• Complain

Barbara J. Fields - Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life

Here you can read online Barbara J. Fields - Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Verso, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Verso
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Most people assume that racism grows from a perception of human difference: the fact of race gives rise to the practice of racism. Sociologist Karen E. Fields and historian Barbara J. Fields argue otherwise: the practice of racism produces the illusion of race, through what they call racecraft. And this phenomenon is intimately entwined with other forms of inequality in American life. So pervasive are the devices of racecraft in American history, economic doctrine, politics, and everyday thinking that the presence of racecraft itself goes unnoticed.
That the promised post-racial age has not dawned, the authors argue, reflects the failure of Americans to develop a legitimate language for thinking about and discussing inequality. That failure should worry everyone who cares about democratic institutions.

Barbara J. Fields: author's other books


Who wrote Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

RACECRAFT

The Soul of Inequality in American Life

KAREN E. FIELDS AND
BARBARA J. FIELDS

Racecraft The Soul of Inequality in American Life - image 1

Some readers may be puzzled to see the expression Afro-American used frequently in these pages, African-American being more common these days. We do not take a dogmatic view on such terminological questions, preferring the approach of our grandmother, who used all but two of the terms that prevailed in her day (she died in 1987, just short of ninety-nine): Colored, Negro, Afro-American, and black. She used the term nigger and its close South Carolina cognate nigra only when quoting others with disapproval. Although we leave our fellow citizens to their own choice, we prefer Afro-American . We prefer it because it is time-honored, having deep roots in the literary life of American English. Moreover, it leaves room for useful distinctions. Karens husband Moussa Bagate, a naturalized American citizen born in Ivory Coast, is an African-American. Barack Obama, the child of a Kenyan father and a Euro-American mother, is an African-American. Karen and I, like Michelle Obama, are Afro-Americans. Karens daughter Mamouna, the child of an African-American like the Obamas daughters, and an Afro-American, may choose whichever term she likes.

The Introduction, Chapters 1, 2, and the Conclusion are published here for the first time. Chapters 3 through 8 are republished with minor changes. Details of original publication are given in notes at the beginning of each chapter.

Contents

In the beginning was the deed.

Ludwig Wittgenstein quoting Goethe misquoting John the Apostle

The Idols of the Tribe have their foundation in human nature itself, and in the tribe or race of men.

Francis Bacon

Race is the witchcraft of our time.

M. F. Ashley Montagu

During the 2008 presidential election campaign, hardly a week passed without a reference to Americas post-racial society, which the election of Barack Obama supposedly would establish. If anyone really was imagining such a thing as a post-racial America, what that might be was hard to pin down. Right through the campaign, references to race and the race card kept jostling the post in post-racial. When insinuations about Obamas supposed foreignness cropped up, one journalist called that the new race card. How and why a handful of racist notions have gained permanent sustenance in American life is the subject of this book.

Other supposedly new notions are just as old and as deeply embedded. Todays talk of biracial or multiracial people rehabilitates mulatto , quadroon , octoroon , and the likeyesterdays terms for mixed ancestry. Whatever she thought she was saying about mixed ancestry and mental health, the very phrase accurate racial identity ought to set off sirens. Dangerous lies do not always dress the part.

Where but in recycled racist fiction are monoracial parents to be found to serve as guarantors of accurate racial identity? The least one can say is that the fiction misrepresents the American experience. According to an estimate derived from decades of census reports, some 24 percent of Americans listed in 1970 as white probably had African ancestors, while more than 80 percent of those listed as black had non-African ones, which implies that there were nearly twice as many white as black Americans of African descent. In sum, restoring notions of race mixture to center stage recommits us, willy-nilly, to the discredited idea of racial purity, the basic premise of bio-racism.

The latter, meanwhile, is neither gone nor forgotten. Bio-racism is a more precise appellation for the nineteenth-century research just sketched than the more usual term, race science. For all the measuring and experimenting that research inspired, it failed as science. Therefore, if the scientific logic is indeed non-racial, the folk classification ought to wither under its influence. To adhere to both old and new is to pick up and put down modern science with shameless promiscuity.

However, such picking up and putting down has its defenders, sometimes offering defenses so remarkable as to justify this books new coinage, racecraft. That term highlights the ability of pre- or non-scientific modes of thought to hijack the minds of the scientifically literate. Here, an anthropologist defends the traditional folk classification: After all, genetics has added very little to what scientists, or indeed any observant people, have known for centuries about human groups Modern genetics can be a bit more technically specific, but the basic truths are not new . The check-box method reduces genetics to a matter of querying, or simply glancing at, the research subject. If looks-like genetics and says-so genomics are respectable tools, what, indeed, could modern science add to popular belief?

Fortunately, not all American scientists choose to yoke their technological racehorse to the centuries-old oxcart. J. Craig Venter, whose imagination accelerated to warp speed the race to map the human genome, reflected on his work autobiographically in A Life Decoded .

Venters way of introducing new science to a lay public seems more in accord with the ingrained individualism that so impressed early visitors to America, like Alexis de Tocqueville in the 1830s, than with the ingrained anti-individualism that the very word gene evokes for many today.

Venter was surely mistaken, however, when he suggested that greater scientific literacy might help combat (altogether predictable) discrimination in the use of genomics.

But a statement does not acquire validity because a duly ordained scientist utters it. The sirens went off immediately. Certain of Watsons fellow molecular biologists took the floor with a scientifically correct formulation: It was not possible to draw such conclusions from the work that has been done on DNA. Dr. Venter, who happened to be traveling in the United Kingdom at the same time, said, There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.

Not all who piled onto Dr. Watson can claim to differ fundamentally from him. Shortly after he published his own genome online, scientists at Icelands deCode Genetics startled the world with a revelation. Watson had 16 times more genes of black origin than the average white European16 percent rather than the 1 percent that most of his origin would have. This level is what you would expect in someone who had a great-grandparent who was African.

As if all that were not enough, now comes a techno-fad that purports to determine the so-called tribal origins of Afro-Americans with the help of Personal Genetic Histories (PGHs). What an irony, then, if the World War II defeat of the Nazis did indeed discredit race science, only to have the yearning for identity and the jaw swabs of Afro-American bio-genealogists abet its revival. Whatever the post may mean in post-racial, it cannot mean that racism belongs to the past. Post-racial turns out to besimplyracial; which is to say, racist.

Something is afoot that is the business of every citizen who thought that the racist concepts of a century ago were goneand good riddance!as a result of the Civil Rights Movement. The continued vitality of those concepts stands as a reminder that, however important a historical watershed the election of an African-American president may be, Americas post-racial era has not been born. Perhaps it can be made if America lets those concepts go. But if they are hard to let go, why is that? What are they made of? How do they work? And what work do they do? Those are our subjects in the coming chapters. For now, we sketch our answers briefly and bluntly, so as not to preempt the essays to come. One general point must be made at the outset, however, and with an important caveat: Racist concepts do considerable work in political and economic life; but , if they were merely an appendage of politics and economics, without intimate roots in other phases of life, their persuasiveness would accordingly diminish.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life»

Look at similar books to Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life»

Discussion, reviews of the book Racecraft: The Soul of Inequality in American Life and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.