Rethinking Hobbes and Kant
Rethinking Hobbes and Kant argues that predominant approaches to the theoretical relationship between Hobbes and Kant have reached conclusions that were pre-digested in assumptions about the isms which these two writers are propounding. Chou shows how these assumptions have inhibited commentators from recognising the affinities between Hobbes and Kants political philosophies, or, if they have, prevented them from providing a plausible explanation of those affinities.
To provide a fresh understanding of the relation between Hobbes and Kant, this book examines and compares what they actually wrote about some central conceptions in political theory, as it becomes visible once the assumptions out of which they are formed are set aside. Chou argues that what matters is that we reflect upon our own assumptions, and that we have at least some conscious awareness that the assumptions of our day were not held all the time and everywhere, and that we do not reify them into crude models which distort the thought of the past and the present in equal measure. This book, therefore, seeks to bring into the arena of conscious thought assumptions which are deeply rooted in many modern minds and which work to distort many current studies of the relationship between Hobbes and Kants political philosophies, with negative consequences for the understanding of Hobbes, of Kant, and of politics itself.
Providing a fresh understanding of the relation between Hobbes and Kant, this book will be of great use for graduates and scholars of Political Theory, Philosophy and Political Sociology.
Chia-Yu Chou is Assistant Professor in the Department of Public Administration and Policy at National Taipei University, Taiwan.
Rethinking Political and International Theory
Series Editors: Keith Breen, Dan Bulley, Susan McManus
Committed to show you in what ways traditional approaches in political and international theory may be applied to 21st century politics, this series will present inventive and pioneering theoretical work designed to build a common framework for the latest scholarly research on political theory and international relations. Intended to be international and interdisciplinary in scope, the series will contain works which advance our understanding of the relevance of seminal thinkers to our current socio-political context(s) as well as problematize and offer new insights into key political concepts and phenomena within the arena of politics and international relations.
Most recent titles:
The Concert of Civilizations: The Common Roots of Western and Islamic Constitutionalism
Jeremy Kleidosty
Virtue and Economy: Essays on Morality and Markets
Andrius Bielskis and Kelvin Knight
Revolutionary Subjectivity in Post-Marxist Thought: Laclau, Negri, Badiou
Oliver Harrison
Human Rights, Human Dignity, and Cosmopolitan Ideals: Essays on Critical Theory and Human Rights
Matthias Lutz-Bachmann
Rethinking Hobbes and Kant
The role and consequences of assumption in
political theory
Chia-Yu Chou
First published 2017
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
2017 Chia-Yu Chou
The right of Chia-Yu Chou to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
A catalog record for this book has been requested
ISBN: 978-1-4724-7256-4 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-315-60606-4 (ebk)
Typeset in Times New Roman
by Swales & Willis Ltd, Exeter, Devon, UK
I started this book in October 2007. At that time, the project that this book aims to bring to completion did not seem as difficult as I now recognise it to be. Although four years is a fairly long time, due to the complexity of the topic and my ongoing attempts to understand it better this project is still not as fully realised as it ought to be. That said, it could not have achieved even its current state without the help of so many people.
First and foremost, I would like to express my utmost gratitude to Tim Stanton, my PhD supervisor, who has guided and supported me in every aspect of my studies at the University of York. He has not only read and made comment on all my work but also helped me to articulate my very rough ideas and develop my immature arguments. If I have learned to be anything close to an independent researcher, any credit will have to be attributed to his guidance. He is not only a model researcher but also a perfect supervisor for me.
I am also extremely grateful to Jon Parkin, my back-up supervisor, whose works and comments have continued to be a great source of inspiration. He also read most of the early drafts of my book, and provided many insightful ideas to help me to improve them.
I would also like to record my appreciation for all the help I have received from the Department of Politics at the University of York. It has provided a very encouraging research environment for studying political philosophy. The Morrell Political Theory Workshop has long been an inspirational academic occasion for friendly academic discussions and useful feedback. I am also grateful for the financial support I have received from the National Science Council (NSC) and the Academia Sinica in Taiwan, which has enabled me to continue my studies.
In the introduction to his Collected Works the Oxford philosopher Gilbert Ryle congratulated himself for having, when still a young man, shaken off the central article of faith of the historians of philosophy, that philosophers, like theologians, are campaigners for and against isms, which flourish... a philosophers name but which are, in fact, the fabrications of later and lesser minds (Ryle, 1971: ix). Faith is often harder to shake than this, and harder still to shake off entirely; and the article of faith that Ryle attributed to the historians of philosophy of his day is widely diffused in our own, where it is held not only by historians of philosophy but by many political theorists and intellectual historians. Few if any of those who retain this faith would confess to holding explicitly the view that Ryle describes; but it cannot be doubted that many hold something like this view implicitly, or that it has an important bearing on the claims they make about and on behalf of the philosophers about whom they write. At least this is the claim I wish to advance and explore in this book.
The medium through which I explore this claim is an investigation into some recent treatments of the theoretical relationship between the political theories of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant. This is for two reasons. One is that Hobbes and Kant, much more than most philosophers, continue to be treated, sometimes straightforwardly and sometimes by implication, as founders of schools of thought, of isms, for which they are the exemplary and consummate campaigners. The second reason is that a comparative study of the two is especially revealing of the effects of such treatment in interpretations of their political theory, and in understandings of politics more generally.