• Complain

Reinhold Martin - Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University

Here you can read online Reinhold Martin - Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2021, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Reinhold Martin Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University
  • Book:
    Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Columbia University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

What do the technical practices, procedures, and systems that have shaped institutions of higher learning in the United States, from the Ivy League and womens colleges to historically black colleges and land-grant universities, teach us about the production and distribution of knowledge? Addressing media theory, architectural history, and the history of academia, Knowledge Worlds reconceives the university as a media complex comprising a network of infrastructures and operations through which knowledge is made, conveyed, and withheld.Reinhold Martin argues that the material infrastructures of the modern universitythe architecture of academic buildings, the configuration of seminar tables, the organization of campus plansreveal the ways in which knowledge is created and reproduced in different kinds of institutions. He reconstructs changes in aesthetic strategies, pedagogical techniques, and political economy to show how the boundaries that govern higher education have shifted over the past two centuries. From colleges chartered as rights-bearing corporations to research universities conceived as knowledge factories, educating some has always depended upon excluding others. Knowledge Worlds shows how the division of intellectual labor was redrawn as new students entered, expertise circulated, science repurposed old myths, and humanists cultivated new forms of social and intellectual capital. Combining histories of architecture, technology, knowledge, and institutions into a critical media history, Martin traces the uneven movement in the academy from liberal to neoliberal reason.

Reinhold Martin: author's other books


Who wrote Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents
Knowledge Worlds Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 - photo 1
Knowledge Worlds
Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester West - photo 2
Picture 3
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2021 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-54857-1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Martin, Reinhold, 1964 author.
Title: Knowledge worlds: media, materiality, and the making of the modern
university / Reinhold Martin.
Description: New York City: Columbia University Press, 2021. |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2020028433 (print) | LCCN 2020028434 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780231189828 (hardback) | ISBN 9780231189835 (trade paperback) |
ISBN 9780231548571 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Education, HigherPhilosophy. |
Classification: LCC LB2322.2 .M3677 2021 (print) | LCC LB2322.2 (ebook) |
DDC 378.001dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020028433
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020028434
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
Cover image: William Hallock and Charles F. McKim, Illumination of main
reading room, Low Memorial Library, Columbia University, c. 1897.
Plan Showing Position of Lamps, Dome, and Globe. From Hallock,
Diffused Illumination, Progressive Age 16, no. 3 (1 March 1 1898): 109.
For Neelan, and in memory of Reinhold Ilmar Martin
(Baltic University, 19461949)
Picture 4
CONTENTS
H ow to understand the long, recursive passage in university discourse from liberal to neoliberal reason? Within what material infrastructures, what ways of organizing space and time, regulated by what representations, what poetics, have systems of academic knowledge formed? To what regimes of power, what dialectics of mastery and subordination, what distributions of value, do these infrastructures belong? By what symbolic and political economy of media, technics, and intellectual life, in short, has the modern university been governed?
Animated by such questions, this book opens in several directions. The first, signaled in the subtitle, puts the accent on media. This identifies Knowledge Worlds as a contribution to the history of infrastructural media, or media complexes, with the modern university as its central object. Over the decade or so during which I have researched and written the book, I have conceived of it primarily in these terms, and I still do. Media, broadly construed, take center stage as social and technological systems. Writing from in-between fixed topoi like academic disciplines, institutions, and their guiding concepts, I have tried to show how specific media complexes have enabled, constrained, and otherwise defined the freedom to know, the freedom to learn, and the freedom to teach.
A second reading places the accent slightly differently, on university, as in the making of the modern university. This locates the book among works of intellectual and institutional history and in the history of higher education, especially those that have taken universities or particular aspects of universities or colleges as their subject matter. Many of the books that have filled my shelves during this time belong to these areas, and I have frequently relied on the foundations these works have laid. I hope that this book will take its place among them, if only (in some cases) as a rejoinder.
A third reading concerns what is modern about universities and the media by which they are shaped. A provincialism masked in the subtitlethe modern universityis that the colleges and universities that Knowledge Worlds considers are all located in the United States, and most of the hardware that constitutes their media complexes is American-made. This might lend credence to the metonymic fallacy that allows America (or Euro-America) and all things American (or Western) to stand for modernity as such.
My hypothesis instead is that the hegemonic microcosm I study herethe American universityrefracts the variegated macrocosm, which includes its counterparts around the world. Putting U.S. colleges and universities under the microscope highlights the boundary problems that have defined them, the recurrent efforts to make worlds inside their walls distinct from those outside even while connecting the two. For what is modern about colleges and universities in the United States from about 1800 to about 1975 is so by virtue of the particular ways in which their numerous gates, passages, and thresholdsboth spatial and temporalhave secured knowledge, consolidated power, and laid claim on universality through the regular, carefully orchestrated opening and closing of doors.
Lurking within these readings of the book is the difference between a university and a college, each of which generally serves different constituents to different ends. Rather than accept this difference as categorical, I have tried to show it in formation. In the United States, colleges most often preceded universities and sometimes grew into them. But the transformation of one into the other was rarely straightforward, just as the persistence of some traits and the introduction of others rarely followed a predictable path. In all cases, my main concern has been the line that distinguishes and joins the two, diachronically and synchronically. Whether it is a history of media or of universities, then, this book is a history of differences, inequalities, connections, and continuities in the production, storage, and transmission of knowledge.
Finally, there is the matter of the subjects who make this history even as they are made by it. Throughout I emphasize the making, which like all construction requires tools. From books to buildings, material things mediate countless acts of knowledge-making thatin each caserecursively define their makers. Knowledge Worlds is about these human agents and their degrees of agency, just as much as it is about the hardware that enables them to know, and to be recognized in turn as knowing subjects who operate that hardware.
For a book like this, the authors disciplinary orientation should be especially consequential. Mine begins with the history of architecture. Despite its institutional location in schools of architecture and in departments of art history, the history of architectureor architectural historyis, as I conceive it, of a piece with historical scholarship in general, not a separate domain. Media history is a history of such connections. Still, the architectural historian brings certain tools to the job site. Time spent walking around campuses, poking around their buildings, and examining visual documents has been especially important. Unmentioned in the title, architecture is everywhere in the book. Yet what I have written about is frequently unseen: the infrastructures that pass through more visible or legible structures. Historians of architecture may therefore find some expectations of their craft unmet. My hope nonetheless is that a patient reading will show how doing history with architecture reanimates the languages of space, form, utility, and meaning that have been refined by generations of scholars to whom I am silently indebted.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University»

Look at similar books to Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University»

Discussion, reviews of the book Knowledge Worlds: Media, Materiality, and the Making of the Modern University and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.