• Complain

Murray N. Rothbard - Economic Controversies

Here you can read online Murray N. Rothbard - Economic Controversies full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Ludwig von Mises Institute, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Murray N. Rothbard Economic Controversies
  • Book:
    Economic Controversies
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Ludwig von Mises Institute
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Economic Controversies: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Economic Controversies" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

After Murray Rothbard finished his theoretical magnum opus - Man, Economy, and State - he turned his attention away from pure positive theory toward dealing with the opposition to Austrian theory. The result was a long series of fantastic scholarly articles taking on every error of the day, and our day too. Together they form a volume 2 of his great work. This is Economic Controversies. He covers the same range of topics in Man, Economy, and State. Most all have been published, but they are strewn out among journals that are hard to access or books that are out of print. Some have never been published. Rothbard gives his all in these critiques of the opponents of Austrian theory and policy, slicing through fallacies with breathtaking virtuosity. It s a model of intellectual combat, page after page of razor-sharp thinking and crystal-clear prose. To have this all in one place, beautifully organized, creates a treasure in the history of economic ideas. Gene Epstein of Barrons writes the outstanding introduction. The price is thrillingly affordable for this gigantic hardback. Introduction by Gene Epstein Section One: Method The Mantle of Science What is the Proper Way to Study Man? Praxeology as the Method of the Social Sciences Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics Praxeology, Value Judgments, and Public Policy In Defense of Extreme Apriorism Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller The Hermeneutical Invasion of Philosophy and Economics Section Two: The Austrian School New Light on the Prehistory of the Austrian School The Present State of Austrian Economics Ludwig von Mises and the Paradigm for Our Age Value Implications of Economic Theory The Myth of Efficiency Breaking Out of the Walrasian Box: Schumpeter and Hansen Professor Rolph on the Discounted Marginal Productivity Theory Professor Kirzner on Entrepreneurship Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics Section Three: Property and the Public Sector The Politics of Political Economists Justice and Property Rights Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution The Fallacy of the Public Sector Statistics: Achilles s Heel of Government How and How Not to Desocialize Section Four: Taxation The Myth of Neutral Taxation The Myth of Tax Reform The Consumption Tax: A Critique The Case Against the Flat Tax The Uneasy Case for Degressive Taxation: A Critique of Blum and Kalven The Single Tax: Economic and Moral Implications The Value-Added Tax is Not the Answer A Reply to Georgist Criticisms Section Five: Trade and Freedom Freedom, Inequality, Primitivism, and the Division of Labor Restrictionist Pricing of Labor Mercantilism: A Lesson for Our Times? Capitalism versus Statism A Future of Peace and Capitalism Section Six: Money, Banking, and Calculation The Austrian Theory of Money Money, the State, and Modern Mercantilism Austrian Definitions of the Supply of Money Gold vs. Fluctuating Fiat Exchange Rates The Case For a Genuine Gol

Murray N. Rothbard: author's other books


Who wrote Economic Controversies? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Economic Controversies — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Economic Controversies" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

ECONOMIC

Controversies

The Ludwig von Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors and wishes to thank these Patrons, in particular:

________________

Joseph Edward Paul Melville
top dog
Stefano Quadrio Curzio

________________

Andreas Acavalos

Patrick T. Mahon, Jr.

Henry Ahler

Naju G. Mancheril

Wesley and Terri Alexander

Peter and Deborah Martin

Donald E. Bently

William W. Massey, Jr.

Steven R. Berger

Samuel Medrano, M.D.

Dr. Karl Blasius

in honor of Rodolfo and Noemi Medrano

John H. Bolstad

Michael L. Merritt

Herbert Borbe

Brian E. Millsap

Roman J. Bowser

Wiley L. Mossy

John Edward Burgess

Paul F. Peppard

Carl S. Creager

Nicholas Pusateri

Jeremy S. Davis

Edward W. Rehak

Satyabodhi Densmore

Sheldon Rose

Dr. Edward E. Donaldson

Karen C. Ross, Ph.D.

Dr. Larry J. Eshelman

in memory of Philip F. Bagwell, Ph.D.

Lee A. Everhart

Thomas S. Ross

Ernest A. Fata

JesusOnTaxes.com

In memory of John David Fernandez

James A. Sadowsky

Steven Frazer

Mr. and Mrs. Joseph P. Schirrick

Mr. and Mrs. Joel Gompert

Norman K. Singleton

David W. Groff

Carlton M. Smith

James E. Hall

Geb Sommer

Mark L. Hart III

Mr. and Mrs. Dennis A. Sperduto

Dr. Frederic Herman

Reginald Thatcher and Nancy Dale

Jonathon B. Hurley

Thatcher 1981 Trust

Mr. and Mrs. Robert S. James

David W. Tice

Richard J. Kossmann, M.D.

Quinten and Marian Ward

Daniel Krawisz

William P. Weidner

Bailey B. Liipfert, Jr.

Dr. Thomas L. Wenck

Arthur L. Loeb

Mr. and Mrs. Walter F. Woodul III

ECONOMIC

Controversies

MURRAY N. ROTHBARD

Economic Controversies - image 1

Copyright 2011 Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative - photo 2

Copyright 2011 Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Published by Ludwig von Mises Institute
518 West Magnolia Avenue
Auburn, Alabama 36832
Mises.org

ISBN: 978-1-933550-96-1

Contents
Introduction

I t was nearly forty years ago that Murray Rothbard changed my life. I was then a PhD candidate in economics at the New School for Social Research in downtown Manhattan, while also teaching Principles courses at a local university. And I was rapidly losing interest in the whole subject.

Bored by the prattling of the left-wing crowd who dominated the New School, I could find nothing very satisfying in mainstream economics either. The New Schools left-wingers certainly cared about achieving a free society. But their radical agenda mainly consisted of the instrumentalist ideas of the econ departments emeritus professor Adolph Lowe, which boiled down to coercing people into following the dictates of elitists like him.

My only real objection to conventional economics was that it also bored me. If a theory like perfect competition was remote from reality, it seemed like a judgment on the imperfections of capitalism. After all, to the degree that capitalism was not perfectly competitive, it fell prey to the evils of imperfect competition, which might require intervention from antitrust. As a typically zonked-out product of conventional schooling, I vaguely believed, that to the degree that any textbook theory failed to explain reality, so much the worse for reality. (Not long ago I spoke with an econ grad student who, when pressed, believed this quite explicitly.)

Always a compulsive book-browser, I had more than once leafed through a two-volume work titled Man, Economy, and State in the New School library, whose author, Murray Rothbard, I had barely heard of. After the third or fourth look, I finally began reading the bookand experienced one eureka moment after another. Two especially memorable moments reflected the leftist tradition in which I was then mired.

First, I learned that, if leftists thought capital deserved no share of the economic bounty, they were in a sense more right than they knew. Rothbard explained that, in a free market, there were no financial returns to owners of capital goods as such. Since capital goods consisted of such items as factories, machinery, offices, and desks, these goods were entirely the product of labor and land (or resources). So the monetary value of newly created capital goods is entirely attributable to the purchase of land and labor, with nothing remaining for capital goods owners.

How, then, did capital goods owners make any money at all? The money they received came in two forms: interest payments for advancing resources in the present and profits for their entrepreneurial foresightunless, of course, they were unsuccessful entrepreneurs and suffered losses.

Second was Rothbards devastating refutation of the theory of imperfect or monopolistic competitiondear to leftists hearts, since it highlighted the irrationality of capitalism. A cornerstone of this theory is that a monopolistic competitor like Marioni Brothers Barbershop (monopolistic because there is only one set of Marioni Brothers; competitive, since there are many barbershops), always operate with excess capacity.

Economist Paul Samuelson had in fact targeted barber shops in his best-selling Principles text, observing that The barbershop has excess capacity, with empty chairs much of the time, as he inveighed against the wasteful social losses resulting.

Even before I read Rothbard, it occurred to me that, in this case at least, Professor Samuelson may have been missing something. Given his flexible work schedule, he may have had a habit of going for his haircut on a weekday, which would explain why he kept noticing empty chairs. Had he gone instead on Saturdays, he might have noticed that all the barber chairs were full, and that business was actually backed up. It then might have occurred to him that our hypothetical Marioni Brothers were not so dumb as to waste their money on excess capacity.

The problem they actually faced as businessmen was the classic tradeoff between peaks and troughs in demand. Had they not had empty chairs during the week, they wouldnt have been able to take advantage of the glut in demand on weekends.

Such were my tentative doubts. What Rothbard exposed was the preposterousness of the whole formulation. For why assume that all such monopolistic competitors necessarily invest in excess capacity? To plan a plant for producing x units, he quotes economist Roy Harrod observing, while knowing that it will only be possible to maintain an output of x y units, is surely to suffer from schizophrenia. It made no more sense to believe that all such businessmen would waste funds on excess as it was to believe that they would all consistently underinvest and plan on inadequate capacity.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Economic Controversies»

Look at similar books to Economic Controversies. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Economic Controversies»

Discussion, reviews of the book Economic Controversies and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.