Lawrence Warner - The Myth of Piers Plowman
Here you can read online Lawrence Warner - The Myth of Piers Plowman full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: Cambridge University Press, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:The Myth of Piers Plowman
- Author:
- Publisher:Cambridge University Press
- Genre:
- Year:2014
- Rating:3 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
- 60
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
The Myth of Piers Plowman: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Myth of Piers Plowman" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
The Myth of Piers Plowman — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Myth of Piers Plowman" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Addressing the history of the production and reception of the great medieval poem, Piers Plowman , Lawrence Warner reveals the many ways in which scholars, editors, and critics over the centuries created their own speculative narratives about the poem, which gradually came to be regarded as factually true. Warner begins by considering the possibility that Langland wrote a romance about a werewolf and bear-suited lovers, and goes on to explore the methods of the poems localization, and medieval readers particular interest in its Latinity. Warner shows that the Protestant Piers was a reaction against the poems oral mode of transmission, reveals the extensive eighteenth-century textual scholarship on the poem by figures including the maligned Chaucer editor John Urry, and contextualizes its first modernization by a literary forger inspired by the 1790s Shakespeare controversies. This lively account of Piers Plowman challenges the way the poem has traditionally been read and understood.
LAWRENCE WARNER is Senior Lecturer in Medieval English at Kings College London and Director of the International Piers Plowman Society. His book, The Lost History of Piers Plowman : The Earliest Transmission of Langlands Work (2011), received Honorable Mention for the 2013 Richard J. Finneran Award of the Society for Textual Scholarship.
This series of critical books seeks to cover the whole area of literature written in the major medieval languages the main European vernaculars, and medieval Latin and Greek during the period c .11001500. Its chief aim is to publish and stimulate fresh scholarship and criticism on medieval literature, special emphasis being placed on understanding major works of poetry, prose, and drama in relation to the contemporary culture and learning which fostered them.
For a list of titles published in the series, please see .
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «The Myth of Piers Plowman»
Look at similar books to The Myth of Piers Plowman. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book The Myth of Piers Plowman and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.