• Complain

Mark Lynas - Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs

Here you can read online Mark Lynas - Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: Bloomsbury Sigma, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Mark Lynas Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs
  • Book:
    Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Bloomsbury Sigma
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Mark Lynas was one of the original GM field wreckers. Back in the 1990s--working undercover with his colleagues in the environmental movement--he would descend on trial sites of genetically modified crops at night and hack them to pieces. Two decades later, most people around the world--from New York to China--still think that GMO foods are bad for their health or likely to damage the environment. But Mark has changed his mind. This book explains why.

In 2013, in a world-famous recantation speech, Mark apologised for having destroyed GM crops. He spent the subsequent years touring Africa and Asia, and working with plant scientists who are using this technology to help smallholder farmers in developing countries cope better with pests, diseases and droughts.

This book lifts the lid on the anti-GMO craze and shows how science was left by the wayside as a wave of public hysteria swept the world. Mark takes us back to the origins of the technology and introduces the scientific pioneers who invented it. He explains what led him to question his earlier assumptions about GM food, and talks to both sides of this fractious debate to see what still motivates worldwide opposition today. In the process he asks--and answers--the killer question: how did we all get it so wrong on GMOs?

Mark Lynas: author's other books


Who wrote Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Also available in the Bloomsbury Sigma series Sex on Earth by Jules Howard - photo 1

Also available in the Bloomsbury Sigma series Sex on Earth by Jules Howard - photo 2

Also available in the Bloomsbury Sigma series:

Sex on Earth by Jules Howard

p53: The Gene that Cracked the Cancer Code by Sue Armstrong

Atoms Under the Floorboards by Chris Woodford

Spirals in Time by Helen Scales

Chilled by Tom Jackson

A is for Arsenic by Kathryn Harkup

Breaking the Chains of Gravity by Amy Shira Teitel

Suspicious Minds by Rob Brotherton

Herding Hemingways Cats by Kat Arney

Electronic Dreams by Tom Lean

Sorting the Beef from the Bull by Richard Evershed and Nicola Temple

Death on Earth by Jules Howard

The Tyrannosaur Chronicles by David Hone

Soccermatics by David Sumpter

Big Data by Timandra Harkness

Goldilocks and the Water Bears by Louisa Preston

Science and the City by Laurie Winkless

Bring Back the King by Helen Pilcher

Furry Logic by Matin Durrani and Liz Kalaugher

Built on Bones by Brenna Hassett

My European Family by Karin Bojs

4th Rock from the Sun by Nicky Jenner

Patient H69 by Vanessa Potter

Catching Breath by Kathryn Lougheed

PIG/PORK by Pa Spry-Marqus

The Planet Factory by Elizabeth Tasker

Wonders Beyond Numbers by Johnny Ball

Immune by Catherine Carver

I, Mammal by Liam Drew

Reinventing the Wheel by Bronwen and Francis Percival

Making the Monster by Kathryn Harkup

Best Before by Nicola Temple

Catching Stardust by Natalie Starkey

In memory of David MacKay

Contents A note on definitions Im using the terms GMO GM and GE somewhat - photo 3

Contents

A note on definitions. Im using the terms GMO, GM and GE somewhat interchangeably in this book. The first of these is especially problematic. I've used it in the title because it has the highest international recognisability factor, but many scientists I know refuse to use it on principle. What is a Genetically Modified Organism anyway? Your pet dog is genetically modified from the original wolf otherwise you wouldn't let it anywhere near your kids. All our crops and domesticated animals have been genetically modified from their ancestors to be useful to humans. So are they also GMOs? Thats what bugs the scientists: it makes no logical sense to single out anything that has been altered in the lab for special concern and even vilification. Changing genes via laboratory molecular techniques, the main subject of this book, is not much different from conventional selective breeding.

I use the term GMO to indicate the popular debate, and I do not claim it is scientifically valid or even very definable. In fact, the terms GM (Genetically Modified) and GE (Genetically Engineered) are preferable. Ive found GM is mostly used in the UK, because in the US it means a large car company. Ive used both in the text to avoid repetition.

Its three in the morning, and properly dark. But theres still just enough light, cast by nearby street lamps a couple of fields away, to make out the neat rows of maize plants. They are healthy and strong, about shoulder height. Although there is far too little light to see colours, I fancy I can make out the lush dark green of the broad leaves and robust stems. As I ready my machete Im struck by how, even when it seems pitch dark outside, there is always just enough light once your eyes get attuned to it to see by. This theory has only ever failed once: a couple of years earlier, in South Wales, as I traversed a woodland with some other activists protesting against an opencast coal mine. That time it was so dark that I walked straight into a tree. Tonight were closer to civilisation, somewhere in eastern England; in the deep country certainly, but in that part of England youre always close enough to some human habitation. Thats why we keep our torches turned off. You never know whos watching.

I feel a momentary twinge of conscience as I swing back and my machete hacks into the first row of maize. Im a hobby gardener and have spent time on farms; I dont like to destroy healthy plants. These are admittedly better looking than anything I have ever grown, but then theyre genetically modified and therefore to my mind not quite natural. I see this innocent-looking maize as an artificial intrusion, a form of living pollution that doesnt belong in the English countryside. Thats why they must be utterly eradicated, I remind myself, as I build up to a rhythm. Slash, whack, chop. Slash, whack, chop. Its surprisingly easy when you get going. The maize plants topple straight over, like trees clear-felled in a forest.

Im not alone, of course. There are about a dozen of us, spread out evenly across the field, each working a row. You cant be too careful in the near-dark with sharp tools. This would not be a good time to cause an injury. Some of the other activists are close friends; others I hardly know. We have travelled together cooped up in a hired van, a couple of hours on the road, wearing our hoodies and surrounded by metal tools. The dress code is black, or as dark as you can make it. Like all criminals, we dont carry ID, just some spare cash in case of emergency.

Its a funny feeling being on the wrong side of the law. Many people, for good reason or bad, will know what I mean. Suddenly everything is reversed. The friendly policeman is an enemy; you no longer feel a member of everyday society in quite the same way. It is almost as if a veil is drawn between you and ordinary people. You are an outlaw, you carry a secret. You might look normal, but youre not. There are things you cannot say, things that you should not reveal to strangers. On that night in the maize field, as at most times, we are even careful with each other: many people use nicknames or assumed names. Information is typically shared on a need to know basis only. Asking too many questions would lead to suspicion. That fellow activist in the standard uniform of combat clothes and dreadlocks just might turn out to be an undercover cop.

On a different occasion, we were once stopped by police, all piled together in the back of a car with our spades and blades, somewhere in the back roads of Norfolk. The cops made us all get out and stand by the side of the country lane while they wrote down our names and addresses in a notebook. Like a fool I blurted out real details. I spent the next few days in a fog of paranoia, waiting for a knock at the door. It never came, and I still wonder what those police officers must have thought, pulling over this strange car full of mostly youthful gardeners in the middle of the night. Did they guess what we were up to? Did they really believe our hastily invented cover story about being on our way back from a garden party?

After three-quarters of an hour in the maize field we are making good progress. A good portion of the crop, earlier so vigorous and lush, is now lying wilted and flat. Leaves and stalks, separated from the strong roots that sustained them, are getting trampled into the English mud. But there is still much more to do, and after a short break and some whispered conversations, we redouble our efforts. Slash, whack, chop. Slash, whack, chop. There are car headlights, passing by on the other side of the hedge that runs alongside the genetically modified maize field. Are they moving too slowly, as a patrol car would? We all freeze, but they pass on, humming into the distance. A few minutes later, there are different lights flashing over in the far corner. Have we been busted? We pause again. Then the lights stop a trick of the night, perhaps. I continue cutting, keeping my eyes on the job, focusing only on the row of maize plants directly in front of me. Slash, whack, chop. Slash, whack, chop.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs»

Look at similar books to Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs»

Discussion, reviews of the book Seeds of Science: Why We Got It So Wrong On GMOs and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.