Ferdinand von Schirach - Terror

Terror was first performed in London at the Lyric Hammersmith on 14 June 2017. The cast, in alphabetical order, was as follows:

Prosecuting Counsel Nelson Emma Fielding

Christian Lauterbach John Lightbody

Defence Counsel Biegler Forbes Masson

Presiding Judge Tanya Moodie

Franziska Meiser Shanaya Rafaat

Lars Koch Ashley Zhangazha

Directed by Sean Holmes

Set design by Anna Fleischle

Costume design by Loren Elstein

Lighting by Joshua Carr

Sound by Nick Manning

Presiding Judge

Lars Koch

Defendant

Biegler

Defence Counsel, male

Nelson

State Prosecutor, female

Christian Lauterbach

Franziska Meiser

Stenographer

female

Guard

male

The Presiding Judge enters. The curtain remains closed behind him. He is wearing a dark suit, a white shirt and a white tie. He is carrying his gown over one arm. He speaks directly to the audience.

Presiding Judge Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Im glad to see you all here on time. Its not easy parking round here and this building is a bit of a rabbit warren Anyway, its good that youve all managed to get here. Before we begin, I must ask you to forget everything that you have read or heard about this case. Yes, everything. It is you alone who have been called upon to judge this matter, you are the lay judges, the members of the public who today will sit in judgement on the defendant Lars Koch. The law grants you the power to determine the fate of a human being. Please take this responsibility seriously. You will judge solely what you hear in this courtroom. We lawyers describe this as evidence gained from within the hearing itself. That means: only what is said by the defendant, the witnesses, the joint plaintiffs and legal experts in this courtroom, only the evidence which we gather here may provide the basis for your verdict. At the end of the trial you will be obliged to vote, and I shall announce the verdict that you have reached.

In court proceedings we re-enact the events: the court is a stage. Of course were not going to perform a play, were not actors. We will be re-enacting the events through language, this is our way of understanding them. And its one that has stood the test of time. Hundreds of years ago the judges used to meet in a special place, one which was considered sacred, the thing. In those days to pronounce judgement meant to resolve disorder and restore order once again. Whenever harm was done an attack by an enemy tribe for example this was always the place where it would be discussed. Which woman was raped in the attack? Which hut was burnt to the ground? Which man was murdered? Our ancestors knew that in this way evil can lose its horror. Will we achieve that today? Im not sure. But we have to try. A judge does not regard anything as evil. His or her verdicts are not hell and damnation but acquittal, prison or preventive detention.

So make your judgement calmly and in your own time. And above all: remember that before you there is a human being, someone who has the same dreams as you, the same needs. He too, just like you, is trying to find happiness. And thats why in your judgement you should retain your own humanity.

Now, Id like to begin, but were still waiting for the Counsel for the Defence hes late.

The Guard approaches the Presiding Judge from the rear, says something to him quietly. The Presiding Judge nods. The Guard exits once again.

Ive just been told hes finally arrived. So, let us begin.

The Presiding Judge exits, putting on his gown as he walks.

A courtroom. In the centre the judges desk, with a Stenographer sitting on its right. The chair for the Presiding Judge is empty. To the left, beneath a window, sits the State Prosecutor with the joint plaintiff to her side and a little further back. The Counsel for the Defence is on the right. The Defendant is seated in a cell behind the Defence Counsel. In the centre, in front of the judges desk, stand an empty chair and table for the witnesses.

The Guard sits on a stool next to the door. The State Prosecutor and the Stenographer wear black gowns, white blouses and white scarves. The Defendant has appeared in his Air Force uniform. The Guard wears the uniform of court officials for the state of Berlin. The Defence Counsel is not wearing a gown. The Presiding Judge enters the courtroom through a narrow door behind the judges desk. At this point everyone on stage stands up.

Presiding Judge (standing) I declare this session of 16th division of the Criminal Court open. Please be seated.

The Presiding Judge sits down, followed by all the others. He waits until it is quiet.

For the record I confirm that the prosecution is represented by the State Prosecutor Ms Nelson, and Mr Biegler appears as Counsel for the Defence.

The defendant Major Lars Koch has been delivered here from custody. The court has therefore been assembled with all those present who were listed in the notice to appear. So far so good. Are there any questions or motions?

The State Prosecutor and Defence Counsel shake their heads.

Defence Counsel I would like Mr Koch to sit here next to me.

Presiding Judge Yes, I dont think hes a risk to anyones safety.

He turns to the Guard.

Sergeant, would you please

The Guard opens the cell door. The Defendant emerges and sits down next to the Defence Counsel.

(To the Defendant.) Good morning, Mr Koch. I will now take your personal details. Your first name please?

Defendant Lars.

Presiding Judge And your date of birth?

Defendant 14th March 1982. Im thirty-one years old.

Presiding Judge Are you married?

Defendant Yes.

Presiding Judge Do you have any children from or outside of this marriage?

Defendant One son, Boris. Hes two. No other children.

Presiding Judge And you live in Berlin?

Defendant Amselweg 56 in Steglitz.

Presiding Judge Mr Koch, you are a Major in the Air Force. You are currently being held in custody and have been relieved of your duties. Is that correct?

Defence Counsel My clients employer, the Air Force, is waiting for the outcome of this trial before deciding on his future.

Presiding Judge Thank you.

(To the Stenographer.) Personal details are the same as on page 159, Volume 1 of the main files.

The Stenographer writes down the personal details.

Does the court have any more questions about the defendants personal details?

The State Prosecutor and Defence Counsel both shake their heads.

Fine. If there are no further motions or questions I would ask the prosecution to read out the charge.