• Complain

Ben Lerner - The Hatred of Poetry

Here you can read online Ben Lerner - The Hatred of Poetry full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2016, publisher: McClelland & Stewart, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Hatred of Poetry
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    McClelland & Stewart
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2016
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Hatred of Poetry: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Hatred of Poetry" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Novelist and poet Ben Lerner argues that our hatred of poetry is ultimately a sign of its continued relevance.
Poetry. Perhaps Marianne Moore said it best: I, too, dislike it. What other art takes its marginality as a given, and is so widely bemoaned even by its practitioners? Ben Lerner writes, Many more people agree they hate poetry than can agree what poetry is. I, too, dislike it and have largely organized my life around it and do not experience that as a contradiction because poetry and the hatred of poetry are inextricable in ways it is my purpose to explore.
In this inventive and plain-spoken essay, Lerner takes the hatred of poetry as the starting point of his defence of the art. He examines both poetrys greatest haters (beginning with Plato, who famously claimed that an ideal city had no place for poets, who would only corrupt and mislead the young) and its greatest practitioners, providing inspired close-readings of Keats, Dickinson, Whitman, and...No art has been denounced as often as poetry. Its even bemoaned by poets: I, too, dislike it, wrote Marianne Moore. Many more people agree they hate poetry, Ben Lerner writes, than can agree what poetry is. I, too, dislike it and have largely organized my life around it and do not experience that as a contradiction because poetry and the hatred of poetry are inextricable in ways it is my purpose to explore.In this inventive and lucid essay, Lerner takes the hatred of poetry as the starting point of his defense of the art. He examines poetrys greatest haters (beginning with Platos famous claim that an ideal city had no place for poets, who would only corrupt and mislead the young) and both its greatest and worst practitioners, providing inspired close readings of Keats, Dickinson, McGonagall, Whitman, and others. Throughout, he attempts to explain the noble failure at the heart of every truly great and truly horrible poem: the impulse to launch the experience of an individual into a timeless communal existence. In The Hatred of Poetry, Lerner has crafted an entertaining, personal, and entirely original examination of a vocation no less essential for being impossible.

Ben Lerner: author's other books


Who wrote The Hatred of Poetry? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Hatred of Poetry — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Hatred of Poetry" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
PRAISE FOR 1004 Lerner writes with a poets attention to language and manages - photo 1

PRAISE FOR 10:04

Lerner writes with a poets attention to language, and manages to make his preoccupation with identity more than solipsistic.10:04 connects this anxiety about identity with metaphysical questions concerning time and repetition.

Hari Kunzru, The New York Times

A generous, provocative, ambitious Chinese box of a novel, 10:04 is a near-perfect piece of literature.

The Los Angeles Review of Books

Ben Lerner is a brilliant novelist, and one unafraid to make of the novel something truly new. 10:04 is a work of endless wit, pleasure, relevance, and vitality.

Rachel Kushner, author of The Flamethrowers

If, as J.M. Coetzee insists, great writers deform their medium in order to say what has never been said before, Ben Lerner is a great writer and 10:04 a great novel.

The Guardian

10:04 will illuminate you to yourself for a long time to come.

National Post

Ben Lerner was born in Topeka, Kansas, in 1979. He has received fellowships from the Fulbright, Guggenheim, and MacArthur Foundations, and is the author of two internationally acclaimed novels, Leaving the Atocha Station and 10:04. He has published three poetry collections: The Lichtenberg Figures, Angle of Yaw, and Mean Free Path. Lerner is a professor of English at Brooklyn College.

ALSO BY BEN LERNER

FICTION

10:04

Leaving the Atocha Station

POETRY

Mean Free Path

Angle of Yaw

The Lichtenberg Figures

Copyright 2016 by Ben Lerner Hardcover edition published 2016 McClelland - photo 2Copyright 2016 by Ben Lerner Hardcover edition published 2016 McClelland - photo 3

Copyright 2016 by Ben Lerner

Hardcover edition published 2016

McClelland & Stewart and colophon are registered trademarks of McClelland & Stewart, a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited, a Penguin Random House Company

All rights reserved. The use of any part of this publication reproduced, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system, without the prior written consent of the publisher or, in case of photocopying or other reprographic copying, a licence from the Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency is an infringement of the copyright law.

Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication is available upon request

ISBN9780771048258

eBook ISBN9780771048265

Published simultaneously in the United States of America by Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, New York.

McClelland & Stewart,

a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited,

a Penguin Random House Company

www.penguinrandomhouse.ca

v41 a Contents I n ninth grade English Mrs X required us to memorize and - photo 4v41 a Contents I n ninth grade English Mrs X required us to memorize and - photo 5

v4.1

a

Contents

I n ninth grade English, Mrs. X required us to memorize and recite a poem, so I went and asked the Topeka High librarian to direct me to the shortest poem she knew, and she suggested Marianne Moores Poetry, which, in the 1967 version, reads in its entirety:

I, too, dislike it.

Reading it, however, with a perfect contempt for it, one discovers in

it, after all, a place for the genuine.

I remember thinking my classmates were suckers for having mainly memorized Shakespeares eighteenth sonnet, whereas I had only to recite twenty-four words. Never mind the fact that a set rhyme scheme and iambic pentameter make fourteen of Shakespeares lines easier to memorize than Moores three, each one of which is interrupted by a conjunctive adverba parallelism of awkwardness that basically serves as its form. That, plus the four instances of it, makes Moore sound like a priest begrudgingly admitting that sex has its function while trying to avoid using the word, an effect amplified by the deliberately clumsy enjambment of the second line and the third (in / it). In fact, Poetry is a very difficult poem to commit to memory, as I demonstrated by failing to get it right each of the three chances I was given by Mrs. X, who was looking down at the text, my classmates cracking up.

I, too

Unceasing
prayer

My contempt for the assignment was, after all, imperfect. Even now I routinely misquote the second sentence; I just Googled the poem and had to correct what I typed out above, but who could forget the first? I, too, dislike it has been on repeat in my head since 1993; when I open a laptop to write or a book to read: I, too, dislike it echoes in my inner ear. When a poet is being introduced (including myself) at a reading, whatever else I hear, I hear: I, too, dislike it. When I teach, I basically hum it. When somebody tells me, as so many people have told me, that they dont get poetry in general or my poetry in particular and/or believe that poetry is dead: I, too, dislike it. Sometimes this refrain has the feel of negative rumination and sometimes a kind of manic, mantric affirmation, as close as I get to unceasing prayer.

The defenses
light up

Poetry: What kind of art assumes the dislike of its audience and what kind of artist aligns herself with that dislike, even encourages it? An art hated from without and within. What kind of art has as a condition of its possibility a perfect contempt? And then, even reading contemptuously, you dont achieve the genuine. You can only clear a place for ityou still dont encounter the actual poem, the genuine article. Every few years an essay appears in a mainstream periodical denouncing poetry or proclaiming its death, usually blaming existing poets for the relative marginalization of the art, and then the defenses light up the blogosphere before the culture, if we can call it a culture, turns its attention, if we can call it attention, back to the future. But why dont we ask: What kind of art is definedhas been defined for millenniaby such a rhythm of denunciation and defense? Many more people agree they hate poetry than can agree what poetry is. I, too, dislike it, and have largely organized my life around it (albeit with far less discipline and skill than Marianne Moore) and do not experience that as a contradiction because poetry and the hatred of poetry are for meand maybe for youinextricable.

What should
I sing?

Caedmon, the first poet in English whose name we know, learned the art of song in a dream. According to Bedes Historia, Caedmon was an illiterate cowherd who couldnt sing. When, during this or that merry feast, it was decided that everyone in turn would contribute a song, Caedmon would withdraw in embarrassment, maybe claiming he had to go look after the animals. One night, somebody tries to pass Caedmon the harp after dinner, and he flees to the stable. There among the ungulates he drifts off and is visited by a mysterious figure, probably God. You must sing to me, says God. I cant, Caedmon says, if not in these words. Thats why Im sleeping in the stable instead of drinking mead with my friends around the fire. But God (or an angel or demonthe text is vague) keeps demanding a song. But what should I sing? asks Caedmon, who I imagine is desperate, cold-sweating through a nightmare. Sing the beginning of created things, instructs the visitor. Caedmon opens his mouth and, to his amazement, gorgeous verses praising God pour forth.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Hatred of Poetry»

Look at similar books to The Hatred of Poetry. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Hatred of Poetry»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Hatred of Poetry and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.