• Complain

Menelaos Christopoulos - Myth and History: Close Encounters

Here you can read online Menelaos Christopoulos - Myth and History: Close Encounters full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2022, publisher: de Gruyter, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

Myth and History: Close Encounters: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Myth and History: Close Encounters" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The present volume tackles the twin subject of myth and history, engages into discussions of the emerging interactions between the two spheres, and highlights the concomitant intricate contexts of reference. Thus, it contributes to the study of a su

Menelaos Christopoulos: author's other books


Who wrote Myth and History: Close Encounters? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Myth and History: Close Encounters — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Myth and History: Close Encounters" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
MythosEikonPoiesis Edited by Anton Bierl Gregory Nagy Richard Martin Volume - photo 1

MythosEikonPoiesis

Edited by

Anton Bierl
Gregory Nagy
Richard Martin

Volume

ISBN 9783110779585

e-ISBN (PDF) 9783110780116

e-ISBN (EPUB) 9783110780239

Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek

The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.

2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Part I: Epos
Historicizing Homers Myth in the Homeric Epigrams
Menelaos Christopoulos
Abstract

In this contribution I focus on some particular aspects of the Homeric Epigrams related to the poetical persona of Homer. By reading the Epigrams one can easily see the care taken by the author of the pseudo-Herodotean Life of Homer (in which the Epigrams are included) to give a persuasive association between the poems themselves and the particular circumstances of Homers life in which they are supposed to have been composed. As the Homeric Epigrams are falsely ascribed to Homer, what they actually do in the history of classical literature is borrow the impact of the greatest Greek poet and in exchange supply their supposed creator with the biographic historical evidence which he lacks.

This contribution advances some thoughts concerning the Homeric Epigrams, a group of short epic poems which have been falsely attributed to Homer and are supposed to depict particular moments of his life. The whole corpus of these poems is preserved in a Life of Homer, a text dated approximately between the first and the second centuries CE, at least eight centuries later than the historical period in which Homer may have lived; In this chapter I will try to focus on some particular aspects of the Epigrams which better illustrate their supposed relationship with the poetical persona of Homer, who is more often perceived as a mythical figure rather than a historical one.

It should be first recalled that the pseudo-Herodotean Life of Homer narrates the birth, the growing up, the coming of age and the many wanderings of the boy who was born in Smyrna by the river Meles and who was for that reason first named Melesigenes; later, once he was definitely blinded, he was given the name Homer (), as the inhabitants of Cuma (), where he later resided, used to call blind people. According to the Lives narrative, before being struck by blindness, Homer visited Etruria, Spain and mainly Ithaca, where he familiarized himself with the local tradition on Odysseus; when he definitely lost his eyesight, he left Smyrna, where he had already earned a great reputation as a poet, and visited Teichos, Cuma, Phocaea, Erythraea and Chios where he settled, got married and begot two daughters. He then decided to visit the mainland of Greece. He first moved to Samos, then to Ios, hoping to sail from there to the Greek mainland and in particular to Athens; but he never attained this target since he finally succumbed to the illness which was already keeping him in Ios; it is in this island where he was finally buried by the sea-side.

By reading the Epigrams one can easily see the care taken by the author of the Lives to give a persuasive relationship between the poems themselves and the particular circumstances of Homers adventures in which they are supposed to be composed. This involves also the main questions raised already in antiquity concerning Homers origin, birth and descent. On these precise questions some verses of the fourth Epigram give, perhaps, an interesting response:

.

, ,

, 5

.

, ,

, 10

.

.

, .

,

.

To what a fate did Zeus the Father give me a prey even

while he made me to grow, a babe at my mothers knee!

By the will of Zeus who holds the aegis

the people of Phricon, riders on wanton horses,

more active than raging fire in the test of war, 5

once built the towers of Aeolian Smyrna, wave-shaken neighbour to the sea,

through which glides the pleasant stream of sacred Meles;

thence arose the daughters of Zeus, glorious children,

and would fain have made famous that fair country and the city of its people.

But in their folly those men scorned the divine voice and renown of song, 10

and in trouble shall one of them remember this hereafter,

he who with scornful words to them contrived my fate.

Yet I will endure the lot which heaven gave me even at my birth,

bearing my disappointment with a patient heart.

My dear limbs yearn not to stay in the sacred streets of Cyme, 15

but rather my great heart urges me

to go unto another country, small though I am.

According to the pseudo-Herodotean Life, this fourth Epigram was composed in Cuma, where Homer, still named Melisigenes, moved to, hoping to find in this city what he had not found in his birthplace Smyrna: a place to live, to practise his art and to earn his living. And, indeed, as soon as he arrived there, his poetry immediately earned the profound admiration of its listeners. What the poet wished and what the inhabitants asked from the authorities Council, was to keep Homer there for ever at the citys expense. By offering the wandering artist a home, the city would take advantage of his increasing artistic reputation. But when the issue came to the Assembly, an influential member of the Council strongly objected by arguing that if such petitions were encouraged, the city would soon become full of useless homers ( ) and the claim was refused. The bitter reception of the news by Homer is reflected in the lines 817 and what the Epigram only implies is a very interesting story. According to this story, when the Aeolian Cuma was founded, a young man from Magnesia, Melanopos, moved there, got married and begot a daughter named Cretheis. After her parents death, Cretheis remained under the tutorship of Cleanax, a trusted friend of her father. In spite of Cleanax thoughtful surveillance, Cretheis got pregnant by a young man whose identity remained unknown; Cleanax sent her to Smyrna, in the house of Ismenias, a friend of his, and it is in Smyrna that Critheis gave birth to her baby, Melesigenes, named, as mentioned, after the river Meles where the birth took place. Cretheis then married Phemios, a teacher of letters and music, who took excellent care of Melesigenes inherent talent. After the death of Phemios and, later on of Critheis, Melesigenes, alias Homer, became himself a renowned poet and teacher. This is, briefly, the story told about Homers mother, Cretheis.

The refusal of the inhabitants of Cuma to accept Homer as the citys guest could indeed be associated with a wider issue concerning social attitude towards poets. According to M. Lefkowitz,

In the fourth Epigram the idea of the mother advanced in the first two verses leads to the idea of motherland, a frequent association which, however, becomes particularly significant in the case of Homer. In contrast to the usual epic and Homeric convention according to which a person is introduced into the narrative through the mention of his paternal descent (patronymic), the origin of Homer is traditionally defined through maternal descent (metronymic); what is more, the identity of his father in the relevant traditions is either on the other hand is one of the most unusual ones in that it suggests that Homer is the result of his mothers rape by her uncle who, afterwards, married her to Phemios. However strange this version may be, it is once more stressing the maternal descent in Homers genealogical tree.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Myth and History: Close Encounters»

Look at similar books to Myth and History: Close Encounters. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Myth and History: Close Encounters»

Discussion, reviews of the book Myth and History: Close Encounters and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.