Spaces and Times
Relativity Superluminal
Dr. Tams Lajtner
www.lajtner.com
Copyright 2020 Dr. Tams Lajtner
All rights reserved
Cover design by: Dr. Tams Lajtner
Contents
I. THE FORCE OF THOUGHT
VS. 19 AXIOMS OF PHYSICS
I. THE FORCE OF THOUGHT
VS. 19 AXIOMS OF PHYSICS
1. STAGFLATION OF PHYSICS?
Stagflation is a term of economy. It means that economic growth stagnates while inflation increases. Stagflation is a phenomenon that must be stopped as soon as possible.
What does stagflation of physics mean? This is my elegant expression for this: Many new theories with no results.
How to stop the stagflation of physics?
1.1. As simple as possible
This book is about our physics from a new viewpoint. Physics has some old physics axioms. I would like to realize there are problems with them. The statements and conclusions written here are not independent of each other. Therefore my proposed new axioms have a framework called Space-Matter Theory, which differs from any other theory. This is a framework built of new axioms. This theory does away with some old theoretical paradigms and explains hundred year old riddles of physics.
Studying axioms is almost philosophy. Therefore I have hardly used mathematics. Your high school knowledge is enough to understand the whole book, and you may even skip all functions. An explanation goes with each one.
There is an important assumption in the following. Every law of physics works the same way in the whole Universe.
Will scientists like this book? Knowing their pipe vision, it could only be a wish. The mainstream is a hard nut where, in many cases, the false one is better than the new and right one. The freethinker disaster gets punished: excommunication, exile. Physics and every other science and even art is full of such examples.
So my book is a dangerous adventure. And certainly an exiting one. I hope you will enjoy it.
1.2. Physics dilemma?
Physics is a broad science with widely varied areas, such as classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, optics, biophysics, astrometry, cosmology etc. The regions of physics are developing fast, but not the physics theories. There are two big and working theories of todays physics: the General Theory of Relativity and the Standard Model of Physics. General relativity is more than 100, the standard model is about 40 years old. Of course the last decades added new results to these models, but their fundamentals and scopes have been untouched.
General relativity defines gravity as the curvature of spacetime. The standard model of physics describes the elementary particles of matter and their three fundamental interactions, but it does not speak about gravity. The idea is simple, the two theories must be merged. Until now this merged theory is missing. Why?
The problem in headlines is as follows: In the standard model of quantum physics a particle can be at two different places at the same time. Where is its gravity? General relativity cannot answer the question, because it has no quantum properties. Physicists have not found the link between the two theories. Therefore many scientists speak about the dilemma of physics.
FIG. 11 No connection between general relativity and the standard model of physics.
(Credit CC0 T. Lajtner, Lajtner.com)
At the end of the book this picture will be modified, since there is an obvious connection between the two theories. To understand this connection we have to rethink more axioms of physics. Here is the first one:
1.3. Action without reaction
We know from quantum mechanics that particles of matter are in constant vibration. In our academic physics this vibration has no impact on space. This action remains without reaction. This is an axiom of modern physics and it must be false. (No.1)
It is a physical impossibility for matter to come into contact with space without vibrations having an effect. Based on the Casimir Effect, on the measurements of LIGO, and on other physical phenomena we can state that space exists in waves and vibrations. Space waves. This statement is a consequence of our new viewpoint which is not blocked by a false axiom.
2. Axioms are opinions
Every science is on axioms. What is an axiom? A statement, an opinion that is readily accepted as true and correct. But what happens if an axiom is somehow problematic. It has to be replaced.
In modern history Hungarian Jnos Blyai (1802 - 1860) (and the Russian Nikolai Lobachevsky (1792-1856) knew best how to replace an axiom. They were the firts to replace an axiom that was thought to be eternal.
That axiom was: All points of parallel lines are equidistant from each other, according to the definition of John Playfair (1748 - 1819). The green line is the only such parallel line that goes through the black point as it showed in FIG. 21(A). It was believed until Jnos Blyai challenged the axiom. The essence of the challenge was: parallel straight lines do not intersect. It does not seem to be a big change, but it took many thousand years for someone to think of it. It is a big change! And how big! A brand new geometry, the hyperbolic geometry and many more had been created based on this. In the Euclidean geometry only one single parallel line can be drawn to the black line, if we want the new line to go through the black dot, however there are many parallel lines in the Blyai geometry, see FIG. 21B.
FIG. 21 Old axiom, new axiom.
A) Old axiom: The black line and the green line are parallel. The red lines are not.
B) New axiom: Green lines and the black line are parallel. (Cf. Joseph L. F. Bertrand (1822 1900) and Henri Poincar (18541912)).
The new definition can also be used for the old parallelism requirement if the lines are in the Euclidean space. But Blyai opened a whole new world that did not exist until his breakthrough recognition. The recognition was shockingly new in Blyais time, today it is common knowledge.
As one can see, the axiom to be replaced is not necessarily useless, but it does not allow to develop science in new directions. It is not wrong, just out-of-date. On the other hand it is false, because it stops science developing. In other words, if you always work with the same axioms, there will be areas that remain unobserved. The entrance of new areas are locked up in axioms.
FIG. 22 False axioms block the development.
(Credit CC0 John Curtis, CurtisDigital.com, Edited, https://codepen.io/social_quotient/)
See FIG.22 The playground of theoretical physicists bordered by black lines is between Axiom and Axiom . We know the lime, yellow and orange areas. Without changing these axioms nobody will find the red, pink, blue and green areas. They simply do not exist for scientists because of the given axioms. No theory is able to describe these areas without changing Axiom and Axiom . Therefore the dilemma of physics is not a crisis of physics but a signal that some axioms of physics are false.
I have found 19 false axioms in physics we have to change.
2.1. 19 false axioms of physics
- The vibration of particle does not cause reaction in space