• Complain

Rosalind Dixon - Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age

Here you can read online Rosalind Dixon - Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Oxford, year: 2023, publisher: Oxford University Press, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Rosalind Dixon Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age
  • Book:
    Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2023
  • City:
    Oxford
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Democratic dysfunction can arise in both at risk and well-functioning constitutional systems. It can threaten a systems responsiveness to both minority rights claims and majoritarian constitutional understandings. Responsive Judicial Review aims to counter this dysfunction using examples from both the global north and global south, including leading constitutional courts in the US, UK, Canada, India, South Africa, and Colombia, as well as select aspects of the constitutional jurisprudence of courts in Australia, Fiji, Hong Kong, and Korea.
In this book, Dixon argues that courts should adopt a sufficiently dialogic approach to countering relevant democratic blockages and look for ways to increase the actual and perceived legitimacy of their decisionsthrough careful choices about their framing, and the timing and selection of cases. By orienting judicial choices about constitutional construction toward promoting democratic responsiveness, or toward countering forms of democratic monopoly, blind spots, and burdens of inertia, judicial review helps safeguard a constitutional systems responsiveness to democratic majority understandings. The idea of responsive judicial review encourages courts to engage with their own distinct institutional position, and potential limits on their own capacity and legitimacy.
Dixon further explores the ways that this translates into the embracing of a weakened approach to judicial finality, compared to the traditional US-model of judicial supremacy, as well as a nuanced approach to the making of judicial implications, a calibrated approach to judicial scrutiny or judgments about proportionality, and an embrace of weak DS strong rather than wholly weak or strong judicial remedies. Not all courts will be equally well-placed to engage in review of this kind, or successful at doing so. For responsive judicial review to succeed, it must be sensitive to context-specific limitations of this kind. Nevertheless, the idea of responsive judicial review is explicitly normative and aspirational: it aims to provide a blueprint for how courts should think about the practice of judicial review as they strive to promote and protect democratic constitutional values.

Rosalind Dixon: author's other books


Who wrote Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
OXFORD COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM Series Editors RICHARD ALBERT William - photo 1
OXFORD COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM

Series Editors

RICHARD ALBERT

William Stamps Farish Professor of Law,

The University of Texas at Austin School of Law

ROBERT SCHTZE

Professor of European and Global Law,

Durham University and College of Europe

Responsive Judicial Review

OXFORD COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM

Series Editors

Richard Albert, William Stamps Farish Professor of Law,

The University of Texas at Austin Law School

Robert Schtze, Professor of European and Global Law,

Durham University and College of Europe

Comparative constitutional law has a long and distinguished history in intellectual thought and in the construction of public law. As political actors and the people who create or modify their constitutional orders, they often wish to learn from the experience and learning of others. This cross-fertilization and mutual interaction has only accelerated with the onset of globalization, which has transformed the world into an interconnected web that facilitates dialogue and linkages across international and regional structures. Oxford Comparative Constitutionalism seeks to publish scholarship of the highest quality in constitutional law that deepens our knowledge of local, national, regional, and global phenomena through the lens of comparative public law.

Advisory Board

Denis Baranger, Professor of Public Law, Universit Paris II Panthon-Assas

Wen-Chen Chang, Professor of Law, National Taiwan University

Roberto Gargarella, Professor of Law, Universidad Torcuato di Tella

Vicki C Jackson, Thurgood Marshall Professor of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law School

Christoph Mllers, Professor of Public Law and Jurisprudence, Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin

Cheryl Saunders A.O., Laureate Professor Emeritus, Melbourne Law School

ALSO PUBLISHED IN THIS SERIES

Deliberative Peace Referendums

Ron Levy, Ian OFlynn, Hoi L. Kong

Eternity Clauses In Democratic Constitutionalism

Silvia Suteu

Scales of Memory

Constitutional Justice and Historical Evil

Justin Collings

The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law

Edited by Philipp Dann, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bnnemann

City, State

Constitutionalism and the Megacity

Ran Hirschl

Constitutional Change In The Contemporary Socialist World

Ngoc Son Bui

Polands Constitutional Breakdown

Wojciech Sadurski

Abusive Constitutional Borrowing

Rosalind Dixon and David Landau

Responsive Judicial Review Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age - image 2

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,

United Kingdom

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries

Rosalind Dixon 2023

The moral rights of the author have been asserted

First Edition published in 2023

Impression: 1

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer

Public sector information reproduced under Open Government Licence v3.0

(http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/open-government-licence.htm)

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press

198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data available

Library of Congress Control Number: 2022934445

ISBN 9780192865779

eISBN 9780192689719

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192865779.001.0001

Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.

Acknowledgments

This book has been a long time in the making. In many places it draws on work I did during my doctorate/SJD at Harvard under the generous supervision of Frank Michelman, Martha Minow, Richard Fallon, Richard Goldstone, and Jacqui Bhabha. It also reflects time spent thinking and writing as an assistant professor and professor at the University of Chicago and University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, as well as during several visits as a visiting professor/fellow at Chicago, Harvard, and Columbia Law Schools. The attention in the book to the realities of democratic politics, and various possibilities for democratic experimentalism, is largely due to the intellectual influence of the University of Chicago and Columbia Law School. The enthusiasm for ideas about responsive law and regulation is shaped by many generous colleagues at UNSW, especially Theunis Roux and Martin Krygier.

The comparative method, and sensibility, I owe to many people around the world both near and farincluding colleagues at UNSW and Melbourne, many fellow members of the International Society of Public Law. Many of the ideas have also been shaped by valuable conversations over many years with colleagues such as Richard Albert, Micaela Alterio, Gabrielle Appleby, Ori Aronson, Ben Berger, Carlos Bernal Pulido, Nina Boughey, Sean Brennan, Dan Brinks, Jessica Bulman Pozen, Lisa Buton Crawford, Cora Chan, Adam Chilton, Mathilde Cohen, Victor Comella, Joel Colon Rios, Adam Cox, Javier Cuoso, Grainne de Burca, Maartje de Visser, Sujit Choudhry, Melissa Crouch, Erin Delaney, Evelyn Douek, Anna Dziedic, Richard Fallon, James Fowkes, Stephen Gardbaum, Roberto Gargarella, Conor Gearty, Claudia Geiringer, Jake Gersen, Tom Ginsburg, Mark Graber, Jamal Greene, Michaela Hailbronner, Andrew Harding, Ran Hirschl, Aziz Huq, Helen Irving, Samuel Issacharoff, Vicki Jackson, Aileen Kavanagh, Tarunabh Khaitan, Madhav Khosla, Paul Kildea, Jeff King, Heinz Klug, David Landau, David Law, Hanna Lerner, Daryl Levinson, Sandy Levinson, Ron Levy, Peter Leyland, Vanessa MacDonnell, Frank Michelman, Martha Minow, Sarah Murray, Jaclyn Neo, Roberto Niembro, Aoife Nolan, Kate ORegan, Will Partlett, Rick Pildes, Iddo Porat, Eric Posner, David Pozen, Kent Roach, Yaniv Roznai, Ruth Rubio, Wojciech Sadurksi, Adam Samaha, Cheryl Saunders, Jeff Seton, Amelia Simpson, James Stellios, Scott Stephenson, Kristen Stilt, Adrienne Stone, Lior Strahilevitz, David Strauss, Julie Suk, Mark Tushnet, Mariana Velasco Rivera, Sergio Verdugo, Mila Versteeg, Joseph Weiler, Lulu Weis, and Po Jen Yap, among many others. I am especially grateful to David Dyzenhaus for encouraging me to return to work on the book after a long delay, and to Mark Tushnet for his encouragement and guidance at many different stages of the project.

The book also reflects the intellectual debt I owe to a number of close colleagues and co-authors. The book inevitably reflects and has parallels with the work of many of those scholars who I most admire in the field, and it draws explicitly at a number of points on ideas developed in joint-authored work with Michaela Hailbronner, Samuel Issacharoff, Richard Holden, Amelia Loughland, Theunis Roux, Adrienne Stone, Mark Tushnet, and especially David Landau, and I am particularly grateful to these co-authors for so many helpful conversations and their permission to draw on those ideas as part of this project.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age»

Look at similar books to Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age»

Discussion, reviews of the book Responsive Judicial Review: Democracy and Dysfunction in the Modern Age and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.