• Complain

Michael Davis - Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science

Here you can read online Michael Davis - Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1988, publisher: SIU Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    SIU Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1988
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Through a close reading of Sophocles Ajax, Descartes Discourse on Method, and Platos Meno, Davis argues that ancient tragedy and modern science are alternative responses to the human longing for autonomy or striving to be a god.Tragic heroes assume that through politics they can exert more control over the world than the world will allow. To them the whole world is politics, or polis. Scientists seek to control by mastering nature, which, in essence, means to transform the whole of the world into a Polis. Thus the issues and motivations in modern science were already present in ancient tragedy.

Michael Davis: author's other books


Who wrote Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
title Ancient Tragedy and the Origins of Modern Science Philosophical - photo 1

title:Ancient Tragedy and the Origins of Modern Science Philosophical Explorations
author:Davis, Michael.
publisher:Southern Illinois University Press
isbn10 | asin:0809313901
print isbn13:9780809313907
ebook isbn13:9780585200545
language:English
subjectScience--History, Science--Philosophy, Sophocles.--Ajax, Descartes, Ren,--1596-1650.--Discours de la mthode, Plato.--Meno.
publication date:1988
lcc:Q124.6.D38 1988eb
ddc:190
subject:Science--History, Science--Philosophy, Sophocles.--Ajax, Descartes, Ren,--1596-1650.--Discours de la mthode, Plato.--Meno.
Page ii
PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS
A Series Edited by George Kimball Plochmann
Page iii
Ancient Tragedy and the Origins of Modern Science
by Michael Davis
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY PRESS
CARBONDALE AND EDWARDSVILLE
Page iv
Copyright 1988 by the Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
Designed by Bookworks, Inc.
Production supervised by Linda Jorgensen-Buhman
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Davis, Michael Peter, 1947
Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science / by Michael Peter
Davis.
p. cm. (Philosophical explorations)
Bibliography: p.
Includes index.
ISBN 0-8093-1390-1
1. ScienceHistory. 2. SciencePhilosophy. 3. Sophocles.
Ajax. 4. Descartes, Ren, 15961650. Discours de la mthode.
5. Plato. Meno. I. Title. II. Series.
Q124.6.D38 1988
190dc19 87-21275
CIP
Page v
for my parents
Page vii
Picture 2
I grow old always learning many things.
Count no man happy until he dies.
Solon
Page ix
Contents
Foreword
xi
Acknowledgments
xv
1
Introduction
1
2
Ancient Tragedy: Sophocles' Ajax
14
3
The Origin of Modern Science: Descartes' Discourse on Method I-III
34
4
The End of Modern Science: Descartes' Discourse on Method IV-VI
65
5
The Limit of Autonomy: Plato's Meno
98
6
Conclusion
153
Notes
161
Bibliography
169
Index
174

Page xi
Foreword
George Kimball Plochmann
This volume of modest size but very substantial import consists of commentaries on three diverse texts, with a Vorspiel on portions of a fourth. What are termed commentaries are, of course, efforts of many sorts, some being concerned partly if not almost wholly with questions of orthography, punctuation, families of manuscripts or editions and printings, and similar matters. (Whether these should be called commentaries in any primary and proper sense is something else to be considered.) A second kind is dedicated to supplying historical events thought relevant to the composition of the text, or anticipations of the text in previous authors or in the same author, or biographical backgrounds, the latter often verging upon detailed psychological analysis of the writer as a way of explaining his writings. Strictly speaking, these two types, valuable as they are, should be called adventitious, and they form a contrast with the third, which elucidates the meanings of terms, weighs the possible truth or falsity of statements, and judges the validity of the arguments, all through back-and-forth references to the composition as a whole, the nature of what is written about, its large structure, and its intent, declared or implied. If we take the first threeterms, statements, and argumentsas the materials of the text and the rest as contributing to its form, then striking a balance between the form and matter would seem to be the obligation laid upon commentators pursuing their task in this most comprehensive yet essential way.
An important text, being an individual thing, houses an infinite number of characteristics; there is no limit to the aspects, whether vital or incidental, that can be listed or at least queried about. The greater the originality of the text discussed, the greater the chance of its being sui generis and the larger the variety of true propositions assertible of its nature, its expressed thoughts; for its message falls into no readily identifiable species of human discourse with their conventions and parameters, however much its outward dress may
Page xii
be the samecomedy, summa, sonnet, or whatnot. Certainly each of the three chief texts treated by Professor Davis is one of a kind, if we account for both form and content, regardless of the fact that it is easy to list many relatives close enough in conventional structures to be called by the same names, tragic drama, semiautobiographical treatise, and dialogue. Preeminent in the author's discussions of these is his power to seek out and distinguish the unique messages of each of them and to show that following Aristotle in the theory of tragedy will carry one but part way into Sophocles'
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science»

Look at similar books to Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science»

Discussion, reviews of the book Ancient tragedy and the origins of modern science and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.