Truth, Intentionality and Evidence
This book provides an anthropological exploration of the ways in which crime is perceived and defined, focusing on notions of truth, intentionality and evidence. The chapters contain rich ethnographic case studies drawn from work in the Middle East, Africa, India, Mexico and Europe. A variety of instances are discussed, from court proceedings, police reports and newspapers to moments of conflict resolution and reconciliation. Through analysis of this material, the authors reflect on how perception of an act as a crime can differ and how the definition of crime may not be shared by all societies. The approach takes into consideration local standards as well as social, legal and contextual constraints.
Yazid Ben Hounet is a research fellow in anthropology at the CNRS (Centre National de Recherche Scientifique / French National Research Center for Scientific Research). He is also a member of the Laboratoire dAnthropologie Sociale (CNRS/Collge de France/EHESS) and of the Centre Jacques Berque.
Deborah Puccio-Den is a researcher at the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), and she works at LAIOS-IIAC, a research laboratory of the EHESS (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales), France.
Routledge Studies in Anthropology
For a full list of titles in this series, please visit www.routledge.com
32Anthropology and Alterity
Edited by Bernhard Leistle
33Mixed Race Identities in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands
Edited by Farida Fozdar and Kirsten McGavin
34Freedom in Practice
Edited by Moises Lino e Silva and Huon Wardle
35Indian Classical Dance and the Making of Postcolonial National Identities
Dancing on Empires Stage
Sitara Thobani
36Meeting Ethnography
Meetings as Key Technologies of Contemporary Governance, Development, and Resistance
Edited by Jen Sandler and Renita Thedvall
37Toward an Anthropology of Ambient Sound
Edited by Christine Guillebaud
38On Knowing Humanity
Insights from Theology for Anthropology
Edited by Eloise Meneses and David Bronkema
39Everyday Faith in Sufi Senegal
Laura L. Cochrane
40Counterfeit Itineraries in the Global South
The Human Consequences of Piracy in China and Brazil
Rosana Pinheiro-Machado
41Truth, Intentionality and Evidence
Anthropological Approaches to Crime
Edited by Yazid Ben Hounet and Deborah Puccio-Den
Truth, Intentionality and Evidence
Anthropological Approaches to Crime
Edited by Yazid Ben Hounet and Deborah Puccio-Den
First published 2017
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
2017 selection and editorial matter, Yazid Ben Hounet and Deborah Puccio-Den; individual chapters, the contributors
The right of Yazid Ben Hounet and Deborah Puccio-Den to be identified as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book has been requested
ISBN: 978-1-138-64609-4 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-315-62774-8 (ebk)
Typeset in Sabon
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
This book comes out of a January 2015 workshop held at the Centre Jacques Berque (Rabat), with the support of the Wenner Gren Foundation and of the Laboratoire dAnthropologie Sociale (Paris).
Contents
BAUDOUIN DUPRET
YAZID BEN HOUNET AND DEBORAH PUCCIO-DEN
DANIELA BERTI AND GILLES TARABOUT
ARZOO OSANLOO
ZOUHAIR GHAZZAL
DEBORAH PUCCIO-DEN
YAZID BEN HOUNET
PERIG PITROU
BERTRAM TURNER
FABIEN PROVOST
LILIANE UMUBYEYI
Daniela Berti, Centre dEtudes Himalayennes, CNRS, France
Baudouin Dupret, cole des hautes tudes en sciences sociales, CNRS, France
Zouhair Ghazzal, Loyola University, Chicago, USA
Arzoo Osanloo, University of Washington, USA
Perig Pitrou, Laboratoire danthropologie sociale, CNRS, France
Fabien Provost, PhD candidate, LESC, France
Gilles Tarabout, Laboratoire dEthnologie et de Sociologie Comparative, CNRS, France
Bertram Turner, Max Planck Institut for Social Anthropology, Germany
Liliane Umubyeyi, Institut des sciences sociales du politique, ENS Cachan, France
In the introduction to the volume Law at Work (Dupret et al., 2015), four major themes are identified which help clarify the specific contributions of praxiology to the study of law. The first theme concerns the relationship between law in action and law on the books. Law as a social phenomenon cannot be reduced to legal codes (law on the books). However, it would be mistaken to ignore how formal statutes, case law and rules of evidence are integral to the practice of law. The Platonist idea that formally codified laws are mere appearances, and that the social scientists task is to uncover the reality lying behind such appearances, confounds analysis because it fails to take into account how formal law is taken up in practice. If we were to oppose theory to practice and legal provisions to living law, we would fail to understand fully the practical uses of law. A more adequate understanding can be gained through the close description of both professionals and laypersons orientations to, and reifications of, legal categories as they emerge from actual encounters in legal forums in the context of practical casework.
The second theme is related to the fact that in most sociolegal studies, scholars address the nature of law but ignore or presuppose the phenomenon of legal practice itself. The synthetic theories they deploy fail to resolve the production of legal practice. This has been called the missing what of sociolegal studies. This failure is not an omission so much as a concomitant of a pursuit of general models and assessments that aim to comprehend the fundamental significance of the law and to compare and critically examine legal institutions. As a result, they make little or no attempt to investigate the specific competencies through which lawyers collaboratively produce and coordinate legal actions in particular circumstances. It means that sociologists tend to describe various social influences on and implications of the growth and development of legal institutions while taking for granted that lawyers write briefs, present cases, interrogate witnesses, and engage in legal reasoning (Lynch, 1993, 114). Often, social science research devotes no attention to the here and now dimension of activity, and by so doing it obscures the necessarily situated character of such activity. To paraphrase Michael Moerman (1974: 68), sociolegal studies would do better to describe and analyze how legal categories are used rather than treating them as self-evident prescriptions and proscriptions for action.