• Complain

Peter A. Frensch - Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective

Here you can read online Peter A. Frensch - Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1995, publisher: Psychology Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Peter A. Frensch Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective
  • Book:
    Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Psychology Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1995
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This volume presents a state-of-the-science review of the most promising current European research -- and its historic roots of research -- on complex problem solving (CPS) in Europe. It is an attempt to close the knowledge gap among American scholars regarding the European approach to understanding CPS. Although most of the American researchers are well aware of the fact that CPS has been a very active research area in Europe for quite some time, they do not know any specifics about even the most important research. Part of the reason for this lack of knowledge is undoubtedly the fact that European researchers -- for the most part -- have been rather reluctant to publish their work in English-language journals.
The book concentrates on European research because the basic approach European scholars have taken to studying CPS is very different from one taken by North American researchers. Traditionally, American scholars have been studying CPS in natural domains -- physics, reading, writing, and chess playing -- concentrating primarily on exploring novice-expert differences and the acquisition of a complex skill. European scholars, in contrast, have been primarily concerned with problem solving behavior in artificially generated, mostly computerized, complex systems. While the American approach has the advantage of high external validity, the European approach has the advantage of system variables that can be systematically manipulated to reveal the effects of system parameters on CPS behavior. The two approaches are thus best viewed as complementing each other.
This volume contains contributions from four European countries -- Sweden, Switzerland, Great Britain, and Germany. As such, it accurately represents the bulk of empirical research on CPS which has been conducted in Europe. An international cooperation started two years ago with the goal of bringing the European research on complex problem solving to the awareness of American scholars. A direct result of that effort, the contributions to this book are both informative and comprehensive.

Peter A. Frensch: author's other books


Who wrote Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
COMPLEX
PROBLEM SOLVING
The European Perspective
COMPLEX
PROBLEM SOLVING
The European Perspective

Edited by
PETER A. FRENSCH
University of Missouri at Columbia
JOACHIM FUNKE
University of Bonn, Germany

Complex Problem Solving The European Perspective - image 1

First Published 1995 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Published 2014 by Psychology Press
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017

and by Psychology Press
27 Church Road, Hove, East Sussex, BN3 2FA

Psychology Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an
informa business

Copyright 1995, by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.

Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Complex problem solving: the European perspective / edited by Peter
A. Frensch, Joachim Funke.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8058-1336-5 (cloth: alk. paper). ISBN 0-8058-1783-2
(paper: alk. paper)
ISBN 978-0-805-81783-6 (hbk)
1. Cognitive neuroscience. 2. Cognitive science. I. Frensch,
Peter A. II. Funke, Joachim.
QP360.5.C66 1995
153.43dc20 95-4455
CIP

Publishers Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original may be apparent.

We dedicate this book to Donald E. Broadbent who suddenly and unexpectedly passed away during the final stages of the project. He was both an initiator and a very active contributor to the complex problem-solving scenes in Europe and North America, and was, perhaps more than anybody else, familiar with, and comfortably working within, the two approaches. Donald Broadbent will be deeply missed.

Contents


Peter A. Frensch and Joachim Funke


Axel Buchner


Dietrich Drner and Alex J. Wearing


Berndt Brehmer


Dianne C. Berry and Donald E. Broadbent


Oswald Huber


Jens F. Beckmann and Jrgen Guthke


Josef F. Krems


Uwe Funke


Joachim Funke


Rainer H. Kluwe


Robert J. Sternberg

Jens F. Beckmann, Psychologisches Institut, Universitt Leipzig, Tieckstr. 2, D-04275 Leipzig, Germany

Dianne C. Berry, Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AL, England

Berndt Brehmer, Department of Psychology, University of Uppsala, Box 1854, S-751 48 Uppsala, Sweden

Donald E. Broadbent (deceased), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, England

Axel Buchner, FB1Psychologie, Universitt Trier, Universittsring 15, D-54286 Trier, Germany

Dietrich Drner, Lehrstuhl Psychologie II, Universitt Bamberg, Markusplatz 3, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany

Peter A. Frensch, Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Columbia, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211

Joachim Funke, Psychologisches Institut, Universitt Bonn, Rmerstr. 164, D-53117 Bonn, Germany

Uwe Funke, Lehrstuhl fr Psychologie, Universitt Hohenheim, Institut 540 F, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany

Jrgen Guthke, Psychologisches Institut, Universitt Leipzig, Tieckstr. 2, D-04275, Leipzig, Germany

Oswald Huber, Psychologisches Institut, Universitt Fribourg, Route des Fougres, CH-1701 Fribourg, Switzerland

Rainer H. Kluwe, Institut fr Kognitionsforschung, Universitt der Bundeswehr, Holstenhofweg 85, D-22043 Hamburg, Germany

Josef F. Krems, Institut fr Psychologie, Universitt Regensburg, Universittsstr. 31, Gebude PT, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany

Robert J. Sternberg, Department of Psychology, Yale University, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205

Alex J. Wearing, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia

Imagine your typical 5-year-old sliding all over the living-room floor while feverishly using her Lego building blocks to construct the worlds biggest mansion. And imagine the engineer at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station thinking of all possible ways to stop the greatest atomic disaster from happening. Both the 5-year-old and the seasoned engineer engage in complex problem solving (CPS). At an abstract level, we might define complex problem solving as thinking that

occurs to overcome barriers between a given state and a desired goal state by means of behavioral and/or cognitive, multistep activities. [In CPS,] the given state, goal state, and barriers are complex, change dynamically during problem solving, and are intransparent, [and] the exact properties of the given state, goal state, and barriers are unknown to the solver. CPS implies the efficient interaction between a solver and the situational requirements of the task, and involves a solvers cognitive, emotional, personal, and social abilities and knowledge. (Frensch & Funke, this volume)

Clearly, complex problem solving, defined in this way, is ubiquitous, even though the results of such problem solving are, gratefully, not always as important as they were in the Chernobyl example mentioned earlier. However, not every task we face gives rise to complex problem solving. Rather, at least according to our definition, a problem must be (a) novel, (b) complex, (c) dynamically changing over time, and (d) intransparent before we can legitimately call our dealings with the problem complex problem solving. CPS, thus, is not a straightforward extension of simple problem solving (SPS), that is, problem solving involving relatively simple problems such as choosing the right clothes for a festive occasion. Instead, CPS and SPS are qualitatively different. For example, SPS frequently serves to overcome a single barrier; CPS, in contrast, deals with a large number of barriers that coexist simultaneously. Because there are multiple barriers, a single cognitive or behavioral activity may not be sufficient to reach the goal state. Rather, a well-planned, prioritized, set of cognitions and actions may need to be performed in order to get closer to the desired goal state.

Complex problem solving, then, is a topic that deserves our all attention, and certainly the attention of experimental psychologistsif only for the potentially disastrous consequences of problem solving gone awry. Why, however, do we need an entire volume dedicated to European research on CPS? The answer is twofold: First, we need such a book because much of the existing, original European research has been published exclusively in non-English-language journals or books and has not been accessible to North American scholarswith the exception of those of us lucky enough to be familiar with several languages. And second, we need such a book because European research on CPS has a flavor that is quite different from that of most of the research conducted in North America. That is to say that both the theoretical and empirical approaches to studying CPS have been quite different in Europe and North America during roughly the past two decades.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective»

Look at similar books to Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective»

Discussion, reviews of the book Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.