno Published by Brazos Press a division of Baker Publishing - photo 1

2010 by R. R. Reno

Published by Brazos Press
a division of Baker Publishing Group
P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287
www.brazospress.com

Printed in the United States of America

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any meansfor example, electronic, photocopy, recordingwithout the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Reno, Russell R., 1959
Genesis / R.R. Reno.
p. cm. (Brazos theological commentary on the Bible)
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-1-58743-091-6 (cloth)
1. Bible. O.T. GenesisCommentaries. I. Title.
BS1235.53.R46 2010
222 .1107dc22

2009025584

Unless otherwise indicated, scripture quotations are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1952 (2nd edition, 1971) by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 6 5 4 3 2 1


For Peter Ochs and his merry band of scriptural reasoners

CONTENTS

Near the beginning of his treatise against Gnostic interpretations of the Bible, Against the Heresies, Irenaeus observes that Scripture is like a great mosaic depicting a handsome king. It is as if we were owners of a villa in Gaul who had ordered a mosaic from Rome. It arrives, and the beautifully colored tiles need to be taken out of their packaging and put into proper order according to the plan of the artist. The difficulty, of course, is that Scripture provides us with the individual pieces, but the order and sequence of various elements are not obvious. The Bible does not come with instructions that would allow interpreters to simply place verses, episodes, images, and parables in order as a worker might follow a schematic drawing in assembling the pieces to depict the handsome king. The mosaic must be puzzled out. This is precisely the work of scriptural interpretation.

Origen has his own image to express the difficulty of working out the proper approach to reading the Bible. When preparing to offer a commentary on the Psalms he tells of a tradition handed down to him by his Hebrew teacher:

The Hebrew said that the whole divinely inspired Scripture may be likened, because of its obscurity, to many locked rooms in our house. By each room is placed a key, but not the one that corresponds to it, so that the keys are scattered about beside the rooms, none of them matching the room by which it is placed. It is a difficult task to find the keys and match them to the rooms that they can open. We therefore know the Scriptures that are obscure only by taking the points of departure for understanding them from another place because they have their interpretive principle scattered among them.

As is the case for Irenaeus, scriptural interpretation is not purely local. The key in Genesis may best fit the door of Isaiah, which in turn opens up the meaning of Matthew. The mosaic must be put together with an eye toward the overall plan.

Irenaeus, Origen, and the great cloud of premodern biblical interpreters assumed that puzzling out the mosaic of Scripture must be a communal project. The Bible is vast, heterogeneous, full of confusing passages and obscure words, and difficult to understand. Only a fool would imagine that he or she could work out solutions alone. The way forward must rely upon a tradition of reading that Irenaeus reports has been passed on as the rule or canon of truth that functions as a confession of faith. Anyone, he says, who keeps unchangeable in himself the rule of truth received through baptism will recognize the names and sayings and parables of the scriptures. Modern scholars debate the content of the rule on which Irenaeus relies and commends, not the least because the terms and formulations Irenaeus himself uses shift and slide. Nonetheless, Irenaeus assumes that there is a body of apostolic doctrine sustained by a tradition of teaching in the church. This doctrine provides the clarifying principles that guide exegetical judgment toward a coherent overall reading of Scripture as a unified witness. Doctrine, then, is the schematic drawing that will allow the reader to organize the vast heterogeneity of the words, images, and stories of the Bible into a readable, coherent whole. It is the rule that guides us toward the proper matching of keys to doors.

If self-consciousness about the role of history in shaping human consciousness makes modern historical-critical study critical, then what makes modern study of the Bible modern is the consensus that classical Christian doctrine distorts interpretive understanding. Benjamin Jowett, the influential nineteenth-century English classical scholar, is representative. In his programmatic essay On the Interpretation of Scripture, he exhorts the biblical reader to disengage from doctrine and break its hold over the interpretive imagination. The simple words of that book, writes Jowett of the modern reader, he tries to preserve absolutely pure from the refinements or distinctions of later times. The modern interpreter wishes to clear away the remains of dogmas, systems, controversies, which are encrusted upon the words of Scripture. The disciplines of close philological analysis would enable us to separate the elements of doctrine and tradition with which the meaning of Scripture is encumbered in our own day. The lens of understanding must be wiped clear of the hazy and distorting film of doctrine.

Postmodernity, in turn, has encouraged us to criticize the critics. Jowett imagined that when he wiped away doctrine he would encounter the biblical text in its purity and uncover what he called the original spirit and intention of the authors. In these and many other instances, often written in the heat of ecclesiastical controversy or out of the passion of ascetic commitment, we tend to think Jowett correct: doctrine is a distorting film on the lens of understanding.

However, is what we commonly think actually the case? Are readers naturally perceptive? Do we have an unblemished, reliable aptitude for the divine? Have we no need for disciplines of vision? Do our attention and judgment need to be trained, especially as we seek to read Scripture as the living word of God? According to Augustine, we all struggle to journey toward God, who is our rest and peace. Yet our vision is darkened and the fetters of worldly habit corrupt our judgment. We need training and instruction in order to cleanse our minds so that we might find our way toward God. The covenant with Israel, the coming of Christ, the gathering of the nations into the churchall these things are gathered up into the rule of faith, and they guide the vision and form of the soul toward the end of fellowship with God. In Augustines view, the reading of Scripture both contributes to and benefits from this divine pedagogy. With countless variations in both exegetical conclusions and theological frameworks, the same pedagogy of a doctrinally ruled reading of Scripture characterizes the broad sweep of the Christian tradition from Gregory the Great through Bernard and Bonaventure, continuing across Reformation differences in both John Calvin and Cornelius Lapide, Patrick Henry and Bishop Bossuet, and on to more recent figures such as Karl Barth and Hans Urs von Balthasar.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Genesis»

Look at similar books to Genesis. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Bruce K. Waltke - Genesis: A Commentary
Genesis: A Commentary
Bruce K. Waltke
Michael Allen - Ephesians
Ephesians
Michael Allen
Jason Byassee - Psalms 101-150
Psalms 101-150
Jason Byassee
George Hunsinger - Philippians
Philippians
George Hunsinger
Douglas Harink - 1 & 2 Peter
1 & 2 Peter
Douglas Harink
Francesca Aran Murphy - 1 Samuel
1 Samuel
Francesca Aran Murphy
No cover
No cover
Matthew Levering
Griffiths - Song of Songs
Song of Songs
Griffiths
Thomas Joseph White - Exodus
Exodus
Thomas Joseph White
Reviews about «Genesis»

Discussion, reviews of the book Genesis and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.