• Complain

Azerrad - Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music

Here you can read online Azerrad - Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, year: 2017;2018, publisher: HarperCollins;Dey Street Books, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Azerrad Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music
  • Book:
    Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    HarperCollins;Dey Street Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017;2018
  • City:
    New York
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Straight out of his beloved Twitter feed @RockCriticLaw, acclaimed rock journalist and author of the classic books Come As You Are: The Story of Nirvana and Our Band Could Be Your Life, Michael Azerrad turns his trenchant eye to the art of rock writing itself, hilariously skewering 101 of the genres seemingly endless litany of hackneyed phrases and tropes.

One of the finest music writers today, Michael Azerrad has catalogued the shortcuts, lazy metaphors and uninspired prose that so many of his beloved colleagues all too regularly rely on to fill column inches. In 2014, he began his wickedly droll Twitter feed @RockCriticLaw to expose and make fun of this word-hash. Now, he consolidates these Laws into one witty, comprehensive and fully illustrated volume.

Rock Critic Law includes timeless gems such as:

  • If a band pioneered something, you must say they are seminal. That is the Seminal Law of Rock Criticism.
  • If a recording features densely layered...
  • Azerrad: author's other books


    Who wrote Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

    Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

    Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

    Light

    Font size:

    Reset

    Interval:

    Bookmark:

    Make
    Clichs can be quite fun Thats how they got to be clichs Alan Bennett The - photo 1

    Clichs can be quite fun.

    Thats how they got to be clichs.

    Alan Bennett, The History Boys

    Contents

    Years ago I was on a journalism panel at a major music convention and an - photo 2

    Years ago, I was on a journalism panel at a major music convention, and an earnest fellow in the audience asked, How do you keep it fresh? In a fit of snark, I shot back, Wrap it in plastic! People laughed, but Ive regretted that comment ever sincethe poor guy was asking a good question. Thankfully, my colleague Gina Arnold chimed in with some of the best advice for music critics Ive ever heard: Read fiction. Id guess that most of what Rock Critics read is other Rock Critics. And if Rock Criticism is all you read, then, in a sense, Rock Criticism is likely all youre going to write. Such an incestuous, cannibalistic literary diet probably goes a long way toward explaining the ubiquitous, seemingly indestructible clichs that I call Rock Critic Laws. Now, with blogs and podcasts and social media and all the other available internet platforms, everybody can be a Rock Critic.

    Lately, its also a symptom of economics. With per-word rates plummeting, Rock Critics need to crank out more pieces than ever if they want to make something resembling a living, and its more difficult to conjure le mot juste when its 2 A.M. and youre banging out your third record review that day. Budget-slashing also means that your editor is probably too overworked to nip that sophomore effort or stinging blues licks before it hits the stands.

    The thing is, Rock Critics mainly get over with insight or eloquence or wit or a big personality or just the contagious passion of the fan (or the caustic allure of the hater). We have to, because many of us dont know a lot of things that could come in very handy when writing about music. A lot of us have never performed music to large crowds, or written a song, or played take after take while the engineer and the rest of the band peer at us through double-pane glass. But maybe thats OKas the great New Yorker journalist A.J. Liebling once wrote, To understand a cockfight, you dont have to know how to crow like a rooster. Still, many of us havent studied journalism or writing; many of us dont know the difference between a chord change and a key change, or between Little Anthony and Little Richard. Thats a big reason why everyone loves to poke fun at Rock Criticseven, and especially, other Rock Critics. (Musicians also like to pile on: Frank Zappa infamously called rock journalists people who cant write interviewing people who cant talk for people who cant read.)

    So sometimes Rock Critics feel a little insecure. And, like most insecure people, they try to compensate. One way is to jump on the bandwagon and echo what peers or more established critics are saying. Another is to faithfully lionize the accepted canon of artists. This way, they can feel as if they belong to a club that theyre not 100 percent sure they deserve to be in. But the best way to gain entrance is to know the password. Jargon is a shibboleth, proof of membership. Using it can make a writer feel authoritativeand it can also fool some readers into thinking the writer is authoritative. That impulse is hardly unique to Rock Criticismits in writing about sports, food, wine, philosophy, visual art, technology, politics, and any other subject in which wielding expertise is a blood sport. But only Rock Criticism abuses the word seminal.

    Many Rock Critic Laws date back decades, having endured through metal, glam, prog, folk-rock, singer-songwriter music, new wave, alt-rock, Britpop, emo, neo-post-punk, and all the rest, and passed down through several generations of Rock Critics. From Paul Williamss, uh, seminal Crawdaddy! and on through publications such as NME, Melody Maker, Circus, Creem, Rolling Stone, the Village Voice, Musician, Spin, Blender, Mojo, Paste, and Pitchfork, a shorthand developed. Writers parroted a litany of rote phrases until it became a universally accepted lexicon, rarely remarked upon, much less censured. Until now.

    * * *

    A while back, I was reading some Rock Criticism and became peeved by a piece of boilerplate Id seen countless times before, which can be summarized thusly: When musician A plays on musician Bs album, and then musician B plays on musician As album, musician B is returning the favor. Naturally, I had to share this devastating pearl of editorial insight with the world, in much the same way as when you find something incredibly stinky and say to your friend, Hey, smell this!

    So I tweeted it with the hashtag #RockCriticLaw. And then a few more of these hackneyed tropes occurred to me, constructions that anyone whos read a thousand rock music articles has read, oh, about a thousand times. And I tweeted those out too, with the hashtag #RockCriticLaw. More and more kept coming to me, and so there were tweets about dueling lead guitars and sprawling double albums and, perhaps most dreadful of all, the word moniker. Colleagues, musicians and music fans not only started liking and retweeting these things, they started sending me Rock Critic Laws of their own, and so did various musicians. (Some of which are included in this book, with my deep gratitude.) Among my esteemed peers, it became a guilty pleasure to look down the list of Rock Critic Laws and see which ones they had committed. (As stated, Rock Critics are pretty insecure.)

    After Id tweeted out a few dozen Rock Critic Laws, people started saying, You should do a book!

    Ridiculous! I thought, indignantly. I refuse to be one of those people who does a book of their tweets. Then again, it was kind of a funny idea...

    A reporter from the New York Observer emailed mehe wanted to write a piece about my popular Rock Critic Law tweets. I answered all his questionsthen, at the end, I impetuously added, Oh, and by the way, theres a book in the works. I was bluffing, but what the hell, I said it. And the writer seemed skeptical about it, but nonetheless he played along, bless him. And so the headline of the article read: MICHAEL AZERRAD IS TURNING HIS #ROCKCRITICLAWS INTO A BOOK . Me and my big mouth.

    I sent the article to my agent, who told me, Ha, ha. Now you have to do it!

    And here we are.

    I figured I had to do 101 Laws. One hundred is a really big number, but 101 is one more than thatthat extra push over the cliff, in the words of legendary English rocker Nigel Tufnel, whose amplifiers go to 11. At the time, I actually had fewer than fifty Rock Critic Laws, but it wasnt difficult to get to 101. In fact, I have some to spare.

    Next step: illustrations. One of the first people I met when I went to Seattle in February 1992, on assignment for Rolling Stone, was Edwin Fotheringham. Ed was a key scenester and even sangIm sure hed approve of the quotation marksin a band all too fittingly called the Thrown-Ups. (Pick hit: Eat My Dump.) He was hosting a party at his house and all the guys from Mudhoney were there. In the ensuing years, Ed went from creating album covers for OG Seattle bands such as Mudhoney, the Fall-Outs, Love Battery, and Flop to becoming a widely acclaimed illustrator, a high-class type whose work has appeared in swanky joints like the New Yorker and Vanity Fair and on covers for Verve Records. So I asked him if hed be up for creating 101 illustrations for Rock Critic Law, and not only did he accept the challenge, he devised really ingenious solutions for Laws I thought would be impossible to express visually. Ed is a smart guy and he draws real good.

    Next page
    Light

    Font size:

    Reset

    Interval:

    Bookmark:

    Make

    Similar books «Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music»

    Look at similar books to Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


    Reviews about «Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music»

    Discussion, reviews of the book Rock critic law: 101 unbreakable rules for writing badly about music and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.