• Complain

Scientific American - The Science of Education: Back to School

Here you can read online Scientific American - The Science of Education: Back to School full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Scientific American, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Scientific American The Science of Education: Back to School
  • Book:
    The Science of Education: Back to School
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Scientific American
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Science of Education: Back to School: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Science of Education: Back to School" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Science of Education: Back to School by the Editors of Scientific AmericanUpdated Edition. This eBook has been updated to include content from two special reports on education. Scientific Americans popular Learning in the Digital Age, is included almost in its entirety as the new Section 7 and analyzes the positive and negative effects of the digital revolution on education. In addition, two new articles from Scientific American Minds report The Science of Better Learning are included in Section 2: For the Love of Math and The Science of Handwriting. The first examines the benefits of guided-discovery programs like JUMP in teaching math, and the second discusses research that shows forming words by hand rather than typing may lead to longer-term memories. These and the rest of the articles in this collection explore how learning is a scientific process and offer the latest theories of education. Section 1, The Lesson Plan, begins with how children learn and includes an eye-opening piece by Scientific American Editor Ingrid Wickelgren on how honing certain psychological skills not only enhances learning but also helps kids fight frustration and ward off stress. Other sections cover teaching the three Rs, the unique requirements of gifted children, controversies of class size, roles of parents and teachers and the imperative to improve science teaching. Individual articles delve into specific issues such as how a focus on intellect over effort can negatively affect potential, the role that errors play in retention, how physical activity boosts academic achievement, the effects of parents versus peer groups on behavior and much more. In this anthology, Scientific American has gathered some of its best reporting on the challenges, successes and the execution of a scientific approach to education. Together, they help construct a path for success for the next generation.

Scientific American: author's other books


Who wrote The Science of Education: Back to School? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Science of Education: Back to School — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Science of Education: Back to School" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Science of Education Back to School From the Editors of Scientific - photo 1

The Science of Education

Back to School


From the Editors of Scientific American
Cover image: PeopleImages/Getty Images
Published by Scientific American
One New York Plaza
Suite 4500
New York, NY 10004-1562
www.scientificamerican.com
Copyright 2017 Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc.
Scientific American is a registered trademark of Nature America, Inc.
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-466824140

THE SCIENCE OF EDUCATION Back to School From the Editors of Scientific - photo 2


THE SCIENCE OF EDUCATION Back to School From the Editors of Scientific - photo 3


THE SCIENCE OF EDUCATION


Back to School


From the Editors of Scientific American

Table of Contents

Introduction
by Robert Keating
Section 1
1.1
by Gary Stix
1.2
by Carol S. Dweck
1.3
by Ingrid Wickelgren
1.4
by David C. Geary
1.5
by Henry L. Roediger III and Bridgid Finn
1.6
by Clancy Blair
Section 2
2.1
Interview by Gareth Cook
2.2
by Keith Rayner, Barbara R. Foorman, Charles A. Perfetti, David Pesetsky and Mark S. Seidenberg
2.3
by Rodger Doyle
2.4
by Diane F. Halpern, Camilla P. Benbow, David C. Geary, Ruben C. Gur, Janet Shibley Hyde and Morton Ann Gernsbacher
2.5
by John Mighton
2.6
by Brandon Keim
Section 3
3.1
by Ellen Winner
3.2
by Christian Fischer
3.3
by Steve Ayan
3.4
by Marie-Nolle Ganry-Tardy
Section 4
4.1
by Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Dominic J. Brewer, Adam Gamoran and J. Douglas Willms
4.2
by Paul Tullis
Section 5
5.1
by the Editors
5.2
Interview by Jonah Lehrer
5.3
by Pat Wingert
Section 6
6.1
by the Editors
6.2
by the Editors
6.3
by Randy McGinnis and Deborah Roberts-Harris
6.4
Interview by Brendan Borrell
Section 7
7.1
by the Editors
7.2
by Jeffrey Bartholet
7.3
by Salman Khan
7.4
by Pawan Agarwal
7.5
by Robert A. Lue
7.6
by Seth Fletcher
7.7
by Diane Ravitch
7.8
by Arne Duncan
7.9
by Jeffrey Bartholet

SECTION 1

The Lesson Plan

How to Build a Better Learner

By Gary Stix


Eight-month-old Lucas Kronmiller has just had the surface of his largely hairless head fitted with a cap of 128 electrodes. A research assistant in front of him is frantically blowing bubbles to entertain him. But Lucas seems calm and content. He has, after all, come here, to the Infancy Studies Laboratory at Rutgers University, repeatedly since he was just four months old, so today is nothing unusual. Helike more than 1,000 other youngsters over the past 15 yearsis helping April A. Benasich and her colleagues to find out whether, even at the earliest age, it is possible to ascertain if a child will go on to experience difficulties in language that will prove a burdensome handicap when first entering elementary school.

Benasich is one of a cadre of researchers employing brain-recording techniques to understand the essential processes that underlie learning. The new science of neuroeducation seeks the answers to questions that have always perplexed cognitive psychologists and pedagogues.

How, for instance, does a newborns ability to process sounds and images relate to the childs capacity to learn letters and words a few years later? What does a youngsters capacity for staying mentally focused in preschool mean for later academic success? What can educators do to foster childrens social skillsalso vital in the classroom? Such studies can complement the wealth of knowledge established by psychological and educational research programs.

They also promise to offer new ideas, grounded in brain science, for making better learners and for preparing babies and toddlers for reading, writing, arithmetic, and survival in the complex social network of nursery school and beyond. Much of this work focuses on the first years of life and the early grades of elementary school because some studies show that the brain is most able to change at that time.

THE AHA! INSTANT

Benasich studies anomalies in the way the brains of the youngest children perceive sound, a cognitive process fundamental to the understanding of language, which, in turn, forms the basis for reading and writing skills. The former nurse, who went on to earn two doctorates, focuses on what she calls the aha! instantan abrupt transition in electrical activity in the brain that signals that something new has been recognized.

Researchers at Benasichs lab in Newark, N.J., expose Lucas and other infants to tones of a certain frequency and duration. They then record a change in the electrical signals generated in the brain when a different frequency is played. Typically the electroencephalographic (EEG) trace peaks downward in response to the changeindicating that the brain essentially says, Yes, something has changed; a delay in the response time to the different tones means that the brain has not detected the new sound quickly enough. The research has found that this pattern of sluggish electrical activity at six months can predict language issues at three to five years of age. Differences in activity that persist during the toddler and preschool years can foretell problems in development of the brain circuitry that processes the rapid transitions occurring during perception of the basic units of speech. If children fail to hear or process components of speechsay, a da or a paquickly enough as toddlers, they may lag in sounding out written letters or syllables in their head, which could later impede fluency in reading. These recent findings offer more rigorous confirmation of other research by Benasich showing that children who encounter early problems in processing these sounds test poorly on psychological tests of language eight or nine years later.

If Benasich and others can diagnose future language problems in infants, they may be able to correct them by exploiting the inherent plasticity of the developing brainits capacity to change in response to new experiences. They may even be able to improve basic functioning for an infant whose brain is developing normally. The easiest time to make sure that the brain is getting set up in a way thats optimal for learning may be in the first part of the first year, she says.

Games, even in the crib, could be one answer. Benasich and her team have devised a game that trains a baby to react to a change in tone by turning the head or shifting the eyes (detected with a tracking sensor). When the movement occurs, a video snippet plays, a reward for good effort. In a preliminary study reported late last year, this brain training for babies, practiced over a period of weeks, enabled a group of 15 healthy infants to react more quickly to tones than a control group did. Benasich hopes that her research will confirm that the game might also assist infants impaired in processing these sounds to respond more quickly. She has started to confer with a toy developer interested in creating a mobile that could be placed on the side of a crib at home to train infants in perception of rapid sound sequences.

THE NUMBER SENSE

Flexing cognitive muscles early on may also help infants tune rudimentary math skills. Stanislas Dehaene, a neuroscientist at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, is a leader in the field of numerical cognition who has tried to develop ways to help children with early math difficulties. Babies have some capability of recognizing numbers from birth. When the skill is not in place from the beginning, Dehaene says, a child may later have difficulty with arithmetic and higher math. Interventions that build this number sense, as Dehaene calls it, may help the slow learner avoid years of difficulty in math class.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Science of Education: Back to School»

Look at similar books to The Science of Education: Back to School. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Science of Education: Back to School»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Science of Education: Back to School and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.