• Complain

Richard D. McKirahan - Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary

Here you can read online Richard D. McKirahan - Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Hackett Publishing Company, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Richard D. McKirahan Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary
  • Book:
    Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Hackett Publishing Company
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Since its publication in 1994, Richard McKirahans Philosophy Before Socrates has become the standard sourcebook in Presocratic philosophy. It provides a wide survey of Greek science, metaphysics, and moral and political philosophy, from their roots in myth to the philosophers and Sophists of the fifth century. A comprehensive selection of fragments and testimonia, translated by the author, is presented in the context of a thorough and accessible discussion. An introductory chapter deals with the sources of Presocratic and Sophistic texts and the special problems of interpretation they present.In its second edition, this work has been updated and expanded to reflect important new discoveries and the most recent scholarship. Changes and additions have been made throughout, the most significant of which are found in the chapters on the Pythagoreans, Parmenides, Zeno, Anaxagoras, and Empedocles, and the new chapter on Philolaus. The translations of some passages have been revised, as have some interpretations and discussions. A new Appendix provides translations of three Hippocratic writings and the Derveni papyrus.

Richard D. McKirahan: author's other books


Who wrote Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Philosophy Before Socrates

Second Edition

Philosophy Before Socrates

Second Edition

An Introduction with Texts and Commentary

Richard D. McKirahan

Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Indianapolis/Cambridge

Copyright 2010 by Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

All rights reserved

Printed in the United States of America

15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

For further information, please address

Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

P.O. Box 44937

Indianapolis, Indiana 46244-0937

www.hackettpublishing.com

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

McKirahan, Richard D.

Philosophy before Socrates : an introduction with texts and commentary / Richard D. McKirahan2nd ed.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p.) and indexes.

ISBN 978-1-60384-182-5 (pbk.)ISBN 978-1-60384-183-2 (cloth)

1. Pre-Socratic philosophers. I. Title.

B187.5.M35 2010

182dc22 2009040711

ePub ISBN: 978-1-60384-561-8

for Voula again, as always

Contents

Greek philosophy had been flourishing for over a century when Socrates was born (469 BCE). Socrates thought, as well as that of all later Greek philosophers, was strongly influenced by the work of the early pioneers in the field, both the philosopher-scientists known as Presocratics and the fifth-century Sophists. The theories, arguments, and concepts of the early Greek philosophers are also important and interesting in their own right. And yet this seminal period of philosophical and scientific activity is much less familiar than the work of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.

This state of affairs is partly, perhaps principally, due to the nature of the evidence about thinkers before the time of Plato and Aristotle. In contrast with these two great philosophers, many of whose works survive in entirety, not a single work of any of the Presocratic philosophers has been preserved from antiquity to the present, and we have only a few short writings of the Sophists. We are confronted instead with a variety of quotations and paraphrases of their words, summaries of their theories, biographical information (much of it fabricated), in some cases adaptations and extensions of their views, and also parodies and criticisms. These materials come from a wide range of authors who write with different purposes and biases, and whose reliability and philosophical and historical acumen vary enormously.

These circumstances have led some scholars to despair of the possibility of reaching the truth about the early philosophers. The present book, however, is founded on the belief that it is possible to sift through the information and develop interpretations which, though incomplete and not demonstrably correct, have a high degree of internal coherence, mutually reinforce one another, have some historical plausibility, and may be approximations to the original ideas and intentions of the thinkers in question.

Four features of this book deserve comment and explanation. First, since much of the fascination in dealing with early Greek philosophy comes from working out ones own interpretations of the evidence, I have made it a principle to present most, and in many cases all, of the fragments of the philosophers discussed, as well as other important evidence on their thought. Except in the few cases that are noted, the translations are my own. I have aimed to provide translations that are as literal as possible, given the differences between Greek and English. Readers are thus in a position to formulate their own understanding of the early philosophers and to form their own judgments of the interpretations I have put forward.

Second, since our knowledge of these philosophers is largely based on source materials other than their own writings, and since these materials are of unequal value, I have made a point of identifying the source of each passage and (in Chapter 1) of discussing the principal sources and commenting on their strengths and weaknesses. In this way readers can assess the value of the evidence and decide for themselves how to weigh it and how confidently to base an interpretation on it.

Third, during the period covered in this book, knowledge had not yet been divided into the separate categories of philosophy, science, and their subfields. Most of the Presocratic philosophers treated topics which we find more scientific than philosophical, and none of them drew clear lines between his philosophical and his scientific oeuvre. In fact, the earliest Presocratics focused mainly on issues that we assign to the fields of cosmology, meteorology, biology, and matter theory. Thus, in order to be faithful to the thought of the sixth- and fifth-century philosophers, philosophy before Socrates must include scientific issues as well; to omit topics we consider unphilosophical would be to amputate vital portions of their thought without which the remainder would make little sense. Accordingly, I have devoted rather more space to scientific topics than is usual in books of this sort, though in many cases much of the interest the scientific ideas have for us lies in the level of philosophical sophistication on which they are founded.

Fourth, the thinkers treated in this book lived in, and to some extent were the products of, particular times and places. Where possible and appropriate I have said something about their lives and their cultural environment; for these circumstances had important effects on the early Greek philosophers, just as the ideas of these men had important effects on Greek civilization.

My interest in early Greek philosophy and science began with graduate seminars on the Presocratics given at Harvard by the late G. E. L. Own, and my work owes a deep debt to his inspiring teaching and writings, even though I have come to disagree with some of his interpretations. John Murdochs courses on ancient and medieval science which I attended at the same time were models of clear exposition and of history of science at its best. A National Endowment for the Humanities SeminarThe Exact Sciences in Antiquitytaught at Yale by Asger Aaboe opened my eyes to pre-Greek mathematics and astronomy and gave me a wider scientific context in which to situate Greek science. My education in the interpretation of texts in ancient philosophy has been advanced by attending for the past twenty years the meetings of the West Coast Aristotelian Society led by Julius Moravcsik and, for almost as long, the meetings of the Southern California Readers of Ancient Philosophy. I have benefited greatly from the revolutionary work on Greek science done by G. E. R. Lloyd, who has set for me an example of what is possible in this field. I should like to thank him for his friendship and support, which have meant a great deal to me.

I offer my thanks to Professors A. A. Long, John Malcolm, Henry Mendell, Michael Wedin, and Mary Whitlock Blundell for their helpful comments on drafts of the book and for their encouragement. In addition, I am grateful to the students in my courses at Pomona College for their willingness to use the manuscript in lieu of a textbook and for their many valuable suggestions. Finally, I am deeply indebted to Paul Coppock for his generous editorial assistance and to Patricia Curd, who commented on more than one version of the manuscript as I was revising it for publication, and whose suggestions in many cases prompted significant alterations and, I believe, improvements.

Claremont, California

December 1993

Interest in the field of Presocratic studies had grown in the generation before the publication of the first edition of Philosophy Before Socrates in 1994, but in the past sixteen years it has expanded out of all recognition. Two series of international colloquia on specific Presocratic topics have taken place in Europe (beginning in 2000). Two conferences on individual Presocratic thinkers have been held in Latin America. The International Society for Presocratic Studies was founded. Books devoted to the Presocratic thinkers have appeared in standard series such as the

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary»

Look at similar books to Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary»

Discussion, reviews of the book Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.