Raitt Fiona - The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law
Here you can read online Raitt Fiona - The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Taylor & Francis Group, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law
- Author:
- Publisher:Taylor & Francis Group
- Genre:
- Year:2011
- Rating:5 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Raitt Fiona: author's other books
Who wrote The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Psychology and Law
The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law brings an innovative, feminist analysis to these affiliated fields. Fiona E. Raitt and M. Suzanne Zeedyk explore the role of psychological syndromes (i.e. Battered Womans Syndrome, Rape Trauma Syndrome, Premenstrual Syndrome and False Memory Syndrome) within the courtrooms of the UK and the US. In addition to the explicit relationship between the two fields, they argue that there is an unrecognised implicit relation existing within the intersection of psychology and law, which they find works to the disadvantage of women.
Both novel and controversial, and written in a highly accessible style, The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law will engage readers from a wide range of disciplines including: psychology, law, critical theory, criminology and womens studies.
Fiona E. Raitt is a solicitor and a senior lecturer in law. M. Suzanne Zeedyk is a lecturer in psychology and co-editor of the Journal of Reproductive and InfantPsychology. Both are at the University of Dundee.
First published 2000 by Routledge
11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE
http://www.psypress.co.uk
Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada
by Taylor & Francis Inc
325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group
This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001.
2000 Fiona E. Raitt and M. Suzanne Zeedyk
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Raitt, Fiona E.
The implicit relation of psychology and law : women and syndrome evidence / Fiona E. Raitt and M. Suzanne Zeedyk.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. LawPsychological aspects. 2. WomenPsychology. 3. Women-Legal status, laws, etc. I. Zeedyk, M. Suzanne (Mary Suzanne), 1963- II. Title.
K346. R35 2000
340'.19-dc21 00-028088
ISBN 0-415-14782-4 (hbk)
ISBN 0-415-14783-2 (pbk)
ISBN 0-203-13193-2 Master e-book ISBN
ISBN 0-203-17912-9 (Glassbook Format)
To
Elizabeth Craig Morrin
who shared with me her extraordinary sense of
justice and lived her life by example
Winifred Gene Zeedyk
who, by believing in her boundaries, allowed me to
break free of my own
Jan Stephens
who has nourished in me and so many others the
courage to speak our truths
American Law Reports Annotated 2nd Series (1960) 74 ALR 2d [and Supplement]
Arcoren v United States 929 F 2d 1235, 1242, 8th Circuit (1991)
B v R (1993) 110 ALR (High Court of Australia)
Black v Ruxton 1998 SCCR 440
Brown v Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)
Chorlton v Lings (1868) LR 4 CP 374
Crockett v Cohen (1969) 299 F Suppl 739 (WD Va)
Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc 113 S Ct 2786 (1993); 125 L Ed 2d 469 (1993)
Delia S v Torres 134 Cal App 3d 471 (1982)
Dodson v State 24 Tex App 514 6 SW 548 (1887)
DPP v Morgan [1975] 2 All ER 347
Folkes v Chadd [1782] 3 Doug KB 157
Frost v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [1997] 1 All ER 540
Frye v United States 293 F 1013, 54 App DC 46 (DC Cir 1923)
General Electric Co et al. v Joiner 118 S Ct 512 (1997)
Gier v Educational Service Unit 66 F 3d 940 (1995)
Gillespie v State 49 Tex Crim 530 93 SW 556 (1906)
Henson v State 535 ND2d 1189 (1989)
Hobson [1998] 1 Cr App Rep 31
Ibn-Tamas v United States 407 A2d 626, 1979 DC Court of Appeals
Ibn-Tamas v United States 455 A2d 893, 1983 DC Court of Appeals
In re H (1983) Unreported, Lexis, Enggen library, Cases file.
Isley v Capuchin Province et al. 878 F Supp 1021 (1995)
Jamieson v HMA 1994 JC 88
Jex-Blake and Others v The Senatus Academicus of the University of Edinburgh 1873 SC 784
Lovato v Irvin (1983) 31 BR, 251 Bankruptcy
Maguire and others [1992] 94 Crim App R 133
Meek v HMA 1983 SLT 280
Palmer v R [1971] 55 Crim App R 223
People v Bledsoe 36 Cal 3d 236, 203 Cal Rptr 450 (1984)
People v Reid 475 NYS 2d 741 (1984)
People v Santos 1 K04 6229 (NYC Criminal Court, Kings County) (1982)
Price Waterhouse v Hopkins 490 US 228 (Supreme Court) (1989)
Processed Plastic v Warner Communications 675 F2d 852 (7th Cir1982)
R v Ahluwalia [1992] 4 All ER 889
R v B [1996] Crim LR 406
R v Beer [1985] Unreported, Court of Appeal, Lexis transcript, 15 October 1985
R v Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45
R v Byrne [1960] 3 All ER 1
R v CICB ex parte Webb [1987] QB 74
R v Craddock (1981) CLY Para 476
R v English (1982) Unreported, Norwich Crown Court, 10 November 1981
R v Henry and Manning [1969] 53 Cr App R 150
R v Humphreys [1995] 4 All ER 1008
R v Jenkins [1998] Crim LR 411
R v Lavallee [1990] 1 SCR 852
R v Mills [1997] AJ No 891; [1997] AJ No 1036; [1999] 180 DLR (4th) 1
R v Morhall [1995] 3 All ER 659
R v Morris [1988] 9 Cr App R (S) 528
R v NR [1997] OJ No 80
R v R [1991] 4 All ER 481
R v Reynolds [1988] Crim LR 679
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ejon [1997] Unreported, Queens
Bench decision, Lexis transcript, 9 October 1997
R v Smith [1982] Crim LR 531
R v T [1990] Crim LR 256
R v Thornton [1992] 1 All ER 306
R v Thornton [1996] 2 All ER 1023
R v Turner [1975] QB 834
Ramona v The Superior Court of Los Angeles County 57 Cal App 4th 107 (1997)
Ratliff v State Tex Crim 60 SW 666 (1901)
Reid v Florida Real Estate Commission 188 So2d 846 (Fla Dis Ct App) (1966)
Rutherford v HMA 1997 SCCR 711
Saliba v State 475 NE2d 1181 (1985)
Scott v Hamilton 1988 SCCR 262
Stallard v HMA 1989 SCCR 248
State v Clark 27 Idaho 48 146 P 1107 (1915)
State v Hines 696 A2d 780 (NJ 1997)
State v Jackson NM 641 P2d 498 (1982)
State v Kellar
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law»
Look at similar books to The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.