• Complain

John H Kautsky - Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge

Here you can read online John H Kautsky - Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2020, publisher: Routledge, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

John H Kautsky Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge
  • Book:
    Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2020
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

One of the pre-eminent scholars in the history and theory of European socialism, John Kautsky in this volume develops the argument that Marxism and Leninism are two quite different ideologies. He counterposes this view with the commonly accepted one of Leninism as simply one form that Marxism took in the course of its evolution. The easy identification of Marxism and Leninism with each other has been responsible for great confusion in the realm of both scholarly and political discourse.Kautsky develops his position within the tradition of the sociology of knowledge, by the close examination of the different meanings of the Marxist vocabulary as it was used by Marxists and Leninists. His frame of reference turns on the position of labor in turn-of-the-century industrial Europe and the role of modernizing intellectuals in underdeveloped countries. While the vocabulary used was often common to Marx and Lenin, Marxism was explicitly concerned with appeals to workers in industrial nations such as Germany and Austria, whereas Leninism appeals to revolutionaries in underdeveloped nations such as Russia and China.Whatever be the current assessment of the future of socialism and communism, Kautsky holds that it is important to study the core structure of both Marxism and Leninism, since they were major phenomena that powerfully affected the world in the twentieth century. Beyond that, in dealing with how different ideologies can be ensconced within the same rhetoric, the book offers an outstanding entrance into the sociology of knowledge as a tool for political analysis. This is a unique work in the function of language no less than the nature of ideology.The work is divided into fiveparts: Two environments, two ideologies, one terminology. The evolution of Marxism, its appeals in the German Empire. The evolution of Leninism, its appeals to strata involved in making modernizing revolutions. The differential outcomes of Marxism in the East and Leninism in the West. And finally, an examination of why Marxism and Leninism have been seen as a single ideology. In a new essay prepared for this new edition, Kautsky provides important autobiographical as well as historical reflections on how this book fits into the overall pattern of the authors work.

John H Kautsky: author's other books


Who wrote Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Marxism
and
Leninism:
Different Ideologies
Marxism
and
Leninism:
Different Ideologies
An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge
John H. Kautsky
with a new introduction by the author
Originally published in 1994 by Greenwood Press Published 2002 by Transaction - photo 1
Originally published in 1994 by Greenwood Press.
Published 2002 by Transaction Publishers
Published 2017 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
New material this edition copyright 2002 by Taylor & Francis
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2001047645
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Kautsky, John H., 1922-
[Marxism and Leninism, not Marxism-Leninism]
Marxism and Leninism: different ideologies : an essay in the sociology
of knowledge / John H. Kautsky ; with a new introduction by the author.
p. cm.
Originally published: Marxism and Leninism, not Marxism-Leninism.
Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 1994, in series: Contributions in
political science ; no. 335.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN: 0-7658-0911-7 (pbk.: alk. paper)
1. SocialismHistory. 2. CommunismHistory. I. Title.
HX73.K375 2001
335.4dc21 2001047645
ISBN 13: 978-0-7658-0911-7 (pbk)
To the Department of Political Science at Washington University in St. Louis
It is not the consciousness of men that
determines their existence, but, on the
contrary, their social existence that determines
their consciousness.
Karl Marx
Contents

If, approaching age eighty, I may be forgiven some autobiographical or, rather, autobibliographical reflections, I can now see the beginnings of the history of the present book in my very first book, Moscow and the Communist Party of India (Wiley, 1956). There I documented and analyzed the emergence, beginning in 1947, of a drastically changed Communist strategy in response to the development of the Cold War and also as a result of the Chinese Communist revolution. The Communists enemy was now defined no longer as capitalism or fascism, but as imperialismthat is, the United States. The classes whose members were to be appealed to were hence no longer merely the working class or the lower classes generally, but also the capitalist bourgeoisie. By late 1949, an authoritative Chinese Communist statement, strongly endorsed in Moscow, went so far as to prescribe that the working classthat is, the Communist partiesmust unite with all classes, parties, groups, organizations and individuals opposed to imperialism.
In one paragraph, I noted that the effective substitution of the Cold War for the class struggle was a complete perversion of Marxism, but only a logical development of Leninism. In Marxism, socialist parties were tools of the working class, while to Lenin the working class was the tool of the Party. Other classes could be similarly used, not only obviously the peasantry, but even the capitalists.
Here the point I tried to substantiate in the present book is already implicit: Marxism and Leninism are politically quite different ideologies. Marxism appeals to and seeks to represent the industrial working class. Leninism seeks to use the working class and other classes for its ends. But what are its ends? What interests does Leninism represent? What functions do classes perform when they serve as tools of the Party? There are no answers to these questions in my first book.
What I did not yet understand, or at least expressand neither did the Communist leaders themselveswas that the shift from anti-capitalism to anti-imperialism, which involved a shift from a focus on industrial Western Europe to one on underdeveloped Asia, was more than the adoption of what I still thought of as a mere Communist strategy. It revealed that Leninism was an ideology and Communism was a movement appropriate to the politics of underdeveloped countries rather than of industrial ones.
In Russia, and then the Soviet Union, the Communist regime pursued policies of a modernizing movement in an underdeveloped countryabove all, the policy of rapid industrialization. But for thirty years after they gained power, the Communist leaders in Russia, thinking of themselves as Marxists, concentrated their efforts to gain support abroad on converting the workers of industrial Europe to their cause. These efforts mostly failed, for Soviet success in industrialization, largely at workers and peasants expense, had no appeal in already industrialized countries.
Communist parties no doubt shifted their propaganda line from class struggle to anti-imperialism to serve the needs of Soviet foreign policy in the Cold War. But in this process, they replaced the Marxist language of proletarian class struggle against capitalism that was irrelevant to the politics of underdeveloped countries with the language of anti-imperialism. It could appeal in such countries to many people regardless of their class, and particularly to modernizing movements aiming at rapid industrialization. After thirty years, Communist parties in underdeveloped countries could at last speak a language that could be politically effective and was consistent with the appeal of Soviet domestic policy of rapid industrialization.
As my research interests broadened to a study of the politics of underdeveloped countries, and especially of anti-colonial and anti-traditional movements and their revolutions, I soon realized that it was not only the new strategy evolving from 1947 on, but the very nature of Leninism that made Communism such a modernizing movement. I advanced and elaborated this view in my two books, Political Change in Underdeveloped Countries (Wiley, 1962) and Communism and the Politics of Development (Wiley, 1968). The latter is a collection of ten articles on Communism I had written from 1955 to 1968. One of the earliest ones, first published in 1957, concluded with the following paragraph, which already outlines some of my arguments in the present volume:
It may now be time to abandon the categories of thought in which Lenin conceived of himself and his revolution and in which most of his contemporaries, both friends and foes, were almost necessarily entrapped Lenin was not voicing the ideology of an industrial proletariat but was a spokesman of a part of the intelligentsia in an underdeveloped country, of a group in quest of political power and in search of a short-cut to industrialization. The Bolshevik revolution, then, is to be understood not as the first proletarian-socialist revolution but as the first successful seizure of power by such an intelligentsia
In my next book, The Political Consequences of Modernization (Wiley, 1972), I argued that the underdeveloped countries were not merely behind the industrialized ones in their development, but were following a different historical track, and I introduced the distinction between the processes of modernization from within and modernization from without. My analysis of Communism was no longer presented in a separate book or chapter or even paragraph, but was completely integrated with the analysis of ideologies, movements, revolutions, and regimes of modernizers that are reactions to modernization from without and quite different from the political consequences of modernization from within.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge»

Look at similar books to Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge»

Discussion, reviews of the book Marxism and Leninism: An Essay in the Sociology of Knowledge and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.