• Complain

Joseph B. Onyango Okello - Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil

Here you can read online Joseph B. Onyango Okello - Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Eugene, Oregon, year: 2017, publisher: Wipf & Stock, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Wipf & Stock
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017
  • City:
    Eugene, Oregon
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

A specific form of understanding of evil, in the problem of evil debate, gets assumed among a variety of materialistic naturalists. Owing to their physicalist and, in some cases, behaviorist philosophies, this understanding assumes a hedonistic view of pain that reduces valuation to pleasure and pain. Herein, all forms of good and evil get reduced to pleasure and pain. This work reorients the debate toward a more biblical understanding of evil based on an essentialist reading of ethics. The book argues that the hedonistic understanding of value characterizing prominent naturalistic materialists, such as those alluded to by J. L. Mackie, semantically seems to entail either a synonymous or a near synonymous relationship between evil and pain. The book further argues that this understanding, given the essentialist reading of ethics, seems wrongheaded. By reorienting the contours of the debate, it suggests that the problem of pain might, in effect, be quite different from the problem of evil and that neither problem necessarily entails the other. Seen in this way, neither problem casts doubt on belief in Gods existence.

Joseph B. Onyango Okello: author's other books


Who wrote Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Evil and Pain A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil Joseph B Onyango - photo 1
Evil and Pain

A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil

Joseph B. Onyango Okello

Dedicated to Sophie Munyao-Okellomy dear wife who continues to bear witness to - photo 2

Dedicated to

Sophie Munyao-Okellomy dear wife who continues to bear witness to Gods glory in the midst of intense suffering

Acknowledgments

S ince my seminary days, I have spent countless hours of reflection on the question of suffering and pain. Various individuals have helped shape my view along the way. One such individual is professor Jerry Walls, who encouraged me to seek higher levels of scholarship in my academic pursuits. Several classes of philosophy with Jerry planted an intellectual seed that spurred the urge for rational inquiry into issues affecting my immediate context, one of them being the major theme of this book.

Also, various encounters with Michael Peterson, professor of philosophy at Asbury Theological Seminary, influenced my thinking in many ways, thereby giving me a road map for developing the personal philosophy represented in this work. I am deeply indebted to Mike for the materials made available by the high level of scholarship exemplified in his works. Whereas I depart, in several ways, from Mikes and Jerrys philosophical assumptions as far as this work is concerned, I still owe both of them a deep gratitude for enabling me to aspire toward higher levels of scholarship.

I am also grateful to David Bradshaw, professor of philosophy at the University of Kentucky, not only for personally guiding me through the process of rigorous thinking that has now shaped my intellectual life, but also for encouraging me, by his example, to avoid the temptation of becoming a lazy scholar. Memories of numerous classroom and office meetings with David haunt me whenever the appetitive aspects of my soul refuse to bow to the dictates of reason.

Besides these world-class scholars, I received great encouragement from faculty and students at Asbury Theological Seminary. Having taught a course on suffering, tragedy, and the Christian faith twice every three years, I am only just now beginning to understand the enormity of the subject. However, students and faculty of Asbury Seminary encouraged me to put my thoughts in writing, sensing that I might have something to say. Well, dear oneshere it is!

Within the Asbury community, I would specifically like to thank Judy Seitz who read the entire manuscript, offered invaluable suggestions for improvement as far as the language and formatting is concerned, and helped save my work from glaring and embarrassing errors. She is definitely a jewel at Asbury Seminary. I must add, however, that any conceptual or grammatical errors that might attend this work are, of course, mine.

I also thank my wonderful wife, Sophie, who always looks at me with bewilderment when I toss philosophical ideas her way. Just the same, she has always encouraged me to pursue academic excellence in spite of her suspicion that my mental faculties have quite possibly run amok. I would not trade her support and wonderful companionship for another. More importantly, Sophie does know the meaning of suffering, owing to her recent battle with cancer and subsequent treatments, which often seem as bad and, perhaps, just as dangerous as the disease itself. Countless trips to different doctors to help her with the healing process have been quite demanding, putting unimaginable strain on her. However, owing to her strong faith in Christ (much stronger than mine, of course), she continues to be an encouragement to my son and me.

The question of pain and suffering, therefore, has not been merely theoretical to my family. It has knocked at our doorstep and remains in our backyard for an indefinite period of time. The fact that it has been with us for this period of time, without question, afflicts us with great concern. Just the same, we still find hope in the one healer coming to us credentialed as the Great Physician. He alone can give us hope where none can be found.

For this reason, I thank my Savior and Redeemer Jesus Christ who conquered evil on the cross. Without him, the hope of finding release from suffering and pain is always an illusion. Without him, this book is a big lie. His promise, however, always stands, and we look forward to the day he will wipe off all our tears from our eyes and take away all the pains and sorrows from our lives.

Introduction

W hat is materialistic hedonism? Broadly construed, it is the view in ethics that, on the one hand, finds pleasure and pain intrinsically good and intrinsically evil, respectively, while on the other, denies the metaphysical vantage point of dualism that thinks of mind as an immaterial entity substantially separate from the physical human body. Whether or not this thesis counts as a necessary truth in the logical sense will be the subject of this investigation. By necessary truth, I refer to the kind of statements that cannot be false under any circumstances, and must, in addition, be true in all possible worlds. This hedonistic understanding of value that characterizes prominent naturalistic materialists, like that alluded to by J. L. Mackie (I describe this more fully in chapter ), semantically seems to entail either a synonymous or a near synonymous relationship between evil and pain.

As noted, the view seems to accept the general postulates of ethical hedonism, contending that all intrinsically desirable things are what we would call pleasure and all intrinsically undesirable things are what we would call pain . More accurately, all things desirable in themselves are pleasant states of mind and all things undesirable in themselves are unpleasant states of mind. Moreover, one state of affairs remains more desirable in itself just in case that state of affairs contains more than another different state of mind. This view believes that the quantity of value in any state of affairs ought to be quantified by the amount of pleasure in it.

According to Richard B. Brandt, philosophers such as Aristippus, Epicurus, Locke, Hobbes, Hume, Bentham, Mill, and Sigdwick defend ethical hedonism in their writings. Some of these philosophers, such as Epicurus, Hume, and Mill accepted the postulates of materialism. The religious suppositions of Locke, however, would have rendered him more of a supernaturalist than a materialist. Additionally, whereas some philosophers made specific references to pleasure in their adumbrations of ethical hedonism, others also factored the idea of happiness into their explications as well. In their view, happiness seemed an intrinsic good. In saying that an individual is happy at any given time, the ethical hedonist really meant the individual in question was experiencing pleasure at the time. Some philosophers, however, felt that happiness was rather different from pleasure, and the debate on whether or not happiness and pleasure are essentially the same continues.

According to Brandt, the hedonist would argue that the intrinsic desirability of a given state of affairs is something determined by the fact that the state of affairs is good, worthy of choice, or worthwhile when taken by itself. The hedonist does not deny that many things are desirable. Still, he or she does not find them desirable in themselves. The hedonist finds those things instrumentally desirable, but certainly not intrinsically desirable. Additionally, the hedonist observes that those things can be both instrumentally and intrinsically desirable. For the hedonist, a thing is instrumentally desirable if it results in later pleasures, and instrumentally undesirable if it yields later pain.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil»

Look at similar books to Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil»

Discussion, reviews of the book Evil and Pain: A Critique of the Materialistic Account of Evil and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.