Vaccine Epidemic
How Corporate Greed, Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health, and Our Children
Louise Kuo Habakus
Mary Holland
Center for Personal Rights, Inc., is a nonprofit organization founded to protect and advance personal rights, including the right to vaccination choice. Its cofounders and board of directors are Louise Kuo Habakus, Mary Holland, and Kim Mack Rosenberg. Mack Rosenberg and Ginger Taylor are contributing editors of this book.
Please Note: The essays in this book reflect the views of individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center for Personal Rights, Inc., (CPR) or Skyhorse Publishing, Inc., (Skyhorse). The authors bear sole responsibility for their essays. CPR and Skyhorse assume no liability for any actions you may take or omissions you may make as a result of reading this book.
Copyright 2011 by Center for Personal Rights, Inc.
All Rights Reserved. No part of this book maybe reproduced in any manner without the express written consent of the publisher, except in the case of brief excerpts in critical reviews or articles. All inquiries should be addressed to Skyhorse Publishing, 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018.
Skyhorse Publishing books may be purchased in bulk at special discounts for sales promotion, corporate gifts, fund-raising, or educational purposes. Special editions can also be created to specifications. For details, contact the Special Sales Department, Skyhorse Publishing, 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018 or info@skyhorsepublishing.com.
Skyhorse and Skyhorse Publishing are registered trademarks of Skyhorse Publishing, Inc. , a Delaware corporation.
www.skyhorsepublishing.com
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available on file.
9781616082727
Printed in the United States of America
T o all who are asking the questions
and all who are demanding the answers.
On rsiste linvasion des armes; on ne rsiste pas linvasion des ides. Greater than the tread of mighty armies is an idea whose time has come.
Victor-Marie Hugo, 1852, Histoire dun Crime French novelist, statesman, human rights activist
FOREWORD
Louise Kuo Habakus, MA, and Mary Holland, JD
V accination evokes strong opinions and emotions. Some are grateful and relieved to get vaccines. Others are angry and resentful about vaccination mandates. Many are caught in the middleafraid, confused, and looking for the straight scoop. If you want to understand the real issues in the vaccination debate, read this book. Whether you are a parent, student, employee, soldier, or anyone else, you have a stake in this debate. No matter who you are, sooner or later you will wonder,
Should I get a vaccine?
Do I have a choice?
Who decides?
The vaccination debate has two distinct viewpoints, one pro-vaccine and the other pro-choice. The camps usually hurl the same insults at one another, characterizing the other side as irresponsible, dangerous, denialist, corrupt, and antiscience. Although this book favors vaccination choice and explains why, we attempt to objectively outline each basic view by setting derogatory labels aside.
THE PRO-VACCINE CAMP
The pro-vaccine camp strongly supports U.S. vaccination policy. Two new books published in early 2011 advance this position: Paul Offits Deadly Choices and Seth Mnookins The Panic Virus. These books join Arthur Allens Vaccine , Susan Jacobys The Age of American Unreason, and Michael Specters Denialism in their critique of those who question vaccine safety. Here are their key arguments:
- Government officials are best qualified to make vaccination decisions . Only government can ensure that a sufficiently high percentage of people vaccinate to preserve societal herd immunity.
- Vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and effective , and the benefits vastly outweigh the risks. Adverse events are vanishingly rare.
- Science proves the benefit of vaccines beyond a reasonable doubt. The science is invaccines are not responsible for any increase in common childhood health problems, including autism. Theyre safe and effective.
- Vaccine refusers are dangerous and selfish . People who elect not to vaccinate are parasites. They are selfish, irrational, and threaten others with deadly disease.
- Only false prophets suggest that vaccines may cause disorders like autism . Quack healthcare practitioners concoct unfounded treatments for autism and prey on vulnerable parents desperate for help. People should disdain and shun them.
- Vaccine exemptions should be abolished . Dr. Offit and others suggest that states should abolish philosophical and religious exemptions. People abuse them and put others at risk. Because vaccines have been proven safe and effective, people have a social responsibility to vaccinate.
THE PRO-CHOICE CAMP
This book details the pro-vaccination choice perspective in law, religion, science, ethics, philosophy, and personal experience. Here are its key points:
- Vaccination choice is a human right. Because vaccination poses a risk to life, liberty, and security of person, only an individual or guardian may decide how, when, and whether to vaccinate.
- Society as a whole benefits from the cumulative impact of free and informed individual healthcare choices. The theory of herd immunity is not an adequate rationale for state compulsion to vaccinate.
- Vaccine safety science is flawed and incomplete . The Institute of Medicine as well as informed scientists, doctors, and officials have repeatedly acknowledged that fundamental questions about vaccine safety remain unanswered.
- The U.S. vaccine program is rife with conflicts of interest . Vaccines are big business and all of their promoterspharma, government, medicine, and scienceget their cut. The vaccine program does not put childrens safety first.
- Biomedical interventions are valid . Considerable science and anecdotal evidence support biomedical interventions for autism spectrum disorders and other chronic conditions. These interventions include diet, vitamin and mineral supplementation, chelation, and gastrointestinal treatment. Individuals are entitled to the practitioners and remedies of their choosing.
- Vaccination exemption rights must expand, not contract. Individuals have the right to free and informed consent for all medical interventions, including vaccination. In practice, not just in theory, individuals must have the right to make their own decisions.
As polarized as these camps are, we do share common ground. Both sides want a healthy, vibrant society. Both sides want responsible health policy grounded in ethics and science. Both sides see the vaccination issue as hugely important and seek to sway the public. Both sides are doing the work to understand each others analysis and arguments. Progress will not come from shadowboxing in our respective corners. It is now time for engagement and dialogue.
So, we invite the leaders of the pro-vaccine campin government, industry, and the professional medical associationsto publicly debate our different views. And, we invite the reader to read on.
Introduction
THE CASE FOR VACCINATION CHOICE
Louise Kuo Habakus, MA, and Mary Holland, JD
VACCINATION CHOICE IS A HUMAN RIGHT
V accine Epidemic addresses an issue of serious public concern for parents and all Americans. It builds the case that it is your rightnot the governmentsto decide whether to vaccinate yourself or your children. Only you, with your healthcare practitioner, can make the appropriate risk-benefit trade-off, and only you can be fully accountable for your choice, as with any other medical intervention.