• Complain

David Robert Grimes - Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World

Here you can read online David Robert Grimes - Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Experiment, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Experiment
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Good Thinking is our best defense against anti-vaccine paranoia, climate denial, and other dire threats of today In our ever-more-polarized society, theres at least one thing we still agree on: The world is overrun with misinformation, faulty logic, and the gullible followers who buy into it all. Of course, were not among them--are we? Scientist David Robert Grimes is on a mission to expose the logical fallacies and cognitive biases that drive our discourse on a dizzying array of topics-from vaccination to abortion, 9/11 conspiracy theories to dictatorial doublespeak, astrology to alternative medicine, and wrongful convictions to racism. But his purpose in Good Thinking isnt to shame or place blame. Rather, its to interrogate our own assumptions-to develop our eye for the glimmer of truth in a vast sea of dubious sources-in short, to think critically. Grimess expert takedown of irrationality is required reading for anyone wondering why bad thinking persists and how we can defeat it. Ultimately, no one changes anyone elses mind; we can only change our own-and give others the tools to do the same.

David Robert Grimes: author's other books


Who wrote Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide
Page List
ACCLAIM FOR Good Thinking From anti-vaxxers to DunningKruger from - photo 1

ACCLAIM FOR

Good Thinking

Picture 2

From anti-vaxxers to DunningKruger, from homeopathy and astrology to false balance (what I call the BBC Fallacy), from misused statistics to nuclear brinkmanship, our irrationality could be our undoing. A book exposing the irrational ape and teaching us to mend our ways might so easily have become all preachy and teachy. Instead, such is David Robert Grimess storytelling skill, his book is an unstoppable page-turner. If our leaders were forced to read this book, the world would be a safer place.

Richard Dawkins

A beautifully reasoned book about our own unreasonableness.

Robin Ince

Grimess book addresses an all-too-urgent contemporary political question: How do we protect our societies and ourselves from charlatans and fools?... It brings a fresh perspective, and has been painstakingly researched. This spirited cocktail of data leavened with anecdotes is served up in Grimess trademark provocative, combative style... a highly creditable debut from a skilled communicator.

John Gibbons, The Irish Times

G ood T hinking Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking - photo 3

G ood T hinking Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking - photo 4

G ood T hinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World

Copyright 2019 by David Robert Grimes

Originally published in the UK as The Irrational Ape by Simon & Schuster UK in 2019. First published in North America in revised form by The Experiment, LLC, in 2021.

All rights reserved. Except for brief passages quoted in newspaper, magazine, radio, television, or online reviews, no portion of this book may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

The Experiment, LLC

220 East 23rd Street, Suite 600

New York, NY 10010-4658

theexperimentpublishing.com

THE EXPERIMENT and its colophon are registered trademarks of The Experiment, LLC. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book and The Experiment was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been capitalized.

The Experiments books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk for premiums and sales promotions as well as for fund-raising or educational use. For details, contact us at info@theexperimentpublishing.com .

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available upon request

eISBN: 978-1-61519-794-1

Cover design by Beth Bugler

Text design by M Rules

Author photograph by Abe Neihum

To Mathilde, Danny, and Laura
for the inspiration, the ideas,
and the encouragement

Contents
Preface

When future historians come to chronicle the early 21st century, one curious paradox may epitomize the era in which we now live. The advent of the internet in the final decade of the 20th century promised the entire repository of the worlds information at our very fingertips, and a new dawn of mutual understanding that would transcend the confines of geography or politics. Fewer sages foresaw, however, that the same technology would enable the propagation of falsehood at staggering velocity to huge, receptive audiences. Fewer still predicted this would leave us more polarized and divided than ever before. The upheaval and division that define our current epoch will no doubt intrigue those future historians. Navigating our way now, without the benefit of hindsight, is an abiding challenge. With such a confluence of contradictory aspects, it is small wonder were frequently left feeling overwhelmed, and an ostensible old Chinese curse is frequently recited: May you live in interesting times.

Fittingly perhaps in this age of disinformation, this invocation is apocryphalthere is no such idiom in Chinese. Its a benign misconception, but the unsettling reality is that many of the delusions we harbor can cause us serious harm. As I write this in late 2020, we are in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis. In this first pandemic of the information age, weve witnessed the emergence of a shadow plague: an infodemic, where facts, half-truths, and outright fabrications haphazardly entangle, virulently spreading as much as the pathogen that created the havoc in the first place. In a vacuum of uncertainty, rumors and myths move aggressively to fill the void. In the sound and fury, we have seen a dark renaissance of conspiracy theory, propaganda, and disinformation exert a worrying influenceabout 30 percent of the US population, for example, believe COVID-19 to be a hoax or deliberately engineered, despite the ample evidence to the contrary.

Inevitably perhaps, these bogus claims have become serious impediments to societal cohesion and collective well-being. Something as simple as face masks have become politicized. Around the world, protests against their apparent imposition have become a unifying flashpoint for something more fundamental: a focal point of contention. Beyond this superficial edifice lies a litany of conspiracy theoriesthat the virus is a hoax, or caused by 5G, or is an odious plot by Bill Gates and some sinister cabal. The astute observer too would notice the heavy involvement of the anti-vaccine community, alternative health advocates, and even supporters of QAnon, the outlandish far-right conspiracy theory that insists a secret organization of Satan-worshipping pedophiles runs the world. The stark reality is that the enduring legacy of the COVID era may not be solely the pandemic but a dawning awareness of quite how susceptible we are to poisonous fictions.

It is vital to note, though, that this was a problem long before we all began to become more aware of it with the furor over COVID. When the first edition of this book was released in Europe in late 2019 as The Irrational Ape, coronavirus was not a household term. Even then, the book was replete with myriad stories of how and why we get things wrong, which resonate all the louder thanks to our recent history. Some of the problems we face are age-old: Our psychological quirks make us perennially vulnerable to emotive and incendiary fictions. We remain dangerously pliable to manipulation, a fact that has not gone unnoticed by malicious actors in arenas from politics to medicine. Our self-curation of modern media has led us to deeper divisions and mutual hostility than ever, and we are easily misled by the misrepresentation of everything from logic to statistics.

When the book was released in Europe, the subject was undoubtedly timely. And as the truly staggering events of the last year make clear, the topics explored within have only increased in urgency and importance. The motivation behind this book is to explain why we go so badly askew with our reasoning, and how we can steel ourselves against these frequently damaging missteps. Understanding why we err is critical if were to circumvent the worst consequences of unclear thinking: Unless we are acutely aware of where we go wrong, we can easily blunder into mistakes that cause us real harm. Critical thinking is the only shield we have against the machinations and ineptitude of charlatans, fools, and demagogues. Our real challenge now and in the future is not accessing information, but rather learning how to critically evaluate the deluge of claims to which were subjected.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World»

Look at similar books to Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World»

Discussion, reviews of the book Good Thinking: Why Flawed Logic Puts Us All at Risk and How Critical Thinking Can Save the World and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.