First published 2010 by Ashgate Publishing
Published 2016 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright Michael Giudice, Wil Waluchow and Maksymilian Del Mar 2010. For copyright of individual articles please refer to the Acknowledgements.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Wherever possible, these reprints are made from a copy of the original printing, but these can themselves be of very variable quality. Whilst the publisher has made every effort to ensure the quality of the reprint, some variability may inevitably remain.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data:
The methodology of legal theory. (The library of essays in contemporary legal theory)
1. Jurisprudence. 2. LawMethodology.
I. Series II. Giudice, Michael. III. Waluchow, Wilfrid J.
IV. Del Mar, Maksymilian, 1979
340.1dc22
Library of Congress Control Number: 2010924488
ISBN 9780754628903 (hbk)
The editor and publishers wish to thank the following for permission to use copyright material.
Cambridge University Press for the essays: Joseph Raz (1998), Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison, Legal Theory, , pp. 24982. Copyright 1998 Cambridge University Press; Gerald J. Postema (1998), Jurisprudence as Practical Philosophy, Legal Theory, , pp. 32957. Copyright 1998 Cambridge University Press; Julie Dickson (2004), Methodology in Jurisprudence: A Critical Survey, Legal Theory, , pp. 11756. Copyright 2004 Cambridge University Press; William Twining (2005), Have Concepts, Will Travel: Analytical Jurisprudence in a Global Context, International Journal of Law in Context, , pp. 540. Copyright 2005 Cambridge University Press.
Roger Cotterrell (2008), Transnational Communities and the Concept of Law, Ratio Juris, , pp. 118. Copyright 2008 Roger Cotterrell.
H. Patrick Glenn (2005), Doin the Transsystemic: Legal Systems and Legal Traditions, McGill Law Journal, , pp. 86398. Copyright 2005 H. Patrick Glenn.
Liam Murphy (2005), Concepts of Law, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, , pp. 119. Copyright 2005 Liam Murphy.
Oxford University Press for the essays: Leslie Green (2005), General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, , pp. 56580. Copyright 2005 Leslie Green; Ronald Dworkin (2004), Harts Postscript and the Character of Political Philosophy, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, , pp. 137. Copyright 2004 Oxford University Press; Brian Z. Tamanaha (2001), Socio-Legal Positivism and a General Jurisprudence, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, , pp. 132. Copyright 2001 Oxford University Press.
Springer for the essay: Michael Giudice, (2005), Ways of Understanding Diversity Among Theories of Law, Law and Philosophy, , pp. 50945. Copyright 2005 Springer.
University of Arkansas Press for the essay: Michael D. Bayles (1990), What is Jurisprudence About? Theories, Definitions, Concepts, or Conceptions of Law?, Philosophical Topics, , pp. 2340.
University of Notre Dame Law School for the essays: Brian Leiter (2003), Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence, American Journal of Jurisprudence, , pp. 1751; John Finnis (2003), Law and What I Truly Should Decide, American Journal of Jurisprudence, , pp. 10729.
University of Toronto Press for the essay: Keith Culver (2001), Leaving the Hart-Dworkin Debate, University of Toronto Law Journal, , pp. 36798.
University of Western Ontario for the essays: Andrew Halpin (2006), The Methodology of Jurisprudence: Thirty Years Off the Point, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, , pp. 67105; Danny Priel (2007), Jurisprudence and Necessity, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, , pp. 173200.
Every effort has been made to trace all the copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publishers will be pleased to make the necessary arrangement at the first opportunity.