PHILOSOPHY
BITES AGAIN
DAVID EDMONDS &
NIGEL WARBURTON
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
David Edmonds and Nigel Warburton 2014
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2014
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2014936064
ISBN 9780198702696
ebook ISBN 9780191007255
Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc
PREFACE
Philosophy Bites Again is the third volume of interviews based on our popular audio podcast Philosophy Bites. We are still amazed and delighted by the number of enthusiastic listeners this series has worldwide.
As with the earlier books, Philosophy Bites and Philosophy Bites Back, these are not verbatim transcripts of audio: in collaboration with the interviewees, weve adapted the interviews so that they work on the page. For some interviews, this has resulted in only minor tweaks; for others, the interviewees have suggested significant changes.
Philosophy Bites Back focused on the ideas of great dead philosophers, from Socrates to Derrida. This book returns to the format of the first, with topic-based interviews grouped under various themes.
Weve opened with a compilation of responses to the question, Who is the most impressive philosopher youve met? We sprang this question on our unsuspecting interviewees while making the series: these answers too have been edited for the book.
We launched Philosophy Bites in 2007, and since then weve made five spin-off series:
Ethics Bites ;
Bioethics Bites ;
Multiculturalism Bites ;
Free Speech Bites ; and
Social Science Bites .
We would like to thank the Open University for permission to use the Nancy Fraser and Sue Mendus interviews, which first appeared in the Multiculturalism Bites series. The Jeff McMahan interview is from Bioethics Bites, for which we received a grant from the Wellcome Trust.
But Philosophy Bites is parent to them all. At the time of going to press, we have conducted around 260 interviews and have had 21 million downloads. That success is largely down to the high quality of our contributors. For us, at least, the series continues to be both hugely enjoyable and educational. Its been a privilege to meet so many of the worlds leading philosophers, and to receive what amounts to private individual tuition on such a broad range of topics. Most of the people we have interviewed have been inspirational not just in the content of what they say, but in their contagious enthusiasm for thinking and ideas.
We have conducted many of our interviews at The Institute of Philosophy, part of London Universitythanks to Shahrar Ali and Barry Smith for arranging that. For a few of our interviews we have used office space at Oxfords Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, and would like to thank Rachel Gaminiratne, Nailya Nikitenko, Deborah Sheehan, and Miriam Wood, and the Director, Julian Savulescu. We would also like to thank Charles Styles, Hannah Warburton, Mollie Williamson, and Katrina Woolley for transcribing the interviews, and Hannah Edmonds for performing her traditional proofreading role. At the time of writing, Philosophy Bites the podcast series is self-funded; we are extremely grateful for donations that have come in via our website at , which have allowed us to keep on releasing episodes on a fortnightly basis.
Thanks to our partners Anna Motz and Liz Edmonds for putting up with our obsession with Philosophy Bites. The last time we dedicated a book in this series it was to three children. Another one has appeared on the scene. So this book is for Hannah, Joshua, Saul, and Isaac.
David Edmonds and Nigel Warburton
CONTENTS
Tim Bayne: The philosopher whos had the greatest impact on my development is my PhD supervisor David Chalmers. He has a wonderful ability to come into a debate and see the conceptual structure of it, and present it extremely clearly. One has the sense immediately on reading his work of whats going on. Very impressive.
John Campbell:Michael Dummett: the sense of depth and seriousness and intellectual power that he brought to the subject was unparalleled.
Nol Carroll: the late Arthur Danto: a man of exceeding rigour, but also incredibly imaginative, as anybody who has ever read any of his wonderful thought experiments, like the exactly nine red paintings in his book The Transfiguration of the Commonplace, will immediately recognize.
Tim Crane:Bernard Williams is probably the most impressive philosopher Ive met in terms of his brilliance, his breadth of knowledge, and his ability to say interesting things about so many different topics in philosophy.
Roger Crisp: I am fortunate, being in Oxford, to have met a lot of impressive philosophers. None of them was more impressive than Derek Parfit. Arguing with him can be a rather disturbing experience because its quite clear that once the argument starts hes about three steps ahead of everybody else.
Fiery Cushman: The two philosophers that Ive learnt the most from are both named Josh: Josh Greene and Josh Knobe. Each in his own way has been a huge source of insight.
Jonathan Dancy:Gareth Evans was terrifying. He was so quick, and his thought seemed to be so rich. Other people are less immediately impressive, but still at the same level. John McDowell I think of as like that. Gareth was all up there in your face. John is very gentle.
Daniel Dennett: I suppose it would be my mentor and friend Willard Van Orman Quine. I think he got more things right. He was dedicated to getting everything clear and straightforward, he hated jargon, and he had very deep philosophical insights that are still not properly appreciated.
Ronald Dworkin: Very hard question. Ill tell you two: John Rawls and Thomas Nagel. No, I take it back, I have to add Bernard Williams and Tim Scanlon